Live data from Hacker News

iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max

apple.com

421–430 of 434 posts

Re: iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max

#421

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Well, it might help that on day 1, I turned off the liquid glass effects in accessibility settings. At first there were several small layout / UI bugs that came from turning liquid glass off. But it seems fine now. I don't use the apple podcasts or music apps. (Overcast and Spotify for me). I haven't run into any serious problems.

iPhone 15 Plus: I have Reduced Transparency , Reduce Motion , and Prefer Cross-Fade Transitions , all enabled. You have to have Liquid Glass set to Clear for Reduce Transparency . I do use the Apple Podcasts app, but YouTube Music and DI.FM Radio apps for music. I never see any rendering issues / glitches, and the UI is smooth & snappy.

iphone 17 pro:

0. none of the options you describe really disable LG and the glitches it introduced.

1. you don't need to switch LG to clear to reduce transparency. you can use reduce transparency with any LG theme. you just need to reenable "reduce transparency" after changing the theme. why? ask Tim.

2. in Podcasts you can tap between Home and Library to see the selection jank around the middle New tab. happens every time.

and if you tap to change episode sorting oldest to newest, then change it back, it 100% of the time won't ever change back again, unless you exit and enter the show again.

and semi daily when switching to it from lock screen the now playing layout will be garbled, either just the bottom card or the entire now playing screen is empty (at which point i usually restart the app).

and of course janky layout shifts and adjustments when switching between screens like search, show, episode, transcript, etc (which additionally also all involve sliding motion despite reduce motion + prefer fade on, but i will let that slide)

the list goes on

Re: iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max

#422

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Images that sync to mac photos app instantly via wifi rather than half day via icloud.

You can almost achieve this by setting a reminder to turn on "sync immediately" manually every single day (because Apple decided there should be no permanent or indefinite option, and went through the extra effort of making it timed simply for the sake of inconvenience). I actually do this because it's the behavior I've wanted for years, and I care about it enough to go through the relentless annoyance.

I just don't understand why they wouldn't enable something p2p. We have handoff, screen mirroring, etc, but simple photo sync is impossible scientifically.

Re: iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max

#423

Earlier quoted context omitted.

- Top 4/6 links on HN are currently Apple news. Yeah Apple TOTALLY doesn't astroturf HN.

That doesn’t seem to be worth the effort to astroturf HN. We are not as important in Apple sales volume scale as you think we are.

There are endless posts on HN about how Macs are good for LLMs. Somoene is running some model on their Mac for local inference.

What the posts dont mention is how unusable that experience is with dogshit slow tokens/second. To make a local model usefull you need to run the highest parameter models at 100+ tok/sec, otherwise you are just better off paying for cloud inference. So either all those people are dumb as hell, or Apple is doing clever advertising. And I personally have more faith in the tech sector.

Re: iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max

#426
post #396

I love that it has a feature to prove images came from the real world: > Users can now prove the authenticity of a photo taken on iPhone 18 Pro models with Apple Reference Image, powered by the new sensor in the Main camera that can sign every pixel it sees. When a photo is taken in the new Reference mode, the camera captures signed sensor data that Private Cloud Compute develops into an unalterable reference image.5…

> I love that it has a feature to prove images came from the real world Congrats to Apple achieving nation-wide tracking, embedding some kind of yellow dots[1], but this time this time this is based on strong cryptography and non-removable, targeting people who don't use AI under the slogan "we are fighting AI fakes", but people still "love the feature". [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printer_tracking_dots

[deleted]

Re: iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max

#427
post #396

I love that it has a feature to prove images came from the real world: > Users can now prove the authenticity of a photo taken on iPhone 18 Pro models with Apple Reference Image, powered by the new sensor in the Main camera that can sign every pixel it sees. When a photo is taken in the new Reference mode, the camera captures signed sensor data that Private Cloud Compute develops into an unalterable reference image.5…

> I love that it has a feature to prove images came from the real world Congrats to Apple achieving nation-wide tracking, embedding some kind of yellow dots[1], but this time this time this is based on strong cryptography and non-removable, targeting people who don't use AI under the slogan "we are fighting AI fakes", but people still "love the feature". [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printer_tracking_dots

[deleted]

Re: iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max

#428

I'm finding it really hard to justify buying a new iPhone. They're so expensive these days for marginal improvements that seems if you're not an avid photo taker/media maker you don't get much back from.

If you're an avid photo taker, you need to buy a Pixel Pro.

Re: iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max

#429
post #171

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It would be great if they could use the LiDAR scanner to sign a depth map of the scene in front of the camera. It would show if you photographed a flat image.

If that became popular, the AIs would learn how to generate a realistic depth map along with any generated image.

[deleted]

Re: iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max

#430
post #171

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It would be great if they could use the LiDAR scanner to sign a depth map of the scene in front of the camera. It would show if you photographed a flat image.

If that became popular, the AIs would learn how to generate a realistic depth map along with any generated image.

> generate a realistic depth map along with any generated image.

There are already pretty good depth map generation algorithms (for a decade or so) which works on 2D images.

Generate the image, feed it to a depth map generator, viola.

However, you can't get it signed by the sensor itself. That'd be hard.

Post reply on HN