Live data from Hacker News

It’s Time for Real Time Settlement

blog.robinhood.com

431–440 of 445 posts

Re: It’s Time for Real Time Settlement

#431
post #315

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> If that's true, then it's fundamentally broken (assuming interest bearing loans of course). You will never have a sustainable economic system that is based on interest bearing loans Yes we should all switch the current economic system which has been the root cause of societal development. And we should switch to a fairy-tail system which you describe but miraculously does not and has not ever existed. One where peo…

> switch the current economic system which has been the root cause of societal development Strawman argument, and red herring. Just because we rely on something immoral that brought some value does not mean that there isn't a superior solution. > switch to a fairy-tail system which you describe but miraculously does not and has not ever existed Proper Islamic finance exists and has existed and has built empires. > On…

I disagree with you on every point. Capitalism has lifted far more people out of poverty than charity. Its not even close.

Society should not remain poor and underdeveloped just to adhere to your religious beliefs. I just want to point out one last thing:

> It's very different. With an interest bearing loan, if the company doesn't work out, the lender will come after the borrower with the full support of the law, taking not only his principal, but the interest on top, destroying the latter. With an investment, if it doesn't work out, then the investor has lost his money and is not owed anything. It's risk sharing.

It's absolutely not different. A loan which receives interest in the form of equity is still interest. The lender provides capital in exchange for ownership over the company. Instead of being paid in cash, the lender is paid in equity that ideally becomes more valuable than the original loan amount. That is in no way a charitable act. Also you are not necessarily personally responsible for a loan to your business.

I bet you have never used a credit card, opened a savings account, worked for an employer that has debt, rented a home, rented a vehicle, bought a mortgage, taken a loan for education, made an investment, or ever have any relationship with a financial institution. /s

I'm still waiting for the name of a society that operated without debt or interest.

Re: It’s Time for Real Time Settlement

#432
post #425

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> switch the current economic system which has been the root cause of societal development Strawman argument, and red herring. Just because we rely on something immoral that brought some value does not mean that there isn't a superior solution. > switch to a fairy-tail system which you describe but miraculously does not and has not ever existed Proper Islamic finance exists and has existed and has built empires. > On…

> Proper Islamic finance exists and has existed and has built empires. What empires has it built since the Catholic church started allowing interest on loans? > if it doesn't work out, then the investor has lost his money and is not owed anything. It's risk sharing. That works fine for businesses and it's the reason we have the stock market and VC's. How does that work for someone buying a house?

> What empires has it built since the Catholic church started allowing interest on loans?

What does this discussion have to do with the Church? Islam is a separate religion and system, and up until relatively recently (post WWII mainly) the Muslim world was not involved in interest. Even post WWII, there existed nations that did not deal with it (e.g. Kosovo). Furthermore, just because someone decides to abandon their religion or morals does not mean that we have to do the same. We take pride that Islam is the only religion left in the world that is the way it was when it was revealed, without corruption.

> How does that work for someone buying a house?

Firstly, the government is responsible for providing a good quality of life for its citizens. Secondly, people can save money and buy, or buy in installments like they did back in the day and still do today in some parts of the world. Finally, owning a house is not an end goal, that's very materialistic thinking. I understand that it one has to secure his future, but home ownership as per the Western or American view wasn't the norm historically as far as I know. Today there exists governments that provide housing for their citizens (e.g. the UAE).

Re: It’s Time for Real Time Settlement

#433
post #431

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> switch the current economic system which has been the root cause of societal development Strawman argument, and red herring. Just because we rely on something immoral that brought some value does not mean that there isn't a superior solution. > switch to a fairy-tail system which you describe but miraculously does not and has not ever existed Proper Islamic finance exists and has existed and has built empires. > On…

I disagree with you on every point. Capitalism has lifted far more people out of poverty than charity. Its not even close. Society should not remain poor and underdeveloped just to adhere to your religious beliefs. I just want to point out one last thing: > It's very different. With an interest bearing loan, if the company doesn't work out, the lender will come after the borrower with the full support of the law, tak…

> Capitalism has lifted far more people out of poverty than charity. Its not even close.

This is not the argument. Islam does not prohibit all capitalistic practices, as a matter of fact, it's generally pro free market. All it does is it places some boundaries on unethical, immoral, and parasitic practices. Interest is one of those prohibited things. Everything else that is not prohibited goes. Furthermore, Islam pushes people to work and to be self sufficient and not rely on charity. https://sunnah.com/riyadussalihin:296

> Society should not remain poor and underdeveloped just to adhere to your religious beliefs

Strawman argument. The Islamic world during the Islamic Golden Age was prosperous and ahead of everyone in all facets of life, while the rest of the world was in the so called Dark Ages.

> Instead of being paid in cash, the lender is paid in equity that ideally becomes more valuable than the original loan amount.

The difference is in the contract. In an interest bearing loan, the lender is contractually owed a profit. This is not the case in a proper risk sharing model, where the investor is willing to accept a loss. Risk is shared proportionally among both parties. A borrower who defaults will have the lender come after him not just for the principal, but also for the accrued interest, with the full support of the law.

Incidentally, the Quran addresses your very claim that interest is the same as trade: https://quran.com/2/275.

It is very clear that interest is *not* the same as trading and ethical investments.

Renting a house or car is not an interest bearing transaction as I explain in another post here. One main difference is that a rented asset is consumed (e.g. subject to wear and tear), whereas "rented" money isn't. And since you're asking, yes I didn't take on a mortgage, nor opened a savings account (to be fair, the bank opened one for me, and I had to contact them repeatedly to close it).

Furthermore, we have narrations that there will come a time where even people who do not consume interest will be affected by it. We live in those times today, even dealing with fiat currency causes individuals to be affected by interest because it's money printed at will to cover the government's debts:

* https://sunnah.com/ibnmajah/12/142

* https://sunnah.com/mishkat:2818

> I'm still waiting for the name of a society that operated without debt or interest.

All throughout Islamic history until the fall of the Ottoman empire and the subsequent colonization by the West, which pushed its financial institutions in Arabia.

Re: It’s Time for Real Time Settlement

#434
post #431

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I disagree with you on every point. Capitalism has lifted far more people out of poverty than charity. Its not even close. Society should not remain poor and underdeveloped just to adhere to your religious beliefs. I just want to point out one last thing: > It's very different. With an interest bearing loan, if the company doesn't work out, the lender will come after the borrower with the full support of the law, tak…

> Capitalism has lifted far more people out of poverty than charity. Its not even close. This is not the argument. Islam does not prohibit all capitalistic practices, as a matter of fact, it's generally pro free market. All it does is it places some boundaries on unethical, immoral, and parasitic practices. Interest is one of those prohibited things. Everything else that is not prohibited goes. Furthermore, Islam pus…

> A borrower who defaults will have the lender come after him not just for the principal, but also for the accrued interest, with the full support of the law.

You have a very narrow understanding of loans. In fact, creditors lose money on loans all the time. Borrowers routinely escape paying out the entirety of their loans.

> Incidentally, the Quran addresses your very claim that interest is the same as trade: https://quran.com/2/275.

> It is very clear that interest is not the same as trading and ethical investments.

You logic is that because allah declares it so, then it must be true. It really is as simple as charging a fee for borrowing an asset. In the case of a cash loan, the asset is cash. You can perform all the mental gymnastics you want, but renting out a car or a property or capital is really all the same principle. You have drawn a silly distinction for equity based on your religion.

All the Islamic financial institutions still charge interest. They just use different names.

Re: It’s Time for Real Time Settlement

#435

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You might want to look into Amazon or “Hollywood accounting”

The fact that there are other examples of exploitation and fraud is tangential. The argument is that interest is one form of exploitation, it's not the only form.

My point is unequally shared risk is exploitation, but maal-e-ghanimat isn't?

Re: It’s Time for Real Time Settlement

#436
post #426

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Where are you reading that they would have gone bankrupt even with the trading restrictions they put in place?

Why else would they need an emergency $3.4B fund raise?

To keep up their margin requirements to allow GME trading.

If they had kept blocking GME buying, they wouldn't have needed the extra funds, but also would've pissed off their clients even more.

Re: It’s Time for Real Time Settlement

#437
post #142

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My understanding is that it does. One example (there's more like the instant deposit): when you buy a stock with money from another sale not yet settled, you are basically using margin (a loan) and thus RH have cash requirements which are a % of the cost of the trade to be settled. If you don't allow that, and only let people trade on a cash basis after the trades have been settled, you effectively have 100% of the m…

Robinhood isn't allowed to use your money as collateral with DTCC, they must use their own. That's why it doesn't matter what kind of account you have. Presumably their lack of trade fees hurts them here.

That does not seem right unless there is something more hidden going on:

1) I issue on order and close a trade (using a broker as intermediary) 2) i have already provided the liquidity to settle that trade which is already in the broker's control 3) why would the broker need to provide more liquidity to guarantee this trade?

I have the feeling what you say is true but only because there is some finance magic going on that nobody needs but the finance system.

I have tried to look for more information about this DTCC requeriment but couldn't find much.

Re: It’s Time for Real Time Settlement

#438
post #434

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Capitalism has lifted far more people out of poverty than charity. Its not even close. This is not the argument. Islam does not prohibit all capitalistic practices, as a matter of fact, it's generally pro free market. All it does is it places some boundaries on unethical, immoral, and parasitic practices. Interest is one of those prohibited things. Everything else that is not prohibited goes. Furthermore, Islam pus…

> A borrower who defaults will have the lender come after him not just for the principal, but also for the accrued interest, with the full support of the law. You have a very narrow understanding of loans. In fact, creditors lose money on loans all the time. Borrowers routinely escape paying out the entirety of their loans. > Incidentally, the Quran addresses your very claim that interest is the same as trade: https:…

> In fact, creditors lose money on loans all the time. Borrowers routinely escape paying out the entirety of their loans.

Just because some lenders lose money, does not make the contract any less predatory or immoral. That's like saying that there are some people who don't wear seatbelts and make it out of accidents without issues. The very fact that the US has trillions of dollars of student and auto and mortgage debt is more than enough to illustrate how much of a disaster usurious money lending is.

> In the case of a cash loan, the asset is cash.

I already explained how it's not the same. A tangible asset is consumed, experiences wear and tear, needs maintenance, etc. Money doesn't need any of that, you get back your asset in pristine condition, plus more.

> All the Islamic financial institutions still charge interest

If they do, then they're not Islamic, regardless if they claim they are. It's quite simple, and many scholars have called them out. Calling something prohibited by a different name to make it palatable is already mentioned in our books, and is outright prohibited. Dancing around the issue by stitching together a series of permissible contracts to result in something that mimics interest is prohibited. We have narrations about this.

The so called "Islamic banks" are a recent problem as I mention in another post. It's one of the many effects of post WWII colonization, where the West forced its values on the lands it occupied.

Re: It’s Time for Real Time Settlement

#439

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The fact that there are other examples of exploitation and fraud is tangential. The argument is that interest is one form of exploitation, it's not the only form.

My point is unequally shared risk is exploitation, but maal-e-ghanimat isn't?

Ghanayem is not unequally shared risk. People go to war for reasons, sacrifice their lives, and the winner takes bounties.

Re: It’s Time for Real Time Settlement

#440

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That debt, acquisition and paying of employees is fraud. You are just pushing the risk onto those other entities with poor price discovery.

Am I correct in reading that you think stock based acquisitions or employee compensation is all fraud?

If it exists in a market with illegalized downside pressure.

The sentiment that shorting isn’t necessary is particularly pernicious in the places where companies trade cash compensation for stock.

Employee long positions derived from stock grants are already boosts to the optimistic view of a company.

If there is no short position to determine fair pricing companies can use their already outsized advantage to take advantage of workers.

Post reply on HN