Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes, they are listed on huggingface. The instruction trained models have an 'it' in their name. https://huggingface.co/collections/unsloth/gemma-4 Edit: Sorry, I'm not sure if this is a quant, but it says 'finetuned' from the Google Gemma 4 parent snapshot. It's the same size as the UD 8-bit quant though.
Only the 'it' models seem to have quants. I was really hoping to try a base model.
Google releases Gemma 4 open models
411–420 of 507 posts
Re: Google releases Gemma 4 open models
#412Earlier quoted context omitted.
Exactly, compare MoE with MoE and dense with dense otherwise it's apples and oranges.
Its coding to coding. I could care less how the model is architected, i only care how it performs in a real world scenario.
Just like smaller size models are speed / cost optimization, so is MoE.
G4 26B-A4B goes 150 t/s on 4090/5090, 80 t/s on M5 Max. Q3.5 35B-A3B is comparably fast. They are flash-lite/nano class models.
G4 31B despite small increase in total parameter count is over 5 times slower. Q3.5 27B is comparably slow. They are approximating flash/mini class models (I believe sizes of proprietary models in this class are closer to Q3.5 122B-A10B or Llama 4 Scout 109B-A17B).
Re: Google releases Gemma 4 open models
#413Re: Google releases Gemma 4 open models
#414Thinking / reasoning + multimodal + tool calling. We made some quants at https://huggingface.co/collections/unsloth/gemma-4 for folks to run them - they work really well! Guide for those interested: https://unsloth.ai/docs/models/gemma-4 Also note to use temperature = 1.0, top_p = 0.95, top_k = 64 and the EOS is " ". " thought\n" is also used for the thinking trace!
Re: Google releases Gemma 4 open models
#415Earlier quoted context omitted.
Do any of you use this as a replacement for Claude Code? For example, you might use it with openclaw. I have a 24 GB integrated RAM Mac Mini M4 I currently run Claude Code on, do you think I can replace it with OpenClaw and one of these models?
Did you try it?
Re: Google releases Gemma 4 open models
#416Earlier quoted context omitted.
*8 months That doesn't make parent's claim true or even relevant. And OpenAI could release an open model tomorrow. Nobody knows.
Anybody could release an open model tomorrow. Google is the only US based lab releasing open weights models. OpenAI released one once, which might or might not count as "releasing", depending on your definition
they've released gpt-oss-safeguard in October
I hope / think they are going to release more, just going for one big release a year like Gemma (if we talk strictly about general chat model -- Gemma 3 was March 2025)
Re: Google releases Gemma 4 open models
#417Gemma-4-E4B-it scored 15/25 on my https://sql-benchmark.nicklothian.com/#all-data (agentic SQL generation). The naming is a bit odd - E4B is "4.5B effective, 8B with embeddings", so despite the name it is probably best compared with the 8B/9B class models and is competitive with them. Qwen3.5-9B also scores 15/25 in thinking mode for example. The best 9B model I've found is Qwen3.5-9B-Claude-4.6-Opus-Reasoning-Distil…
Re: Google releases Gemma 4 open models
#418The elo ranking [1] is too good to be true. I don't know why gemma-4-26b-a4b performs better than gemma-4-31b.
Also waiting for more bugfixes in llama.cpp, sglang and vllm to do proper evaluations.
[1] https://arena.ai/leaderboard/text/expert?license=open-source