411–420 of 534 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Nothing is infinitely valuable.
10 engineers can make a billion dollar company. One Claude can replace 10 engineers. This gets very close to "infinitely valuable", it starts to look like a vertical line to me
Did Anthropic unlock a legal way to steal people's money and call it saving the world AND get away with it?
Just how much of that infinite money goes into Anthropic's PR department that they're able to pull this off and still be loved by users?
PRODUCT VIOLATION https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tr3t1uZNbKo DIRECTIVE 4: [Classified] Any attempt to arrest a senior officer of OCP results in shutdown. — Putting aside my snark, is Anthropic actually anticipating some new expansion of ITAR? (Or a stipulation for the Trump administration taking/not taking a share?) That is to say, do they expect to be told that they must have this mechanism, not just the terms?
Just so everyone is aware. Anthropic has been sabotaging AI researchers and their codebases and shadow-nerfing accounts for several years at this point. This isn't new, but they hadn't disclosed it until now. Likely because it is getting to the point where it's too noticeable, or they're concerned about it leaking from employees. Furthermore, the fact that they do these things, despite the incredible backlash... Just…
Bunch of suckers.
We just need to find a better way to train AI to develop deeper. Although, might not be easy.
has dario (or sam tbh) ever been thoroughly asked about the hypocrisy of them claiming distillation to be „theft“ vs. them training on the copyright of others? I’ve only seen him talk about one of those topics, but never together. I just can’t see how you can talk yourself out of that hypocrisy, if BS answers are properly followed up on (journalism!)
First it's "the model will say it can't do that". Now it's "the model will just misdirect you without telling you it's doing so". For now that's only for stuff that it thinks is developing a competing model (even if you trust it to accurately determine that), but who knows? It could be anything. Maybe it'll start silently nudging you away from certain sources of information. Maybe it'll give you inaccurate troubleshooting advice to induce you to pay for some kind of support contract from a corporate partner. Maybe it'll just subtly give out bad business advice to keep everyone else from succeeding in any way. It could be doing all that right now, for all we know. These models are a complete black box and there is no limit to the misinformation, disinformation, and malicious behavior that they could be engaging in already, let alone in the future.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't think this scenario makes sense. It's one of a class of scenarios I've seen several of, that simultaneously assume: A) ASI is developed and massively overshadows the rest of the world economy B) the world still has rule of law, contracts, business, well-developed finance, etc You can get to a lot of weird conclusions if you assume both A and B, but I think the much more likely scenario is that if A happens, B…
There will be a brief(or, depending on the underlying rules of reality ASI uncovers, not-so-brief) period where A and B do overlap - we have superintelligence but still have to run experiments, manufacture robots, test new drugs in vivo, etc. That period is in and of itself dangerous for the labs, because many entities can just stop them by denying necessary inputs. For the labs to conquer the world, they'll need coo…
I spend a lot of time telling Opus 4.8 to search for security bugs in the code it wrote, and it spends a lot of time finding them, and then fixing them. Fable wont let me fix the security issues that Opus 4.8 created.