421–430 of 456 posts
> If humans stop producing new content and rely solely on AI, online content across the world may run the risk of becoming repetitive and stagnant. Yeah, because the Netflix catalog, for example, is not repetitive and stagnant. These current advances will enable anybody with a unique idea to produce content. We are right before an immense explosion of human creativity.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think some of it comes from the smug disdain that generative art fans throw at traditional artists.
If anything, that smug disdain is a reflection of the perceived elitism of traditional artists. A small culture war that was smouldering long before the appearance of generative models.
1. There is nothing to stop someone putting this on >10%-AI generated material. 2. The same argument could be made for "Not with a Computer" and invalidate this website based on identical principles. 3. The future AI brings is a huge unknown, but as we've seen with every major technological advance so far, it's never been nearly as bad as the most fearful and skeptical thought it would be at the time this was unknown…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
But still, content creators get badges/s I generally agree that it will become increasingly harder to distinguish non-AI generated content and authenticity will suffer a lot. Maybe the solution to this is get connected with other humans directly and provide authenticity as first hand experience.
From consumer’s perspective they don’t care where it came from. In commercial setting(read: 99%) it’s always get stuff cheaper and better. AIGC fits both, the only better options is run faster than the waves and hope it don’t take you(i.e. “learn to code”) This is the “disruption” we tech and VC has been talking XR/Crypto/5g/metaverse is about. Except it came with large body counts for those who are directly impacted…
I want a "Created by AI" badge for my social media content, because I want to show off my skills with creating AI content (and educate users about what they are consuming).
An analog to the sudden belated question of the extent to which human language is novel (or not), is a precursor to a more existential revelation our culture is going to have, the extent to which the entire precept of the rational self-aware agent that we carry as our model of ourselves, is a confabulated falsehood maintained by our own minds. Most of what most of us do most of the time is habitual, instinctual, auto…
Is it really that black and white? What if you do your offline research using AI? What if you took a course about the topic on Khan Academy aided by AI?
"Made in America" vibes. It must be better because we made it... There's a sort of insecurity about this. And I get it, people are freaking out. I feel unsettled in many ways and I truly believe this technology is profound. Wait until it's realtime and embedded in everything. But I don't believe it's a cause for concern. I don't think we need to legislate transformers trained on public data as something illegal, for…
I may never understand the appeal that luddism has to certain people.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
They don't have a default voice not a definite one. Output can be easily adjusted to sound like whatever
Not effectively in my experience. Even if I ask it for a discursive treatment in the style of William F. Buckley I always seem to get what reads like a transcript of Entertainment Tonight.