Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think this argument is misdirected. It's not that we can't accept the number of dead. Even at the top IFR of 1-2%, society could "stand" seeing that many dead. But that figure (the one you are comparing to the deaths from smoking) is with mostly functioning healthcare. It's with strict mitigations. Such mitigations aren't sustainable long term. Without those mitigations you'd be likely to have healthcare overload.…
What is preventing health care from being able to scale up? In the US, politicians, bureaucrats, and doctors have been working together for decades to artificially limit the number of doctors.[1] [1] https://qz.com/1676207/the-us-is-on-the-verge-of-a-devastati...
Obviously a plan that doesn’t help the first few years. So not useful in this pandemic, but perhaps something to think about.
I think your link is very US centric, this problem exists in the whole world (although the US isn’t alone in having a doctor shortage that could be called artificial).