Live data from Hacker News

Retiring GPT-4o, GPT-4.1, GPT-4.1 mini, and OpenAI o4-mini in ChatGPT

openai.com

411–420 of 433 posts

Re: Retiring GPT-4o, GPT-4.1, GPT-4.1 mini, and OpenAI o4-mini in ChatGPT

#411
post #158

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Do you use it directly? I've only used it though Kagi Assistant but it works better than any other model for me

Yes, only directly (I mean through the default gemini interface, not API).

Maybe they messed something up in the official interface then. I've heard that the PDF processing capabilities are also significantly worse in Gemini UI compared to using it through the API or Google AI Studio.

Re: Retiring GPT-4o, GPT-4.1, GPT-4.1 mini, and OpenAI o4-mini in ChatGPT

#412
post #410
post #409

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Anorexia is overrepresented in both male and female models. To get that "ripped" look so many "fit" guys have, they often have to be dehydrated. Actresses wear full faces of makeup even in apocalyptic scenarios. It goes way beyond "just don't be fat".

It does, but the remedy they choose is not "women don't wear makeup," it's "we use fat women, and they wear more makeup than skinny women."

Including plus-size models doesn't fix the problem, but it's also not bad to have models show fat people "this is what our clothes could look like on your body". That's a logical choice under capitalism if you want fat people to buy your clothes.

Re: Retiring GPT-4o, GPT-4.1, GPT-4.1 mini, and OpenAI o4-mini in ChatGPT

#413
post #303

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Respectfully, this is a piss take. US prohibition on alcohol and to the large extent performative "war on drugs" showed what criminalization does (empowers, finances and radicalises the criminals). Portugal's decriminalisation, partial legalisation of weed in the Netherlands, legalisation in some American states and Canada prove legal businesses will better and safer provide the same services to the society, and the…

>Portugal's decriminalisation, (..) prove legal businesses will better and safer provide the same services to the society, and the lesser societal and health cost. Portugal's success regarding drugs wasn't about the free market. It was about treating addicts like victims or patients rather than criminals, it actually took a larger investment from the state and the benefits of that framework dissolved once budgets wer…

This is why I said "decriminalisation" and not "legalisation".

Re: Retiring GPT-4o, GPT-4.1, GPT-4.1 mini, and OpenAI o4-mini in ChatGPT

#414
post #303

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Respectfully, this is a piss take. US prohibition on alcohol and to the large extent performative "war on drugs" showed what criminalization does (empowers, finances and radicalises the criminals). Portugal's decriminalisation, partial legalisation of weed in the Netherlands, legalisation in some American states and Canada prove legal businesses will better and safer provide the same services to the society, and the…

>Portugal's decriminalisation, (..) prove legal businesses will better and safer provide the same services to the society, and the lesser societal and health cost. Portugal's success regarding drugs wasn't about the free market. It was about treating addicts like victims or patients rather than criminals, it actually took a larger investment from the state and the benefits of that framework dissolved once budgets wer…

Oh, I see how it could be understood as decriminalisation -> private companies selling drugs.

It wasn't my intention

Re: Retiring GPT-4o, GPT-4.1, GPT-4.1 mini, and OpenAI o4-mini in ChatGPT

#415

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why llm smut in particular? There's already a vast landscape of the interactive, VR games for all tastes. Why LLM is supposed to be worse?

I think the argument is that it’s interactive. You’re no longer just passively reading or watching content. You can join in on the role play. I’m not sure why that’s a bad thing though.

Same with games as compared to videos, especially VR.

Feels like someone angry at the machines capable of generating a tailored story.

Re: Retiring GPT-4o, GPT-4.1, GPT-4.1 mini, and OpenAI o4-mini in ChatGPT

#416
post #412
post #410

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It does, but the remedy they choose is not "women don't wear makeup," it's "we use fat women, and they wear more makeup than skinny women."

Including plus-size models doesn't fix the problem, but it's also not bad to have models show fat people "this is what our clothes could look like on your body". That's a logical choice under capitalism if you want fat people to buy your clothes.

There isn't a problem with what's shown on TV.

The problem is inside some people's heads, and diets.

I'm not talking about models for clothes, anyway.

Re: Retiring GPT-4o, GPT-4.1, GPT-4.1 mini, and OpenAI o4-mini in ChatGPT

#417
post #416
post #412

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Including plus-size models doesn't fix the problem, but it's also not bad to have models show fat people "this is what our clothes could look like on your body". That's a logical choice under capitalism if you want fat people to buy your clothes.

There isn't a problem with what's shown on TV. The problem is inside some people's heads, and diets. I'm not talking about models for clothes, anyway.

Right, you're talking about beauty standards in general, which we've already established go way beyond "just don't be fat".

Re: Retiring GPT-4o, GPT-4.1, GPT-4.1 mini, and OpenAI o4-mini in ChatGPT

#418

It’s interesting that many comments mention switching back to Claude. I’m on the opposite end, as I’ve been quite happy with ChatGPT recently. Anthropic clearly changed something after December last year. My Pro plan is barely usable now, even when using only Sonnet. I frequently hit the weekly limit, which never happened before. In contrast, ChatGPT has been very generous with usage on their plan. Another pattern I’…

I am using my claude pro plan for at least 8 hours a day, 5 days a week, to maintain a medium-sized codebase, and my total weekly usage is something like 25% of my limit. What the hell are people doing that burns through that token limit so fast?

Based on your other reply, seems like you're on Max5 plan ($100/m), not Pro ($20/m)

Re: Retiring GPT-4o, GPT-4.1, GPT-4.1 mini, and OpenAI o4-mini in ChatGPT

#419

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is incorrect. I have the $200 per year plan and use Opus 4.5 every day. Though granted it comes in ~4 hour blocks and it is quite easy to hit the limit if executing large tasks.

Not sure what you mean by incorrect since you already validated my point about the limits. I never had these issues even with Sonnet before, but after December, the change has been obvious to me. Also worth considering that mileage varies because we all use agents differently, and what counts as a large workload is subjective. I am simply sharing my experience from using both Claude and Codex daily. For all we know,…

This is not a weekly limit though, it is a 4 hour one. You still have not clearly defined what you are talking about.

Re: Retiring GPT-4o, GPT-4.1, GPT-4.1 mini, and OpenAI o4-mini in ChatGPT

#420
post #417
post #416

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There isn't a problem with what's shown on TV. The problem is inside some people's heads, and diets. I'm not talking about models for clothes, anyway.

Right, you're talking about beauty standards in general, which we've already established go way beyond "just don't be fat".

No, I'm talking about the beauty standards that get complained about, and that we see adjustments for.
Post reply on HN