Have a meeting today with our AWS account team about how we’re no longer going to be “All in on AWS” as we diversify workloads away. Was mostly about the pace of innovation on core services slowing and AWS being too far behind on AI services so we’re buying those from elsewhere. The AWS team keeps touting the rock solid reliability of AWS as a reason why we shouldn’t diversify our cloud. Should be a fun meeting!
This. When Andy Jassy got challenged by analysts on the last earnings call on why AWS has fallen so far behind on innovation in areas his answer was a hand wavy response that diverted attention to say AWS is durable, stable, and reliable and customers care more about that. Oops.
AWS multiple services outage in us-east-1
421–430 of 1001 posts
Re: AWS multiple services outage in us-east-1
#422Re: AWS multiple services outage in us-east-1
#423Re: AWS multiple services outage in us-east-1
#424Re: AWS multiple services outage in us-east-1
#425My minor 2000 users web app hosted on Hetzner works fyi. :-P
But how are you going to web scale it!? /s
Seriously, this thing runs already on 3 servers. A primary + backup and a secondary in another datacenter/provider at Netcup. DNS with another AnycastDNS provider called ClouDNS. Everything still way cheaper then AWS. The database is already replicated for reads. And I could switch to sharding if necessary. I can easily scale to 5, 7, whatever dedicated servers. But I do not have to right now. The primary is at 1% (sic!) load.
There really is no magic behind this. And you have to write your application in a distributable way anyway, you need to understand the concepts of stateless, write-locking, etc. also with AWS.
Re: AWS multiple services outage in us-east-1
#426Re: AWS multiple services outage in us-east-1
#427Just a couple of days ago in this HN thread [0] there were quite some users claiming Hetzner is not an options as their uptime isn't as good as AWS, hence the higher AWS pricing is worth the investment. Oh, the irony. [0]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45614922
> 99.99% uptime infra significantly cheaper than the cloud.
I guess that's another person that has never actually worked in the domain (SRE/admin) but still wants to talk with confidence on the topic.
Why do I say that? Because 99.99% is frickin easy
That's almost one full hour of complete downtime per year.
It only gets hard in the 99.9999+ range ... And you rarely meet that range with cloud providers either as requests still fail for some reason, like random 503 when a container is decommissioned or similar
Re: AWS multiple services outage in us-east-1
#428Every week or so we interview a company and ask them if they have a fall-back plan in case AWS goes down or their cloud account disappears. They always have this deer-in-the-headlights look. 'That can't happen, right?' Now imagine for a bit that it will never come back up. See where that leads you. The internet got its main strengths from the fact that it was completely decentralized. We've been systematically erodin…
Planning for an AWS outage is a complete waste of time and energy for most companies. Yes it does happen but very rarely to the tune of a few hours every 5-10 years. I can almost guarantee that whatever plans you have won’t get you fully operational faster than just waiting for AWS to fix it.
I presume this means you must not be working for a company running anything at scale on AWS.
Re: AWS multiple services outage in us-east-1
#429As Amazon moves from day-1 company as it claimed once, to be the sales company like Oracle focusing on raking money, expect more outages to come, and longer to be resolved. Amazon is burning and driving away the technical talent and knowledge knowing the vendor lock-in will keep bringing the sweet money. You will see more sales people hoovering around your c-suites and executives, while you will face even worse techn…