Live data from Hacker News

Twitter has officially changed its logo to ‘X’

techcrunch.com

421–430 of 1001 posts

Re: Twitter has officially changed its logo to ‘X’

#421
post #10

You know, for all the talk about how twitter is going downhill and making stupid decisions, this is the only one so far that really, really, does seems stupid. Verification was bad and now it’s a joke, api rate limits have some possible argument etc - but why in the hell buy a household name just to change it? Why not build X from scratch?

Probably X fits into the story then, for most of us seeing an X means "close this window".

Re: Twitter has officially changed its logo to ‘X’

#422

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Another stupid play is to merge verification with membership. I thought he would add a new membership tier along blue check mark to have some extra income. Instead he actually chose the bizarre route and sabotaged the verification. Maybe he is really being paid by the Saudis to intentionally ruin Twitter to reduce the freedom of speech

Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.

Malicious people love it!

Re: Twitter has officially changed its logo to ‘X’

#423
post #407

Interesting thread today. I see lots of haters here in the comments. While you all very well may be right about his future failure with Twitter, I think it’s important to highlight that Musk is very different from most people in that he looks like he’s failing until he succeeds, and he’s done that with just about every company he’s run. Twitter make look like a dumpster fire now, but based on past history, I’m bettin…

> in that he looks like he’s failing until he succeeds

Is that true? When I look at very old SpaceX or Tesla posts on HN the comments are generally very positive on product direction.

Re: Twitter has officially changed its logo to ‘X’

#424
post #242

This man is burning anything that had any value at Twitter. From an extremely valuable list of verified users to the name which is even used as a verb. There is absolutely no reason to rename Twitter. The name isn't even that stained compared to like Comcast or what ever the name was of that phone company in the 90s that sucked so bad it was renamed.

Yes, but HE has always loved the name X for a brand. He also wanted it for PayPal. He put it in SpaceX. And if he loves X, everybody else surely does too, so he's a genius for rebranding Twitter to X. I'm sure that's roughly his line of thought.

He even named his child “X Æ A-12”

Re: Twitter has officially changed its logo to ‘X’

#425
post #170

A common saying amongst rich family dynasties is 'The first generation builds the business, the second makes it a success, and the third wrecks it'. Elon seems to be trying hard to break that rule, as he seems to be working to achieve all of this in a single generation.

Elizabeth Holmes, Bernie Madoff and Sam bankman freid have entered the chat.

Re: Twitter has officially changed its logo to ‘X’

#426

This man is burning anything that had any value at Twitter. From an extremely valuable list of verified users to the name which is even used as a verb. There is absolutely no reason to rename Twitter. The name isn't even that stained compared to like Comcast or what ever the name was of that phone company in the 90s that sucked so bad it was renamed.

The sheer genius of throwing away the brand of one of a handful of companies that has a phrase that has entered common parlance: hoover it up, google it, and tweet it.

Feels like Musk has caught some of the PriceWaterhouseCoopers 'Introducing Monday' nonsense. At least we could attribute that to the dotcom madness.

Re: Twitter has officially changed its logo to ‘X’

#429

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There are probably hundreds of thousands (millions?) of websites out there that have the twitter bird logo at the bottom either to direct link people to share the article or maybe a link to the profile of the author or whatever. They are never going to change to the X logo.

Aren’t those little share buttons served via a CDN or third party anyway? All you need to do is swap out the image that the URL points to and any site that uses that URL suddenly starts serving the new image.

In a perfect world, yes. But I'm pretty sure the majority of websites uses something that isn't quite "off the shelf".
Post reply on HN