Earlier quoted context omitted.
>That whole way of thinking isn't appropriate. 5% is an insane number of people, when you are that large these things are no longer optional. And hardware compatibility issues are? The fact that orders of magnitude more people don't use Linux at all, disabled or not, because of lacking features or usability is optional? If 5% of people is an insane number of people, surely usability for them all is more important tha…
Hardware compatibility issues are just a distraction in this discussion. You can do both . If all of the hardware compatibility issues would be resolved there would be some other excuse.
Since you're such a noble white knight, why don't you code up those accessibility features you think are the most important missing part ? I'll wait.