Live data from Hacker News

Apple announces Foundation Models and Containerization frameworks, etc

apple.com

431–440 of 514 posts

Re: Apple announces Foundation Models and Containerization frameworks, etc

#431

> New Design with Liquid Glass Looks like software UI design – just like fashion, film, architecture and many other fields I'm sure – has now officially entered the "nothing new under the sun" / "let's recycle ideas from xx years ago" stage. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aqua_%28user_interface%29 To be clear, this is just an observation, not a judgment of that change or the quality of the design by itself. I was gett…

[deleted]

Re: Apple announces Foundation Models and Containerization frameworks, etc

#433
post #296

HN should have a conference-findings thread for something like WWDC, with priority impact rankings P4: Foundation models will get newbies involved, but aren't ready to displace other model providers. P4: New containers are ergonomic when sub-second init is required, but otw no virtualization news. P2: Concurrency now visible in instruments and debuggable, high-performance tracing avoid sampling errors; are we finally…

[deleted]

Re: Apple announces Foundation Models and Containerization frameworks, etc

#434
post #394
post #238

There's a different thread if you want to wax about Fluid Glass etc [1], but there's some really interesting new improvements here for Apple Developers in Xcode 26. The new foundation frameworks around generative language model stuff looks very swift-y and nice for Apple developers. And it's local and on device. In the Platforms State of the Union they showed some really interesting sample apps using it to generate d…

I might we wrong but I guess this will only works on iphone 16 devices and iphone 15 pro - thus drastically limits your user base and you would still have to use online API for most apps. I was hoping they provide free ai api on their private cloud for other devices even if also running small models

If you start writing an app now, by the time it's polished enough to release it, the iPhone 16 will already be a year old phone, and there will be plenty potential customers.

If your app is worthwhile, and gets popular in a few years, by that time iPhone 16 will be an old phone and a reasonable minimum target.

Skate to where the puck is going...

Re: Apple announces Foundation Models and Containerization frameworks, etc

#435

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But the opposite of "flat" is not "transparent". This was posted in another HN thread about Liquid Glass: https://imgur.com/a/6ZTCStC . I'm sure Apple will tweak the opacity before it goes live, but this looks horribly insane to me.

Agreed, people have said perhaps its Apple's way of bringing VR vibes to the UI, showing layers of UI elements. But I'm not so sure if I want transparent.

The explicitly mention this is (paraphrasing) "bringing elements from visionOS to all your devices" in the video in TFA.

Re: Apple announces Foundation Models and Containerization frameworks, etc

#436

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And I couldnt be happier to see it back. I have not been a fan of the flattening of UI design over the last 15 years.

But the opposite of "flat" is not "transparent". This was posted in another HN thread about Liquid Glass: https://imgur.com/a/6ZTCStC . I'm sure Apple will tweak the opacity before it goes live, but this looks horribly insane to me.

bleary eyed, waking up while trying to find my reading glasses would make that interface essentially useless.

Re: Apple announces Foundation Models and Containerization frameworks, etc

#437
post #41

iPad update is going to encourage a new series of folks trying to use iPads for general programming. I'm curious how it goes this time around. I'm cautiously optimistic

Isn't it still impossible to run any dev tools on the iPad?

I can assume that they are going to bring the Container stuff to iPad at some point. That would unlock so many things...

Re: Apple announces Foundation Models and Containerization frameworks, etc

#438
post #414
post #137

I hoped for a moment that "Containerization Framework" meant that macOS itself would be getting containers. Running Linux containers and VMs on macOS via virtualization is already pretty easy and has many good options. If you're willing to use proprietary applications to do this, OrbStack is the slickest, but Lima/Colima is fine, and Podman Desktop and Rancher Desktop work well, too. The thing macOS really painfully…

> The thing macOS really painfully lacks is not ergonomic ways to run Linux VMs, but actual, native containers-- macOS containers Linux container processes run on the host kernel with extra sandboxing. The container image is an easily sharable and runnable bundle. macOS .app bundles are kind of like container images. You can sign them to ensure they are not modified, and put them into the “registry” (App Store). The…

You're kind of right. But at the same time they are nowhere close. The beauty of Linux containerization is that processes can be wholly ignorant that they are not in fact running as root. The containers get, what appear to them, to be the whole OS to themselves.

You don't get that in macOS. It's more of a jail than a sandbox. For example, as an app you can't, as far as I know, shell out and install homebrew and then invoke homebrew and install, say, postgres, and run it, all without affecting the user's environment. I think that's what people mean when they say macOS lacks native containers.

Re: Apple announces Foundation Models and Containerization frameworks, etc

#439
post #417

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Ish - it always depends how deep in the weeds you need to get. Tokenisation impacts performance, both speed and results, so details can be important.

I maintain a llama.cpp wrapper, on everything from web to Android and cannot quite wrap my mind around if you'd have any more info by getting individual token IDs from the API, beyond what you'd get from wall clock time and checking their vocab.

I don’t really see a need for token IDs alone, but you absolutely need per-token logprob vectors if you’re trying to do constrained decoding

Re: Apple announces Foundation Models and Containerization frameworks, etc

#440
post #354

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Using the Linux filesystem has almost no performance penalty under WSL2 since it is a VM. Docker Desktop automatically mounts the correct filesystem. Crossing the OS boundary for Windows files has some overhead of course but that's not the usecase WSL2 is optimized for. With WSL2 you get the best of both worlds. A system with perfect driver and application support and a Linux-native environment. Hybrid GPUs, webcams,…

FWIW I get better battery life with ubuntu.

Are you comparing against the default vendor image that's filled with adware or a clean Windows install with only drivers? There is a significant power use difference and the latter case has always been more power efficient for me compared to the Linux setup. Powering down Nvidia GPU has never fully worked with Linux for me.
Post reply on HN