Live data from Hacker News

Using the same Arch Linux installation for a decade

meribold.org

421–422 of 422 posts

Re: Using the same Arch Linux installation for a decade

#421
post #179

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Debian is considered stable because apart from security updates package versions are set in stone til the next release, so there won't be any surprises. which is not what the rest of the world means by "stable" when talking about software, so there is in practice a lot of surprise for users coming to Debian when they hear "stable" thinking that it means "no bugs" when it actually means "no changes"

stable, by dictionary definition, means "not changing or fluctuating", no bugs would be "bug free", there is no "bug free" distro.

To be fair, "stable" also means "can stand up without falling over", which in a computer context gives it the secondary meaning (besides "unchanging") of "doesn't crash", which is very easily interpreted by the layman as "not beset by bugs that make it crash".

Re: Using the same Arch Linux installation for a decade

#422
post #184

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What i've discovered is you really need to buy and/or install a bunch of 3rd party applications to get that horrible UI to work in any usable fashion.

I've seen a lot of people recommend this approach when searching for solutions online. I was trying to embrace the apple way, rather than forcing it to match what I'm used to. Your comment might be the push I need to just give up and force it to match what I'm used to. But if this is the case, why do so many developers buy and enjoy macbooks? It seems ridiculous that you have to pay such a premium for a nice laptop,…

> I was under the impression that macbooks would "just work".

It's just a matter of redefining "just works" as "just works, as long as I adapt my workflow and UI preferences to The One True Apple Way".

Post reply on HN