Let's hope it's permanent.
Of all the big tech companies Facebook is the only one where it can completely disappear overnight and my life would be completely unaffected (or possibly improved by not having to explain to people I don't use facebook, please email or text me your invitations rather than use messenger). If Google, Amazon, Netflix, Apple disappeared the story would be completely different.
Facebook-owned sites were down
421–430 of 1001 posts
Re: Facebook-owned sites were down
#422Ironic enough; status.fb.com also down.
and / or an S3 bucket with a json blob the apps can pull to at least tell users 'here's what's up'
Re: Facebook-owned sites were down
#423Earlier quoted context omitted.
I like how FB decided to send "ramenporn" as their spokesperson.
A particular facet I love of the internet era is journalists reporting serious events while having to use the completely absurd usernames... "A Facebook engineer in the response team, ramenporn..."
Re: Facebook-owned sites were down
#424Let's hope it's permanent.
> "Ok." - Zuckerburg
shuts down $100B company
Re: Facebook-owned sites were down
#425Earlier quoted context omitted.
I like how FB decided to send "ramenporn" as their spokesperson.
I'm worried about that person. I doubt Facebook will look kindly on breaking incident news being shared on reddit.
Re: Facebook-owned sites were down
#426Is it just me or HN also feels kinda laggy?
Re: Facebook-owned sites were down
#427Earlier quoted context omitted.
Signal had their own share of downtime. How about going to a federated system instead of repeating the same mistakes? ( https://matrix.org )
But still a part would be down, if a server has an outage. How about a system, where every device that is used for chatting is a server at the same time? I wonder whether something like that already exists. Bundle it together with bigger servers to handle the load. If the bigger servers experience outages, the service can still continue, although a bit slower
Re: Facebook-owned sites were down
#428Facebook being down makes me think of all of those small businesses who never built websites. They rely on traffic and publicity from their Facebook pages only. It's so important to diversify, such as building a website.
Re: Facebook-owned sites were down
#429Reddit r/Sysadmin user that claims to be on the "Recovery Team" for this ongoing issue: > As many of you know, DNS for FB services has been affected and this is likely a symptom of the actual issue, and that's that BGP peering with Facebook peering routers has gone down, very likely due to a configuration change that went into effect shortly before the outages happened (started roughly 1540 UTC). There are people now…
> the people with physical access is separate from the people with knowledge of [...] Welcome to the brave new world of troubleshooting. This will seriously bite us one day.
Re: Facebook-owned sites were down
#430Reddit r/Sysadmin user that claims to be on the "Recovery Team" for this ongoing issue: > As many of you know, DNS for FB services has been affected and this is likely a symptom of the actual issue, and that's that BGP peering with Facebook peering routers has gone down, very likely due to a configuration change that went into effect shortly before the outages happened (started roughly 1540 UTC). There are people now…
Wondering how Facebook communicates now internally - most of their work streams likely depend on Facebooks systems which are all down. Can engineers and security teams even access prod systems anymore? Like, would "Bastion" hosts be reachable? Wonder if they use Signal and Slack now?