Earlier quoted context omitted.
No. Anytime someone potentially possesses information that is damning to a company and that person is killed… the low probability of such an even being a random coincidence is quite low. It is so low such that it is extremely reasonable to consider the potential for an actual assassination while not precluding that a coincidence is a possibility.
Computer the probability, don’t make claims without making a solid estimate. No, it’s not low. No need to put conspiracies before evidence, and certainly not by making claims you’ve not done no diligence on. And the article provides statements by professionals who routinely investigate homicides and suicides that they have no reason to believe anything other than suicide.
Why don’t you tell me the probability instead of demanding one from me? You’re the one making a claim that professional judgment makes the probability so solid that it’s basically a suicide. So tell me about your computation.
What gets me is the level of stupid you have to be to not even consider the other side. Like if a person literally tells you he’s not going to suicide and if he does it’s an assassination then he suicides and your first instinct is to only trust what the professionals say well… I can’t help you.