Live data from Hacker News

The sad state of sysadmin in the age of containers (2015)

vitavonni.de

431–435 of 435 posts

Re: The sad state of sysadmin in the age of containers (2015)

#431
post #66
post #24

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I wish there was something like an updated Make, a tool that works for everything but updated to 2018. For instance Make works based on timestamps and therefore works very poorly together with git. Switch to another branch and you can get weird effects based on what files were updated and not and often trigger needless rebuilds. And everyone uses git these days. GNU Make, just using hashes instead of timestamps, woul…

> GNU Make, just using hashes instead of timestamps Sounds like you're describing make on a system with ccashe installed. Hashing incurs a significant performance hit. The first build with ccashe is 20% slower than building without it[1]. Your modern make would likely be slower for people who just build something from source once and aren't doing incremental development. https://ccache.samba.org/performance.html

ccache is just for c/c++..

Did you consider that it could be other things with ccache that makes it slow? E.g., the need to fully expand C headers and turn it into a text stream (NOT needed for a build tool).

Everything with git is lightning fast including operations that require a full directory tree diff / hash.

Re: The sad state of sysadmin in the age of containers (2015)

#432
post #416

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Basic concepts of promise theory (10 minute video by Mark Burgess who came up with it): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2TPsB5WuZgk 2014 introductory article: https://www.linuxjournal.com/content/promise-theory—what-it Basic book on the subject: https://www.amazon.com/Thinking-Promises-Designing-Systems-C... It's not "maths" like arithmentic but it's "maths" like graph theory: Promise Theory, in the context of inform…

> It's not "maths" like arithmentic but it's "maths" like graph theory It's less like graph theory and more like inversion of control: an architecture, not a set of theorems and their proofs. Even Burgess' own book you mentioned is nothing like a mathematical handbook. I'm a great fan of Mark Burgess and his promise theory, but calling it a mathematical theory or a mathematical domain is simply incorrect.

I hear you.

The book I mentioned (Thinking in Promises) is the introductory-level public book.

https://www.amazon.com/Promise-Theory-Principles-Application... is the heavy-duty scientific stuff.

"In Search of Certainty" (https://www.amazon.com/Search-Certainty-Science-Information-...) is somewhere in-between.

I would say promise theory is its own kind of logic and notation. Thanks for the correction @dozzie.

Re: The sad state of sysadmin in the age of containers (2015)

#433
post #408

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why is that sad?

Well, you said yourself: > I start getting into management. That’s a bit saddening Less one engineer in the world?

Oh! I’m not at all sad about getting into management; I’m saddened that I haven’t put the lower-level stuff I know (sort of) into good use in a while.

I want to go into management! We need more engineers in management!

Re: The sad state of sysadmin in the age of containers (2015)

#434

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Put devs on 24x7 escalation above your level-1 ("Is it actually broken?") NOC. Developer attitude would change immediately.

Sadly i have seen far too many devs go "you are holding it wrong"...

"You are holding your paycheck wrong"

Re: The sad state of sysadmin in the age of containers (2015)

#435
post #15

I'd love to see a revised version of this for 2018 (with fewer NSA tinfoil references).

You think NSA dissolved itself in the last 3 years?

Nothing about my comment implies that unless you are trying to be argumentative.
Post reply on HN