Earlier quoted context omitted.
Holy cow was that forecast bad! It reminds me of a meeting long ago where the marketing team reported that oil was going to hit $400/bbl and that this would be great for business. I literally laughed out loud. At that price, gasoline would be about $18/gal and no one could afford to move anything except by ox cart.
> At that price, gasoline would be about $18/gal and no one could afford to move anything except by ox cart. Just for some rough math here - I’m currently paying around $1.20/L for gas, and crude oil cost is roughly half of that, so if crude went up by 6x, I’d be looking at $5/L for gas. Gas is currently about 20% of my per-km cost of driving, so that price increase at the pump would increase my per-km cost by about…
I convinced HP's board to buy Palm and watched them kill it
421–430 of 517 posts
Re: I convinced HP's board to buy Palm and watched them kill it
#422Earlier quoted context omitted.
> At that price, gasoline would be about $18/gal and no one could afford to move anything except by ox cart. Just for some rough math here - I’m currently paying around $1.20/L for gas, and crude oil cost is roughly half of that, so if crude went up by 6x, I’d be looking at $5/L for gas. Gas is currently about 20% of my per-km cost of driving, so that price increase at the pump would increase my per-km cost by about…
The issue isn't person transport it is shipping and home heating and agriculture I drive electric so like to imagine myself sheltered from gas price increases but I know grocery costs would explode
Re: I convinced HP's board to buy Palm and watched them kill it
#423Earlier quoted context omitted.
The price was likely too high, though that is debatable. However the real take away is if you want something like this to work out you need to invest in to for years. There is nothing wrong with getting the size of the market wrong by that much - it happens too often for anyone to call it wrong. It isn't clear what was predicted, but marketing should have predicted a range of units sold (and various price points havi…
> There is nothing wrong with getting the size of the market wrong by that much Remember that the Apple Watch did this. The initial release was priced way outside of market conditions--it was being sold as a luxury-branded fashion accessory at a >$1k price point on release. It was subtly rebranded as a mass-affordable sports fitness tracker the next year.
Re: I convinced HP's board to buy Palm and watched them kill it
#424Earlier quoted context omitted.
Were they used to be great? I definitely remembered HP having a very bad reputation even back then. Like every time a ridiculous printer feature that costs user’s money it was HP.
My first inkjet printer was an HP DeskJet in the mid-90s. It was rock solid. At that time, HP printers were the best consumer printers on the market, with a reasonable price/quality balance. HP also had a good brand image due to its servers (HP PA-RISC) and calculators (like the HP 48GX). They started to go downhill when they made big acquisitions like Compaq and Palm, and the Itanium architecture failed. It's like I…
Re: I convinced HP's board to buy Palm and watched them kill it
#425Earlier quoted context omitted.
A CTO shouldn’t be “hoping”, a CTO should have been influencing those decisions (including pricing) all along. If he only realized the price was wrong when the product hit the shelves (while he was in bed recovering), then he has no place in lecturing others on their lack of strategic perspective.
I don't think there's a world where you can hold the CTO responsible here. I get his colleagues anger and understand it. That said, this is IMO as clear cut as you can get for a case of absolutely ludicrously poor decisionmaking on the part of Apotheker. Bad strategy from bad principles, brought in from an unrelated and way smaller company. I genuinely can't fathom doing such a radical pivot with a business that size…
These kinds of folks only seem to fail upwards in the EU, whereas in the US, they would have been laughed out.
Re: I convinced HP's board to buy Palm and watched them kill it
#426Earlier quoted context omitted.
That open ecosystem needs years of investment to develop. A few people will take the risk and make a first app, but a lot will wait longer.
I think you're genuinely forgetting how starved people were for phone applications when these devices first came on the market. Developers were absolutely willing to make the investment. Billions of devices were about to come online.
Re: I convinced HP's board to buy Palm and watched them kill it
#427(This isn't a joke or sarcasm, I genuinely thought both HP and HPE are hardware companies?)
Re: I convinced HP's board to buy Palm and watched them kill it
#428Earlier quoted context omitted.
About the time they sold off their test instrumentation division they start sucking royally. Agilent still makes great stuff though.
TIL that Agilent was still in business. I thought it was a straight name-change to Keysight for their electronic test equipment business.
Re: I convinced HP's board to buy Palm and watched them kill it
#429Earlier quoted context omitted.
Windows phones were incredible, the OS was the most responsive at the time by far. No apps though. They were building in Android app support when they pulled the plug.
My experience with Windows phone around 2010 was exact opposite, very slow and clumsy. I recall I tried a HTC phone on WM 6.5, far behind iPhone 3GS
WP7 was the first of the new OS
Re: I convinced HP's board to buy Palm and watched them kill it
#430> "Then, in late June 2011 […] I faced a medical emergency requiring immediate surgery and a eight-week recovery period confined to bed. […] On July 1, 2011, HP launched the TouchPad tablet running WebOS 3.0 […] The launch was botched from the start. HP priced the TouchPad at $499 to compete directly with the iPad, but without the app ecosystem or marketing muscle to justify that premium. The device felt rushed to ma…