Live data from Hacker News

Canadian bill would strip internet access from 'specified persons', no warrant

nationalpost.com

411–414 of 414 posts

Re: Canadian bill would strip internet access from 'specified persons', no warrant

#411
post #397

Earlier quoted context omitted.

We’re definitely in the pre-war era. It’s like when Britain was trying to negotiate with Hitler while rearming in the background. China is going to attack pearl harbour in the hopes that a sudden unexpected attack will cripple the pacific fleet and knock America out of the war. It won’t work, we’ll go through hell again. But every time these places think it will work, and they don’t factor in the fact that they are c…

>no choice but to escalate and invade Eastern Europe. They can barely hold on to Eastern Ukraine, them taking the entirety of Ukraine is not likely at all given that they have had to slog for many years just to take and hold one small part of the country. If they can’t even take all of Ukraine, I don’t think it’s very likely they try to attack any more of Europe.

Or one could look it the the other way around: the 50 countries, more or less, (Europe + US), that fight with the hands of Ukraine, as proxies, still haven't been able to defeat ONE Russia.

And despite of 23k of sanctions they've imposed on Russia, which is the absolute record by a looooooong margin on its own.

Re: Canadian bill would strip internet access from 'specified persons', no warrant

#412

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

The Canadian bill legally affects everyone in their country but the US actions are still largely illegal and will go away in a future administration, and they are localized to specific areas and groups.

Saying it will go away in a future administration is no different than saying this bill won't pass or will be removed by a future Canadian government. Sure it might, it might not, there is no way to tell at this juncture. To say that it is localized to specific areas and groups in the US is wrong, ICE has been deporting people all over the country without due process. While I am sure there are some areas of the US that are unaffected, I would hardly call that localized. Not to mention the attacks on the constitution by the Trump administration which affects everyone or any number of things that this administration has been doing that is illegal.

Re: Canadian bill would strip internet access from 'specified persons', no warrant

#413
post #43

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Are you willing to be the first stripped from the internet?

I have been banned from so many online forums/discussion boards for having a contrarian viewpoint that I’m practically stripped from the internet to begin with. Things like these will just force people to be passive consumers who can’t voice their opinions, so from my perspective nothing changes. Special thanks to dang for banning me about ~30 times and shadow banning me another 50. Doing the good Lord’s work.

If you can recreate accounts then it is not the same thing.

Re: Canadian bill would strip internet access from 'specified persons', no warrant

#414
post #408

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I will refine. All other arguments, directed at the source of the argument , that don't address the argument itself, are ad hominems.

Saying you didn't expect a good argument from a source due to reputation is not an ad hominem attack. Their expectation even had a reasonable explanation: their previous encounters with the source (as they saw them). Then their actual judgment was on the merits. And even their credibility expectations were based on actual experience (as they interpreted those) with the target, not something irrelevant to credibility.…

When someone prejudged a claim based on who made it, that’s an ad hominem.

Kudos that OP actually read it, but that doesn’t change “I thought the argument was weak because of who made it”

Post reply on HN