Live data from Hacker News

Significant US farm losses persist, despite federal assistance

fb.org

431–432 of 432 posts

Re: Significant US farm losses persist, despite federal assistance

#431

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My understanding was that the meat-packing process in the US involves a butchering method that results in more fecal matter contamination, posing the risk of salmonella, which necessitates the wash. Those bacteria occur naturally, so you can't avoid that without being careful with butchering, which is probably what the EU standards require. But I doubt the big meat conglomerates like Tyson will want any hit to produc…

Mechanically separated meat bluntly ruptures the digestive tract and smears the flesh with feces. So they soak the feces and flesh together in a chlorine or acid bath to sanitize it. It's disgusting.

Does EU not use mechanical meat separation for chickens? If not, wouldn't their costs be dramatically higher?

Re: Significant US farm losses persist, despite federal assistance

#432
post #427

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You have to live in or near the city to collect the higher minimum wage. With UBI you could live anywhere. Even outside the country maybe. They aren't comparable.

UBI doesn't fix this because whereever someone live will start the process of someone absorbing income, regardless if it's income or not. You need to break the chain between income of people and land ownership by taxing land ownership.

Land ownership is taxed. With UBI someone could buy land out in the boonies and put down a trailer and just live there.
Post reply on HN