$LLM spinup a jenkins cluster on my qa infrastructure please
Pricing Changes for GitHub Actions
421–430 of 853 posts
Re: Pricing Changes for GitHub Actions
#422Seriously. They're charging me for using MY cpus? Forgejo incoming testing period..
Like BYO wine I guess.
Re: Pricing Changes for GitHub Actions
#423Are there bring-your-own-agent CI platforms that don't have pricing structures like this? Buildkite and CircleCI do.
[deleted]
Re: Pricing Changes for GitHub Actions
#424Absolutely ridiculous. Just absolutely abhorrent and downright abusive move on Microsoft's part.
Re: Pricing Changes for GitHub Actions
#425Earlier quoted context omitted.
Codeberg's uptime is so bad, that it actually makes GitHub look good. ~96.5% over last 2 weeks [1] [1]: https://status.codeberg.org/status/codeberg
The operate on less than 100_000€/year, so I would cut them some slack ;-) btw. codeberg is not a company, more like a foundation, Verein is the german word.
I fail to see how this is relevant to the point I was making. With uptime being so low, it's not a viable alternative: budget / resources / etc. don't change that fact.
Don't get me wrong — I am glad that they are doing what they're doing, but it's a long way until it becomes a real alternative.
Re: Pricing Changes for GitHub Actions
#426This seems backwards. Why charge for me to run the thing myself instead of them?
I develop software, I also test and run it. All in my machines. But you (yes, you personally) have to collect the results and publish them to a webpage for me. For free. Would you make this deal?
It sounds like a bad deal right?
Except the alternative is I do this for free but also I'm doing all the testing and providing the hardware.
I'm only going to charge you if you do most of the work yourself
Re: Pricing Changes for GitHub Actions
#427Absolutely ridiculous. Just absolutely abhorrent and downright abusive move on Microsoft's part.
[dead]
Re: Pricing Changes for GitHub Actions
#428Earlier quoted context omitted.
Useless for Mac or Windows presumably.
self-hosted, so same story? I'm not a fan of nix and would have picked containers regardless for a git forge CI offering
It is containers. It's based on Nixery, which is a virtual Docker registry where it puts together containers for you on the fly containing whatever packages you want from Nixpkgs.
Re: Pricing Changes for GitHub Actions
#429This is a serious issue. How is it possible for GitHub/Microsoft to charge me for using my own machine as a self-hosted GitHub Actions runner?
I'll be investigating gitlab tomorrow
Re: Pricing Changes for GitHub Actions
#430Earlier quoted context omitted.
Am I right in assuming it’s not the amount of payment but the transition from $0 to paying a bill at all? I’m definitely sure it’s saving me more than $140 a month to have CI/CD running and I’m also sure I’d never break even on the opportunity cost of having someone write or set one up internally if someone else’s works - and this is the key - just as well. But investment in CI/CD is investing in future velocity. The…
You're sounding a lot like a Microsoft damage control artist.
The only company I’ve held a grudge against longer than MS is McDonalds and they are sort of cut from the same cloth.
I’m also someone who paid for JetBrains when everyone still thought it wasn’t worth money to pay for a code editor. Though I guess that’s again now. And everyone is using an MS product instead.