Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

The growing body of evidence that digital distraction is damaging our minds

theglobeandmail.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

421–430 of 478 posts

Re: The growing body of evidence that digital distraction is damaging our minds

#421

Post by TeMPOraL »

donkeyd wrote: post #420
wst_ wrote: post #405

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Has it?

Yeah, it has, apparently: https://adaa.org/learn-from-us/from-the-experts/blog-posts/c... The idea of a fully private social media profile actually scares my half-sister, since it would mean less likes on her posts, so her friends would get more. We had a conversation about this and the way she reacted wasn't pretty.

> The idea of a fully private social media profile actually scares my half-sister

Not commenting on the motivations of your half-sister, but the very concept of a "fully private social media profile" makes zero sense, since social media is what you engage in to share stuff with lots of people. Compare with "fully private blog".

Re: The growing body of evidence that digital distraction is damaging our minds

#423

Post by tbrownaw »

TeMPOraL wrote: post #421
donkeyd wrote: post #420

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah, it has, apparently: https://adaa.org/learn-from-us/from-the-experts/blog-posts/c... The idea of a fully private social media profile actually scares my half-sister, since it would mean less likes on her posts, so her friends would get more. We had a conversation about this and the way she reacted wasn't pretty.

> The idea of a fully private social media profile actually scares my half-sister Not commenting on the motivations of your half-sister, but the very concept of a "fully private social media profile" makes zero sense, since social media is what you engage in to share stuff with lots of people. Compare with "fully private blog".

Compare with "fully private blog".

It's called a diary or a journal.

Re: The growing body of evidence that digital distraction is damaging our minds

#424

Post by vog »

rabidrat wrote: post #278
EADGBE wrote: post #260

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No. Throw the baby out with the bathwater; they said. I've deleted and re-installed Facebook countless times. It doesn't make me any holier, but having the choice of it there and choosing to go without seems like a stronger fight.

That's true, the general recommendation for drug addicts is to keep their drug of choice in their home and within an arm's reach, so that they can exercise their willpower for the sake of the stronger fight. Someday you'll be strong enough to break free! Keep at it!

> the general recommendation for drug addicts is to keep their drug of choice in their home and within an arm's reach, so that they can exercise their willpower for the sake of the stronger fight

Is that really true? Where did you get that from?

It's exactly the opposite about I've learned about how to help drug addicts.

There is, however, the advice that for drugs which can't be quickly reduced to zero for medical reasons, those should be stowed by a close friend (depending on the situation), who then ensures the dosis is reduced over time in a proper way. The advantage is that the reduction of dosis is enforced by other person, and that if the addict temporarily needs a higher dosis for specific reasons, they might get it, but first have to discuss another person.

Re: The growing body of evidence that digital distraction is damaging our minds

#426

Post by rocho »

jakobegger wrote: post #207
DamnInteresting wrote: post #159

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I am terrified about giving smartphones to my kids. Hey smartphone makers, if you're listening: Let me set an alternate PIN that unlocks the phone in a limited access mode, or "kid mode." Only pre-approved apps are available. Only pre-approved contacts can be called/texted. In-game purchases require the more secure PIN. Maybe when the phone is in this mode I can track its location easily, and make it emit a noise.…

I‘m pretty sure Apple won‘t do that, because they want you to buy your kids their own iPhone. Why doesn‘t the iPad have this sort of multi-user mode? An iPad is the perfect device for sharing. But no, if you don‘t want your kids to read your emails, you need to buy them their own iPad.

Android has had multi-user accounts for months or years now (I can't remember exactly when it was introduced).

Re: The growing body of evidence that digital distraction is damaging our minds

#427

Post by ppbutt »

Just a personal anecdote here: I live with my brother and most days, from the time he comes home from work to the time he goes to bed is mostly spent glued to his phone. Hard or impossible to talk to him while he's on it. He's mostly on Instagram and silly games - sometimes Bumble or whatever. Nice guy but gets flustered and/or puts me on hold (indefinitely) when I try to talk to him. He's a couple years older than me - in his late 20's.

I've tried talking to him about it, saying I can hardly talk to him (if ever) and he completely defends his position, saying he uses phone to keep in touch with friends, notifications admitedly feel good, etc.

Any suggestions?

Re: The growing body of evidence that digital distraction is damaging our minds

#428

Post by donkeyd »

TeMPOraL wrote: post #421
donkeyd wrote: post #420

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah, it has, apparently: https://adaa.org/learn-from-us/from-the-experts/blog-posts/c... The idea of a fully private social media profile actually scares my half-sister, since it would mean less likes on her posts, so her friends would get more. We had a conversation about this and the way she reacted wasn't pretty.

> The idea of a fully private social media profile actually scares my half-sister Not commenting on the motivations of your half-sister, but the very concept of a "fully private social media profile" makes zero sense, since social media is what you engage in to share stuff with lots of people. Compare with "fully private blog".

Fully private wasn't really the right description. What I meant was only accepting people she actually knows. In stead of anybody who sends her a friend request. She has a couple thousand 'friends' now.

Re: The growing body of evidence that digital distraction is damaging our minds

#429

Post by bjourne »

seangrogg wrote: post #293
bjourne wrote: post #232

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Of course it is about moderation, but how can you moderate yourself when there is an infinite supply available? If my fridge contained an infinite supply of chocolate and ice cream I'd get so fat so fast...

I'd likely do the same if those were the only things that existed in infinite quantities, but if said fridge also contained equally infinite meats and cheeses I'd be more likely to stick to a diet and reach goals I'd set for myself and just ignore the sweets unless I declared a cheat day. Then again, I'm also the sort that has a phone in front of me and spends more time on HN, Quora, and in coding/interest-related di…

Are you sure browsing hn and quora are productive uses of your time?

Re: The growing body of evidence that digital distraction is damaging our minds

#430

Post by thecrazyone »

DamnInteresting wrote: post #159
nakedrobot2 wrote: post #4

I am terrified about giving smartphones to my kids. France's new rule (no smartphones in schools - no exceptions) is genius, and I applaud them for that. What is a supercomputer in your pocket, with access to a significant portion of the sum total of human knowledge, good for, for most people? Playing fucking candy crush. We wish that we, humans, were better, but we are not. So what can we do about it? I have no idea…

> I am terrified about giving smartphones to my kids. Hey smartphone makers, if you're listening: Let me set an alternate PIN that unlocks the phone in a limited access mode, or "kid mode." Only pre-approved apps are available. Only pre-approved contacts can be called/texted. In-game purchases require the more secure PIN. Maybe when the phone is in this mode I can track its location easily, and make it emit a noise.…

Android has multiple users mode with a separate pin etc. Not sure about parental controls though
Post reply on HN