Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

artificialanalysis.ai

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

431–440 of 472 posts

Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

#431

Post by Rover222 »

mpawelski wrote: post #406
Rover222 wrote: post #370

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You can find pictures of AOC and Mamdani doing the exact same gesture. It’s obviously a common gesture when emoting to crowds. But you just want to believe the narrative. If you’re worried about Nazis, take a look at all the pro-Hamas people.

It never cease to amaze me that the usual response (and Musk's defense itself) is that you can find a picture with some other figure with the same gesture. Who cares about the pictures? There is a whole video where you can see that he does historically accurate nazi salute then turn back and do it again. Stop talking about pictures, always show video of what happened. Find me a video of someone else doing the same an…

Once again, it is incredibly ignorant to suggest that just because it looks like a Nazi salute that was the intention. There’s no reality that suggests that was his intention. It’s just your political brainwashing.

Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

#432

Post by pirates »

Rover222 wrote: post #387
theyliesoeasily wrote: post #376

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've seen the claimed pictures in context with their videos, they are distinctly different gestures in timing and emphasis - normal waves, without the sharp hand to chest -> locked elbow with hand outstretched motion. Again, the seig heil is a particular gesture with a particular emphasis and timing which Musk imitated precisely, twice in quick succession. Those other photos are decontextualized from gestures which w…

It is seriously absurd to believe he did it as a Nazi salute. But you just want to believe it.

It is seriously absurd to not believe he did it as a Nazi salute. But you just want to not believe.

Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

#433

Post by pirates »

qwerpy wrote: post #143
sumeno wrote: post #121

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There are already features that let you skip conversations you don't like. Just click the - next to the post and stop whining about it

Nah, I think I'll keep calling it out when people keep going on political tangents. Maybe my whining will help everyone save some time.

It won’t, but you do you.

Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

#434

Post by freejazz »

losvedir wrote: post #123
freejazz wrote: post #64

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

I think "system prompt" is the key bit they're getting at. It doesn't necessarily reflect poorly on the underlying model if the system prompt was bad. It does reflect somewhat, in terms of alignment (how well the model does what the training company wants) and instruction following (how well the model does what the user wants). But it's not so clear to me what exactly the right answer is here. E.g., a model that scru…

The point isn't that it's the underlying model, it's that it happened at all in the first place...

Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

#435

Post by theyliesoeasily »

Rover222 wrote: post #431
mpawelski wrote: post #406

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It never cease to amaze me that the usual response (and Musk's defense itself) is that you can find a picture with some other figure with the same gesture. Who cares about the pictures? There is a whole video where you can see that he does historically accurate nazi salute then turn back and do it again. Stop talking about pictures, always show video of what happened. Find me a video of someone else doing the same an…

Once again, it is incredibly ignorant to suggest that just because it looks like a Nazi salute that was the intention. There’s no reality that suggests that was his intention. It’s just your political brainwashing.

Musk appeared at a far right political rally a short time later, and told them not to be ashamed of their heritage (https://www.gbnews.com/politics/us/elon-musk-afd-germany).

The AfD who he appeared in support of has been found in court to use nazi imagery in political advertising (https://www.world-today-journal.com/afds-moller-fined-e12000...).

So the seig heil didn't happen in isolation, there's a followup of explicit support for nazi-adjacent political ideologies.

Does this count as evidence to support that this was an intentional seig heil to you, even if it doesn't change your mind? What evidence would change your mind?

Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

#436

Post by theyliesoeasily »

Rover222 wrote: post #429
btreecat wrote: post #424

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why would Israeli settlers commit ethnic cleansing despite their country existing as a response to ethnic cleansing? Idk I'm not a Zionist, but it's clearly what's happening.

You’re just incapable of talking about these things honestly. It’s NOT ethnic cleansing. Your exaggeration of that war, and your calling Musk a Nazi is what gets people shot in the neck.

Here's recent first-hand documentation of ethnic cleansing in Palestine from an independent source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xvvGbzR2Xek .

What evidence in that video do you refute? What evidence would change your mind?

Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

#437

Post by UltraSane »

jamesrcole wrote: post #410
UltraSane wrote: post #394

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Lets assume what you say is true about Musk THEN, it isn't true about current day Twitter addicted, drug addicted, brain damaged Musk at all. If he ever had any capability to execute and listen to advice the Cybertruck proves he doesn't anymore. Musk has learned how easy it is to fool people like you and is all in on it.

> Lets assume what you say is true about Musk There's no need to assume. If you are actually educated on the subject, you know it is the case. You don't because you're ignorant about it. Which would be fine, if you weren't pontificating about things you know nothing anything about. > current day Twitter addicted, drug addicted, brain damaged Musk this is like conspiracy-theory level stuff.

No, his completely insane behavior while in charge of DOGE and his many thousands of insipid Twitter posts are very good evidence of it.

Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

#438

Post by TSiege »

unselect5917 wrote: post #188
TSiege wrote: post #133

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

This is the first I'm hearing of this. I can barely get it to generate tame things that aren't porn half the time.

It was headline news for months that it was used to generate non consensual content of women. It also was used to do the same thing for children

https://rainn.org/rainn-statement-on-use-of-xais-grok-to-pro...

Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

#439

Post by [deleted] »

unselect5917 wrote: post #305
bearjaws wrote: post #209

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not sure if you are memeing since this is an Elon quote... > Interestingly, "politically incorrect" is a double negative that simplifies to "true". Only if you like generic Twitter quips, logical fallacies and ignoring context for anything remotely nuanced.

It's neither an Elon quote nor a logical fallacy. I came up with it myself all by myself. Seek help for your MDS.

[deleted]

Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

#440

Post by bearjaws »

unselect5917 wrote: post #305
bearjaws wrote: post #209

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not sure if you are memeing since this is an Elon quote... > Interestingly, "politically incorrect" is a double negative that simplifies to "true". Only if you like generic Twitter quips, logical fallacies and ignoring context for anything remotely nuanced.

It's neither an Elon quote nor a logical fallacy. I came up with it myself all by myself. Seek help for your MDS.

Sorry not a direct quote, but basically a rip off of "politically incorrect, but nonetheless factually true".

Whatever you want to call your super duper clever rewording of a reductionist statement.

Post reply on HN