Live data from Hacker News

I wish GPT4 had never happened

chaudhry.notion.site

431–440 of 1001 posts

Re: I wish GPT4 had never happened

#431
When automation, computers and offshoring were hollowing out the jobs of factory workers, miners and the low-to-medium skilled all we heard was "Learn to code!" from the laptop class of knowledge workers.

My advice to all the upper-middle-class professionals (teachers, lawyers, engineers, managers, accountants, doctors) out there who will soon be disintermediated by an LLM is "Learn to weld!"

Re: I wish GPT4 had never happened

#432
Whenever I hear stories about someone losing jobs due to a new technology, I would say capitalism and economics rather than technology is to blame here. Yes, you lost your job, but it's not like GPT4 made the decision to fire you, it's your boss who found a better alternative and decided that there is no need for he/she to pay you.

Re: I wish GPT4 had never happened

#433
In my experience with Chat GPT it usually gets things right 85% right.

But the last 15% is making sure things actually work, and Chat GPT simply can't do that. Your friend still is going to have a job, but she'll probably be made much more productive by AI tools. We're a long ways off from actually being able to depend on these tools for any reliable type of output.

Re: I wish GPT4 had never happened

#434
post #213

Hi everyone, author of the article here. I'm sorry if the article sounds overly pessimistic. I'm not making any claims with this article. I'm not proposing anything either. I do think technological progress is a good thing, even in this case. But I wrote this blog because I did have an emotional response to this technology, and wanted to pen down my thoughts. Its one thing to look at a report about the economic impac…

Have you asked Priya for her opinion about this? You've outlined the pessimistic case. Priya has qualifications in biotechnology. She currently spends her time doing work that sounds quite repetitive. If AI tools can help accelerate that work, is there a more optimistic scenario where she gets to do different, related work that isn't automatable? (I personally really hope the pessimistic case isn't what happens here,…

He has that covered IMO. He talks at length about how he's not confident about his own career in the long run. So while he starts off talking about the AI doing one person's job, he makes it clear that he doesn't just think that about entry level workers.

Re: I wish GPT4 had never happened

#435
post #259

> I don’t see a long-term career in software anymore. Any dreams I had of earning decent money as a software engineer are slowly fading. Lex Fridman in his podcast said “if you’re anxious about GPT4 its probably because you’re a shitty programmer”. I mean, I’m not the smartest in the room but I have generated value with the software I’ve made. And was convinced that I’ll make decent money as long as put in the work.…

The mediocre don't deserve to make a living?

Re: I wish GPT4 had never happened

#436

The big oversight here is that Priya does not want a job , what Priya wants is an income . The point of life is not working, the point of life is to enjoy it. We should strive to eliminate as many jobs as we possibly can, the less we have to work the better it is. To make this possible we need to find a way to a new system that doesn't directly link labour with income .

What a profoundly naive opinion. Most people find meaning, fulfillment, even contentment in working, especially when the problems are engaging and the solutions produce value. Many people claim their lives would be better if they never had to work, but they are bullshitting themselves with childhood naivete. Not working is a sucking void of boredom, nihilism, hedonism, and despair. I've been through some of that befo…

[deleted]

Re: I wish GPT4 had never happened

#437
I empathize with the demand change on jobs that AI will create. And its really difficult to predict what the future will be, not majorly for its uncertainty but mostly because the systems thinking we need to adapt to match this new era of reasoning based on what a probabilistic model say is good or not.

The main issue with "AI should never existed" is kind of the same of "go to a University to learn". We will look behind in 10-20 years and we will question why Universities were focusing in the wrong aspects of learning vs reasoning, creativity vs memorization.

This will affect every industry, every career, every person. The focus on the wrong side of the coin is creating the polarization of "good vs bad". Which is not far from what we have today. This is beyond, this is a new way of interacting with computers that is even more human only because it commoditize things that previously were totally own for some institutions, countries, or even just not public.

Re: I wish GPT4 had never happened

#438
Well, on the other hand, her friend should be able to produce the same content in a 1/15 or even 1/20 of her original time.

The more you know about a domain the better questions you can ask to chatgpt. What people do not get is that due to lack human's creativity it cannot innovate like a human does, it cannot create new knowledge, but it can let you know any existing field as long as you know what to ask.

Re: I wish GPT4 had never happened

#439

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Are you using 3.5 or 4? If 3.5, your experience is irrelevant since 4 is so much better.

"March 23 version"

4 costs money to use and the logo is black instead of light green. You’d know if you were using it.

Re: I wish GPT4 had never happened

#440

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"Work" above is being used in a more specific form than you are using it. GP is not referring to all productive work, they are specifically referring to employment on the market. Yes, human beings are better in relationships and better when they help each other, but GP is not talking about abolishing helping other people or doing meaningful things. There are a huge number of things people can do to meaningfully make…

I your work is not producing anything valuable for other people it's void and you will get bored pretty fast, it's a human nature. If it does you can always find a way to monetize it as people need it and ready to share their wealth for something they need. No, it doesn't have to be a work "for a company", but if you can't "make money off of this" it probably means your "work" is only relevant to you, or somebody els…

People who have enough wealth to not work for a living seem to manage their boredom pretty well.
Post reply on HN