Live data from Hacker News

Google's Captcha in Firefox vs. in Chrome

grumpy.website

431–440 of 503 posts

Re: Google's Captcha in Firefox vs. in Chrome

#431

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So attackers cannot password spray. This is typically after attackers has gotten access to the latest database breach, and are just blindly trying username/password combinations. A simple ratelimit takes care of that. Plus, it's not like attackers would be easily defeated by a CAPTCHA anyway --- there are services selling batches of valid tokens, likely generated by actual humans or very close emulations thereof, for…

Rate limit by what? IP? Botnet traffic will originate at random IPs.

By the account. 3 failed login attempts in a row, and you disallow further logins for 30 seconds.

This should waste less time than reCAPTCHAs. I know it's not 1:1 in terms of pros/cons, but it gets a good subset of the advantages without the key disadvantages mentioned above.

Re: Google's Captcha in Firefox vs. in Chrome

#432

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Rate limit by what? IP? Botnet traffic will originate at random IPs.

By the account. 3 failed login attempts in a row, and you disallow further logins for 30 seconds. This should waste less time than reCAPTCHAs. I know it's not 1:1 in terms of pros/cons, but it gets a good subset of the advantages without the key disadvantages mentioned above.

So I can lock you out of your account with 3 attempts from any IP address?

Re: Google's Captcha in Firefox vs. in Chrome

#433
post #39

I was going through the same ordeal as a Firefox user, so I've made Buster to solve challenges and reclaim some of that lost time: https://github.com/dessant/buster If you're a developer, please consider replacing reCAPTCHA on your site with an alternative. reCAPTCHA discriminates against people with disabilities and those who seek privacy, and it gaslights you into thinking you did not solve the challenge correctly,…

The problem with recaptcha alternatives is that they either are insecure or require time and money to continue to be ahead of bots. All of the "interactive stand-alone approaches" from that page can be beaten with run-of-the-mill OCR (other than perhaps the 3d challenge) and with almost any mobile phone speech recognition engine (and, if the attacker has the money, can send it off to Google's cloud speech-to-text). A…

> and with almost any mobile phone speech recognition engine

My only problem with recaptcha is when audio doesn't work (google decides I'm spamming their network… sure…). Because their audio validation seems to use only one rule that says "letters where typed". So I'm not sure how being able to beat it with voice recognition makes it worse.

Re: Google's Captcha in Firefox vs. in Chrome

#434

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Rate limit by what? IP? Botnet traffic will originate at random IPs.

By the account. 3 failed login attempts in a row, and you disallow further logins for 30 seconds. This should waste less time than reCAPTCHAs. I know it's not 1:1 in terms of pros/cons, but it gets a good subset of the advantages without the key disadvantages mentioned above.

First, that's a bit user-hostile (and suddenly a DoS-vector; I can prevent a site's users from logging in by continuously firing bad password attempts).

Secondly, botnets can, and presumably do, randomize which accounts they try, too.

Re: Google's Captcha in Firefox vs. in Chrome

#435

I've never understood what happened to reCAPTCHA, it was originally so great and is now just so, so toxic. Originally it was an awesome solution based on OCR'ing books that usually worked quickly on the first try, and almost never took more than two. Then it turned into a single checkbox (analyzing mouse movement) so it was even faster... and I remember some simple image-based like "select the images of cats" that we…

I think two things happened: 1) Computer vision got a lot better over the past few years. It's also become way easier for the average Joe bot operator to run cutting-edge stuff. OCR tasks don't cut it for distinguishing people from machines any more. Every time I see a blog post about a new computer vision architecture or how some random developer trained a neural network to get an X% result on benchmark Y, I think t…

2) isn't true at all for me. I've always loved captcha and it has become a huuuuuge annoyance as soon as I'm using a vpn, tor, a weird wifi, a non-typical device, etc.

It is so freaking slow. I sometimes lose 60s to complete a captcha.

Re: Google's Captcha in Firefox vs. in Chrome

#437

Earlier quoted context omitted.

reCaptcha v3 works well for me. There are no challenges anymore and it just gives you a score based on whether it thinks the user is a bot/spammer, then you can do whatever with that. Personally if the score is low enough I just place the user in a restricted user group that needs approval on certain site actions.

Was just looking into using v3 today. Can you share what you consider to be low enough? I haven't seen any guidance on thresholds

Yeah I have the threshold set at 0.6. Anything below that gets put in the restricted usergroup.

Re: Google's Captcha in Firefox vs. in Chrome

#438

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not entirely accurate. The GDPR restricts the terms they can use, for example. And anti-discrimination law probably also applies. These don't really apply to captcha, of course, under current interpretations.

It's very easy to argue that CAPTCHA is an essential service and therefore not under GDPR. > anti-discrimination law Google-avoiders are not a protected class.

> It's very easy to argue that CAPTCHA is an essential service and therefore not under GDPR

No it isn't. In fact, out-of-the-box reCaptcha is not GDPR compliant, and using it on your site will open you up to possible liability. See https://complianz.io/google-recaptcha-and-the-gdpr-a-possibl...

My reCaptcha strategy is to fire off an email to the site owners every time I am subjected to a reCaptcha, asking for all my data under GDPR. Most websites only need a few such requests to quickly start looking for an alternative. Fuck Google and their constant attacks on my rights.

Re: Google's Captcha in Firefox vs. in Chrome

#439
post #91

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I thought recaptcha provided alternate domains/hosts not linked to Google so that you can use it in China. Is that not the case anymore?

if this is true, I'd love to hear the alternate! I use recaptcha and hate that my chinese customers need to do wacky stuff to circumvent it.

>I use recaptcha

Please consider not using recaptcha, it is the herpes of the web.

Re: Google's Captcha in Firefox vs. in Chrome

#440
post #39

I was going through the same ordeal as a Firefox user, so I've made Buster to solve challenges and reclaim some of that lost time: https://github.com/dessant/buster If you're a developer, please consider replacing reCAPTCHA on your site with an alternative. reCAPTCHA discriminates against people with disabilities and those who seek privacy, and it gaslights you into thinking you did not solve the challenge correctly,…

> reCAPTCHA discriminates against people with disabilities

It discriminates against people who value their time. Who in the right mind thinks that spending several minutes on captcha is ok?

Post reply on HN