Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I don't claim to speak for what most people want. I think having more options than iOS and Android could help promote more consumer-friendly choices. Using Linux on the phone with the lack of integration, the poor interface etc is the opposite of “consumer friendly”. Normal consumers are not asking for the ability to “program their phone and run media servers”. > Android is innovative because it is more open than i…
>> Using Linux on the phone with the lack of integration, the poor interface etc is the opposite of “consumer friendly”. Who said anything about using Linux on phones? I agree that a third smartphone platform would need to be user friendly. Whether based on Linux, OpenBSD, QNX, Symbian, or something is just a technical detail. >> Normal consumers are not asking for the ability to “program their phone and run media se…
If you ask 99%+ of phone users. They don’t care about a “closed” phone platform anymore than console owners care.
> iOS developers have been suffering and Apple has little reason it fix the issues: https://www.wired.com/story/apples-app-store-review-fix-fail...
And what percentage of iOS users that collectively making billions are “suffering”?
> Some organizations are trying to get "Open" smartphone marketplaces and more choice and competition in the markets:
And failing miserable. The market has spoken.
> Open standards and open markets encourage real competition and innovation.
And yet, it wasn’t “open standards” that brought any of the “innovations” to the market that users care about.
How many decades have Linux advocates been promising the “year of the Linux desktop”?