Find SF parking cops
421–430 of 498 posts
Re: Find SF parking cops
#422Top comment might be inaccurate now - it seems that the site is showing recent data again (as recent as 24 minutes ago).
Re: Find SF parking cops
#423Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm being downvoted by being anything less then apologetically polite while expressing a viewpoint that isn't pro whatever the lowest common denominator wants. That's just how comment sections that keep "rightthink score" are.
I couldn't downvote your direct reply to me, but if I could have I would have because you're being an ass. Calling me "perverted" because I don't think people should block bike lanes says way more about you than me.
Re: Find SF parking cops
#424Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm being downvoted by being anything less then apologetically polite while expressing a viewpoint that isn't pro whatever the lowest common denominator wants. That's just how comment sections that keep "rightthink score" are.
You might be downvoted regardless, as you suggest, but the guidelines are still the social contract of HN. What you call "less than apologetically polite" I would call "not kind" and "snarky." Did you feel kindness toward the gp when you replied? If you think you're actually following the guidelines, then you must carry on.
Re: Find SF parking cops
#425Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm being downvoted by being anything less then apologetically polite while expressing a viewpoint that isn't pro whatever the lowest common denominator wants. That's just how comment sections that keep "rightthink score" are.
You might be downvoted regardless, as you suggest, but the guidelines are still the social contract of HN. What you call "less than apologetically polite" I would call "not kind" and "snarky." Did you feel kindness toward the gp when you replied? If you think you're actually following the guidelines, then you must carry on.
Re: Find SF parking cops
#426Earlier quoted context omitted.
They keep that data for themselves, they don’t even tell you how much data they have on you. Why is it unfair that they also be tracked?
It might be fair, but is it a good idea? What you are doing is justifying something you wouldn't agree with because it targets people belonging to an organization doing the thing you don't agree with. That is can be problematic because 1. They now can say 'well it is done to us why can't we do it to others' instead of engaging with real arguments about using ALPR flock cameras to track people 2. You assume that a per…
Re: Find SF parking cops
#427Earlier quoted context omitted.
I couldn't downvote your direct reply to me, but if I could have I would have because you're being an ass. Calling me "perverted" because I don't think people should block bike lanes says way more about you than me.
Not wanting the bike lanes blocked is fine. The problem is that you want, as a means to this end, 100% enforcement of laws that were never written nor were their punishments apportioned with the expectation of such with zero regard for the consequences. That is a bad thing to be advocating for over such a mundane issue and I think it's belies a lack of moral character you often see in this subject of discussion (thou…
Re: Find SF parking cops
#428Re: Find SF parking cops
#429Incredible work. I'm disappointed to see so many of the leaderboard items are street cleaning tickets. I get it - street cleaning are "easy" tickets to write in bulk, and therefore efficient ROI for PCO time, but they're not the most important violations to cite compared to safety-critical things like blocked bike lanes (which SFMTA has an official policy to completely ignore citizen reports thereof), double-parking,…
Re: Find SF parking cops
#430I would pay ~$10/month for email alerts when an officer is within a geofence of my car.
Then someone will know where your car is at all times, and probably who you are... and that is monetizable (not from you).