Earlier quoted context omitted.
when was it tried?
Well, the ones tried were close enough. Soviets and the all eastern block, Cuba, Cambodia, China, North Korea. They all contained communist ideas such as common ownership, abolishing private property, central planning, and somewhat classless society. Apparently event the theory does not hold much weight as almost all collapsed or converted to some form of nationalist totalitarian regime. Perhaps once robots do all ou…
Facebook paid £4,327 corporation tax in the UK in 2014
441–449 of 449 posts
Re: Facebook paid £4,327 corporation tax in the UK in 2014
#442Re: Facebook paid £4,327 corporation tax in the UK in 2014
#443Earlier quoted context omitted.
Well, the ones tried were close enough. Soviets and the all eastern block, Cuba, Cambodia, China, North Korea. They all contained communist ideas such as common ownership, abolishing private property, central planning, and somewhat classless society. Apparently event the theory does not hold much weight as almost all collapsed or converted to some form of nationalist totalitarian regime. Perhaps once robots do all ou…
All of those that you mentioned were totalitarian regimes, hence no true communism (as described by Marx) has been tried.
Re: Facebook paid £4,327 corporation tax in the UK in 2014
#444Earlier quoted context omitted.
I utterly reject this argument > 362 Facebook staff on an average salary of say £65,000 will contribute at least £7,230,696.60 in taxes and NI to HMRC. Let's also not pretend that £65,000 is the average salary at Facebook UK, it's likely much higher. First of all, that's Facebook employees paying tax. Not Facebook. That's their money that they are taxed on and they pay it. Secondly, no one is asking for Facebook to p…
> That's their money that they are taxed on and they pay it. The only reason Facebook doesn't have to pay taxes on that money is because they gave it to their employees (so it counts against profit). The money comes from FB profits, briefly goes to the employees, then to the government. Hence, the government is getting a cut of the money FB is making. What's the problem?
Facebook luxembourg provides a license for Facebook UK to use the facebook logo. The fee for that license just happens to coincide with all the profits Facebook UK made this year.
It's a fictional cost, and totally legal. But its still dirt bag behaviour.
Re: Facebook paid £4,327 corporation tax in the UK in 2014
#445Earlier quoted context omitted.
No, they use every trick in the book not to, ending up paying less than your local frozen yogurt place (exaggerating a little, but still).
So the problem is existence of the book of tricks. Apple did not write it.
Re: Facebook paid £4,327 corporation tax in the UK in 2014
#446Re: Facebook paid £4,327 corporation tax in the UK in 2014
#447In terms of providing social value, Facebook employees far surpass any government's employees. In just a few years Facebook has revolutionized how people connect with each other, whereas governments have, in general, barely been able to maintain the accomplishments of previous generations. This despite the fact that government generally force people to pay about one fifth of their labor, whereas Facebook offers its s…
You're taking a highly subjective view and presenting it as fact. That Facebook is a "socially beneficial organization" is extremely debatable. I would argue that Facebook has actually had a detrimental effect on social cohesion.
In contrast, governments are violent organizations specialize in coercion. Governments extract their revenue by force or threat of force and use their revenue to fund institutions and projects that people would not pay for voluntarily. Governments maintain power by direct force (police and military), by deceit and misinformation (control of the money supply, compulsory education), by monopolizing necessary institutions and services (dispute resolution, security), and by appealing to people's greed and envy. It is nearly impossible to opt out of government services, especially in the sense of not paying for them (taxes).
Re: Facebook paid £4,327 corporation tax in the UK in 2014
#448Earlier quoted context omitted.
Do you think they'd pay more or less tax in Dublin compared to £5k? Irelands 12.5% seems very reasonable considering its so close to its effective rate. France, Britain and Germany all allow massive write offs and loop holes that mean their effective rate is multiples lower than their stated corporate tax rate and this story will be forgotten by the Brits, Germans and French who'll turn around and repeat their condem…
> Irelands 12.5% seems very reasonable considering its so close to its effective rate. Very little of the actual profits of Facebook are actually subject to the 12.5% corporate tax of Ireland. In a European corporate tax evasion scheme such as Facebook's, there's typically four to five legal entities in two or three countries. The branch making the actual profits (e.g. Facebook UK) pays their profits as "license fees…
Re: Facebook paid £4,327 corporation tax in the UK in 2014
#449Earlier quoted context omitted.
Wealth tax is obviously (I think!) the best kind of tax but the problem with it is it's hard to collect (you would need to assess wealth of everyone and that is a problem).
Please consider what kind of behaviour you would encourage. If wealth erodes every year then this strongly disincentives long term thinking and rewards business ventures which give quick cash and then burn out, like strip mining, and punishes planning for the future like pensions. You want your tax system to reward long term thinking, not punish it.