Live data from Hacker News

Omegle 2009-2023

omegle.com

431–440 of 1001 posts

Re: Omegle 2009-2023

#431

This brings back some amazing memories. If I remember correctly, the original inspiration for Omegle came from 4chan; or more precisely, a user thought of stretching the limits of "anonymous free speech" to realtime communications, and came up with the idea in late 2007. The PoC server for it was nothing more than "telnet to this IP" and it was sporadically advertised on 4chan for a short while. Astonishingly, Google…

That Google search you suggested appears (barring some UI thing I'm missing because I'm on Mobile) to only have two results, your comment and the 4chan archive. Is there a name for a google search with exactly two results? I know one with one single result is called a Googlewhack.

A Twooglewhack.

Re: Omegle 2009-2023

#433
post #5

Back to Chatroulette then? Having not used either platform, what’s the difference?

We built a website over a year ago https://ehmeh.com/ In there you can video chat with multiple people, similar to Omegle. The difference may be that the video chat is in ASCII and the connection is done in WebRTC, fun alternative.

Re: Omegle 2009-2023

#434

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Calling it new posters is already weird

For real. I've never heard of that term until this thread. Aren't they just neewbs or something? N33wbs? N00bs?

They use "newf*gs" on 4chan, I assume that word is banned here so the above posters are censoring it.

Re: Omegle 2009-2023

#435

Somewhere along the way I feel it became normal to just let your children do whatever they want online with no supervision and no parental controls. And at the same time I do think computer providers, Windows, Mac OS and all that don't offer good enough parental control. Age verification is a problem as well, but it's foolish to think every website and app will implement proper safeguards. I mean, Omegle could simply…

> Somewhere along the way I feel it became normal to just let your children do whatever they want online with no supervision and no parental controls.

I got handed a modem at age 9 and I started dialing into local BBSs.

I learned how to use paragraphs because I got made fun of for posting giant blocks of text.

The reason I wasn't using paragraphs initially is that they hadn't been taught to me yet in school.

A couple of years later I got on to the Internet proper.

In many ways it was wonderful. The optimism, the feeling that something amazing was happening. The hope that once everyone could talk to each other that a new era of global understanding could be reached.

At the age of 13 I was able to go on technical forums and if I put enough thought into what I said, my ideas were considered to be of no lesser or greater worth than the ideas put forth by others.

Although, back then the Internet was a bit more mature on average so I felt that I needed to at least try and put thought into what I said. (Not saying I always succeeded...)

> And parents must make sure to only let their kids use child accounts.

Or how about, when someone under 18 is using a computer, every hour a giant message appears on the screen "DON'T SEND NUDES TO ANYONE. NO MATTER WHAT THEY SAY. PS: ALSO DON'T BUY GIFT CARDS FOR ANYONE ONLINE."

That'd probably solve 60% of problems that underage users get into.

Jokes aside, I get it. The Internet is a worse place than when I first joined. But I'm more scared of kids running into curated video feeds that lead them down paths of extremism (e.g. red pill, gamergate) than I am of pedophiles.

Re: Omegle 2009-2023

#436

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> The question in my mind is, 74 million monthly users have a good time (or not bad enough to not come back, whatever) vs the inevitable catastrophic event as you say, isn’t it well worth it to accept the risk and continue? Assuming the 74 million are really getting lots of value from it, compensating the victims of the catastrophic event is more than worth it. Holding the host liable for the harms, and trusting the…

If it's actually very rare, that doesn't seem like an appropriate way to handle a free service. Imagine a store owner downtown adding a flowerbed and a couple benches at the front of their property. If someone gets hurt via rare catastrophic event, it seems bad to make the owner pay, and even worse to suggest they're supposed to be charging bench users 20 cents each to fund payouts like this.

The owner would probably need city approval to extend their reach onto municipal property (the sidewalk).

The store owner might also be required by the city and/or landlord to update their insurance policy to cover the extended liability.

But, in general, your proposed scenario never specified what the catastrophic event is and why the store owner would be held liable.

Re: Omegle 2009-2023

#437
post #419
post #332

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> it's turtles all the way down with nostalgia. And yet golden eras do occur, or so it would seem. I’m sure it’s hard to tell when you’re in or near one, which is an interesting topic in its own right, but it doesn’t mean we should dismiss outright the possibility that a passing era might just be taking something truly valuable with it.

Even a non-golden era can have something truly valuable. Btw, we are living in a golden age. The vast majority of humanity has never had it better.

> we are living in a golden age

I would've agreed pre-covid.

Re: Omegle 2009-2023

#439
post #182

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I went online in 1999 and it was almost always online DSL, so the idiots were just as bad back then. Those that didn't have DSL had AOL which is one click to get online

1999 is not early internet by any measure...

1999 is closer to the invention of the internet than present day

TCP/IP was standardized in 1982 and commercial ISPs didn't exist until 1989

Re: Omegle 2009-2023

#440
post #274

This brings back some amazing memories. If I remember correctly, the original inspiration for Omegle came from 4chan; or more precisely, a user thought of stretching the limits of "anonymous free speech" to realtime communications, and came up with the idea in late 2007. The PoC server for it was nothing more than "telnet to this IP" and it was sporadically advertised on 4chan for a short while. Astonishingly, Google…

God, they're complaining about newposters all the way back in 2007. Is the problem really Eternal September or is it just "kids these days"? Also Leif K-Brooks is a thoughtful person, and it bleeds into his posts I don't know why exactly I think a one on one chat system would be different from an imageboard. When one makes a post on an image or discussion board, I think one does take into account that his words are g…

>newposters all the way back in 2007

My recollection is that newposters was coined around 2007 for everyone who joined after the Habbo raids that had made /b/ much more popular. These newposters from Habbo were "ruining" the site.

Post reply on HN