Live data from Hacker News

Zuckerberg 'Personally Authorized and Encouraged' Meta's Copyright Infringement

variety.com

421–430 of 484 posts

Re: Zuckerberg 'Personally Authorized and Encouraged' Meta's Copyright Infringement

#421

"You can be unethical and still be legal that’s the way i live my life" - Mark Zuckerberg

Note for the downvoters: this is literally what he said.

I downvoted because this was from an IM to a friend back in 2004, when Zuckerberg was twenty years old. I'm sure if you already hate him, this is so juicy and interesting, but I don't find 99.99% of the dumb shit young adults say to their friends in private conversations to be informative of almost anything.

Re: Zuckerberg 'Personally Authorized and Encouraged' Meta's Copyright Infringement

#422
post #93

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yup. All the headlines following the pattern "${billionaire} {gains|loses} ${x} billion this week" are mostly just fluff, the marginal share price of any given stock wanders all over the place even without forced sales or people trying to buy them out. There's some interesting exceptions, like how Musk has managed to sell Tesla shares totalling more or less as much as the business itself has made in total lifetime re…

It doesn't seem to be mostly just fluff to me. MacKenzie Scott (Jeff Bezos' ex wife) show it can be turned into real money. As of December 2025 She had given away $7.1 billion in 2025 charitable donations, and $26.3 billion since 2019. In reality there is the ability to execute on the shares to turn them into real money. Jeff Bezos holds less than 10% of Amazon stock himself. Which is a huge amount of money, and a no…

She is in fact on top of more value in shares than when she started giving away money.

Re: Zuckerberg 'Personally Authorized and Encouraged' Meta's Copyright Infringement

#423

Earlier quoted context omitted.

https://pluralistic.net/2025/04/23/zuckerstreisand/ Cory Doctorow wrote a nice summary of the Zuckerstreisand book by Sarah Wynn-Williams. "First, Facebook becomes too big to fail. Then, Facebook becomes too big to jail. Finally, Facebook becomes too big to care."

> Eventually, [Zuckerberg] manages to sit next to Xi at a dinner where he begs Xi to name his next child. Xi turns him down. That Mark never fails to deliver.

When I read that I felt bad for his then unborn child who was already being used by his father for pushing his nefarious business on to a dictator

Re: Zuckerberg 'Personally Authorized and Encouraged' Meta's Copyright Infringement

#424
post #408

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'd love for that to come out during discovery when the lawsuit hits, but it probably never will. Blowing the whistle is also not a great option in this economy, although I wish more people did.

If it wasn’t written down and there’s no recordings of it, hard to prove.

Given Zuckerberg's prevoius rounds in court, it's liktly to be in an email somewhere. Or maybe he's learned to have the incriminating_shit@facebook.com inbox only keep the latest 30 days or whatever.

Re: Zuckerberg 'Personally Authorized and Encouraged' Meta's Copyright Infringement

#425

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Note for the downvoters: this is literally what he said.

I downvoted because this was from an IM to a friend back in 2004, when Zuckerberg was twenty years old. I'm sure if you already hate him, this is so juicy and interesting, but I don't find 99.99% of the dumb shit young adults say to their friends in private conversations to be informative of almost anything.

Ordinarily I would agree, and I'm generally speaking not a fan of dredging up quotes from 20 years and holding people accountable to them.

I make an exception for Mark because he never changed his attitude or behavior, and if anything, he simply doubled down on it. I will never, ever, ever, EVER trust him to be a moral or ethical person.

Re: Zuckerberg 'Personally Authorized and Encouraged' Meta's Copyright Infringement

#426

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah, I dont know how anybody stays sane without it. I have a list of over a thousand ASNs I blackhole at this point... Mine is a daily bash cronjob that fetches a text-based database and uses grep to build an nftables-apply script with all the IPs for the blocked ASNs. I keep meaning to share it, but it's embarrassingly messy I haven't had time to clean it up...

It's been a real game of cat and mouse over the last few years. I used to do daily iptables updates to block repeat scrapers on my small niche stats site I run. About 5-6 ago it become more common to see broader ranges - so I started blocking ASNs which worked great (esp for the regulars like Alibaba, Tencent, compromised DigitalOcean/OVH, ...). In the last 2-3 years though the overall bot traffic has skyrocketed - i…

Arms races suck. I've managed to find a few L7 tricks to catch the residential proxies and serve them an empty 200, but there are obvious trivial workarounds on the other end and if I start talking about them in public they won't last long... I wish I could share :/

Re: Zuckerberg 'Personally Authorized and Encouraged' Meta's Copyright Infringement

#427

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes it is a different kind of worth, but it is not worth less because of it. This common argument to not take market cap valuations seriously doesn't hold. True, Meta as an entire entity is not liquid. A forced sale in entirety would produce a massive reduction in compensation. But that is a highly unlikely and contingent reduction. It is also true that if you have Meta's equivalent in cash, the value of the cash is…

Would it be accurate to say market cap valuations are intrinsically valuable because they drive people to buy shares by projecting success?

Having a market cap? You mean a non-zero market cap?

Or do you mean a greater vs. lesser market cap? As compared to what?

If market cap was intrinsic value underlying itself, the business would be irrelevant. That is a circular “origin” of value that even novice investors would want to sell out of. That doesn’t work.

Success that matters for investors isn’t evidenced by a high market cap. But by a market cap not keeping up with business growth. I.e. shares becoming undervalued. By actual/predicted growth increasing faster than cap, or cap falling faster than actual/predicted downturns.

Re: Zuckerberg 'Personally Authorized and Encouraged' Meta's Copyright Infringement

#428
The title of the article and the content of the article are not the same. Zuck has been accused, according to the article, but then the article itself basically says that Meta was pursuing licensing and then at some point the business unit responsible for pursuing that licensing was told not to, presumably because there was a fair-use strategy of some sort in place so licensing would not be required.

Re: Zuckerberg 'Personally Authorized and Encouraged' Meta's Copyright Infringement

#429

All those lawsuits against students who downloaded but didn't even redistribute mp3s. Less than a fair use transformation. Just the file download itself. ... Lesson learned: those students should have stolen millions instead!

Actually, it was the uploads that were a problem. Not downloads.

Re: Zuckerberg 'Personally Authorized and Encouraged' Meta's Copyright Infringement

#430
post #413

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There is zero evidence Trump informed the FBI about Epstein. Trump was Epstein's close friend for many years. There are many photos of Trump partying with Epstein and young women. It is impossible that Trump did not know what Epstein was up to. At a minimum, he knew about tremendous abuse of children and did nothing to stop it, despite being a wealthy and powerful man. At worst, he fully participated. Fuck you and yo…

There is evidence that Trump informed the FBI and local law enforcement about Epstein. You may not find it convincing, but the two aren’t mutually exclusive. History is an ordered list. Yes, Trump was friends with Epstein for a number of years. But then what happened? Yes, Trump knew Epstein was a creep. The documentation indicates that he did do something about it. You can yell at me and be rude all you’d like thoug…

If I was a rich and powerful person, and my rich friend was running a child sex trafficking ring, I would stop being friends with that person, immediately, once I knew about it.

It's extremely clear that Trump did not do that. He continued the friendship.

What would you do in that situation? I'd burn that friend to the ground, legally, socially, every way I could. I certainly wouldn't still be hanging around with him, talking about how cool he is, etc.

Your standards for human behavior suck.

Post reply on HN