Live data from Hacker News

ChatGPT Pulse

openai.com

411–420 of 766 posts

Re: ChatGPT Pulse

#411
post #82

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Objectively. I’m now tackling tasks I wouldn’t have even considered two or three years ago, but the biggest breakthrough has been overcoming procrastination. When AI handles over 50% of the work, there’s a 90% chance I’ll finish the entire task faster than it would normally take me just to get started on something new.

What tasks is it doing 50% of the work on for you?

Just off the top of my head (and I exclusively use Claude Code now):

Random Postgres stuff:

- Showed a couple of Geo/PostGIS queries that were taking up more CPU according to our metrics, asked it to make it faster, it rewrote it in away that it actually used the index. (using the operator for example for proximity). One-shotted. Whole effort was about 5 mins.

- Regularly asking for maintenance scripts (like give me a script that shows me the most fragmented tables, or highest storage, etc).

CSS:

Built a whole horizontal logo marquee with CSS animations, I didn't write a single line, then I asked for little things like "have the people's avatars gently pulsate" – all this was done in about 15 mins. I would've normally spent 8-16 hours on all that pixel pushing.

Elixir App:

- I asked it to look at my GitHub actions file and make it go faster. In about 2-3 iterations, it cut my build time from 6 minutes to 2 minutes. The effort was about an hour (most of it spent waiting for builds, or fiddling with some weird syntax errors or just combining a couple extra steps, but I didn't have to spend a second doing all the research, its suggestions were spot on)

- In our repo (900 files) we had created an umbrella app (a certain kind of elixir app). I wanted to make it a non-umbrella. This one did require more work and me pushing it, but I've been putting off this task for 3 YEARS since it just didn't feel like a priority to spend 2-3 days on. I got it done in about 2 hours.

- Built a whole discussion board in about 6 hours.

- There are probably 3-6 tickets per week where I just say "implement FND-234", and it one-shots a bugfix, or implementation, especially if it's a well defined smaller ticket. For example, make this list sortable. (it knows to reuse my sortablejs hook and look at how we implemented it elsewhere).

- With the Appsignal MCP, I've had it summarize the top 5 errors in production, and write a bug fix for one I picked (I only did this once, the MCP is new). That one was one-shotted.

- Rust library (It's just an elixir binding to a rust library, the actual rust is like 20 lines, so not at all complex)... I've never coded a day of rust in my life, but all my cargo updates and occasional syntax/API deprecations, I have claude do my upgrades and fixes. I still don't know how to write any Rust.

NextJS App:

- I haven't fixed a single typescript error in probably 5 months now, I can't be bothered, CC gets it right about 99% of the time.

- Pasted in a Figma file and asked it to implement. This rarely is one-shotted. But it's still about 10x faster than me developing it manually.

The best combination is if you have a robust component library and well documented patterns. Then stuff goes even faster.

All on the $100 plan in which I've hit the limit only twice in two months. I think if they raised the price to $500, it would still feel like a no-brainer.

I think Anthropic knows this. My guess is that they're going to get us hooked on the productivity gains, and we will happily pay 5x more if they raised the prices, since the gains are that big.

Re: ChatGPT Pulse

#412
post #236

Earlier quoted context omitted.

We know that relying heavily on Google Maps makes you less able to navigate without Google Maps. I don't think there's research on this yet, but I would be stunned if the same process isn't at play here.

Whatever your mind believes it doesn’t need to hold on to that what is expensive to maintain and run, it’ll let go of. This isn’t entirely accurate from a neuroscience perspective but it’s kinda ballpark. Pretty much like muscles decay when we stop using them.

> Whatever your mind believes it doesn’t need to hold on to that what is expensive to maintain and run, it’ll let go of. This isn’t entirely accurate from a neuroscience perspective but it’s kinda ballpark.

A similar phenomena occurs when people see or hear information and whether they record it in writing or not. The act of writing the percepts, in and of itself, assists in short-term to long-term memory transference.

Re: ChatGPT Pulse

#413

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I have been coding on and off (more off than on) for 47 years. I kinda stopped paying attention when we got past jquery and was never a fan of prototypical inheritance. Never built anything with tailwind, Next.js, etc. After spending some time writing copy, user stories and a design brief (all iterative with ChatGPT) cursor one shot my (simple) web app and I was live (once I'd spent a couple hours documenting my requ…

How do you deal with security for web stuff? I wouldn't host anything vibe-coded publicly because I'm not enough of an expert in web/frontend to even double-check that it's not generating some giant holes.

The same way you do security for manually written code. Rigorously. But in this case, you can also have AI also do your code reviews and suggest/write unit tests. Or write out a spec and refine it. Or point it to OWASP and say, look at this codebase and make a plan to check for these OWASP top 10.

And have another AI review your unit tests and code. It's pretty amazing how much nuance they pick up. And just rinse and repeat until the AI can't find anything anymore (or you notice it going in circles with suggestions)

Re: ChatGPT Pulse

#414

My pulse today is just a mediocre rehash of prior conversations I’ve had on the platform. I tried to ask GPT-5 pro the other day to just pick an ambitious project it wanted to work on, and I’d carry out whatever physical world tasks it needed me to, and all it did was just come up with project plans which were rehashes of my prior projects framed as its own. I’m rapidly losing interest in all of these tools. It feels…

Maybe the next hype train won't rely on GPU's.

Re: ChatGPT Pulse

#415
post #366

My pulse today is just a mediocre rehash of prior conversations I’ve had on the platform. I tried to ask GPT-5 pro the other day to just pick an ambitious project it wanted to work on, and I’d carry out whatever physical world tasks it needed me to, and all it did was just come up with project plans which were rehashes of my prior projects framed as its own. I’m rapidly losing interest in all of these tools. It feels…

Try turning off memory. I've done a lot of experiments and find ChatGPT is objectively better and more useful in most ways with no memory at all. While that may seem counter-intuitive, it makes sense the more you think about it: (1) Memory is primarily designed to be addictive. It feels "magical" when it references things it knows about you. But that doesn't make it useful. (2) Memory massively clogs the context wind…

Totally agree on the memory feature. You just have to look at the crap it tries to remember to see how useless it is and the kind of nonsense it will jam into the context.

“Cruffle is trying to make bath bombs using baking soda and citric acid and hasn’t decided what colorant to use” could be a memory. Yeah well I figured out what colorant to use… you wanna bet if it changed that memory? Nope! How would it even know? And how useful is that to keep in the first place? My memory was full of useless crap like that.

There is no way to edit the memories, decide when to add them to the context, etc. and adding controls for all of that is a level of micromanaging I do not want to do!

Seriously. I’ve yet to see any memory feature that is worth a single damn. Context management is absolutely crucial and letting random algorithms inject useless noise is going to degrade your experience.

About the only useful stuff for it to truly remember is basic facts like relationships (wife name is blah, kid is blah we live in blah blah). Things that make sense for it to know so you can mention things like “Mrs Duffle” and it knows instantly that is my wife and some bit about her background.

Re: ChatGPT Pulse

#416

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I don't think it's helped me do anything I couldn't do I am seeing a pattern here. It appears that AI isn't for everyone. Not everyone's personality may be a good fit for using AI. Just like not everybody is a good candidate for being a software dev, or police officer etc. I used to think that it is a tool. Like a car is. Everybody would want one. But that appears not be the case. For me, I used AI every day as a t…

What home tasks do you use it for? It's hard for me to imagine many. It's not doing the dishes or watering the plants. If I wanted to rearrange the room I could have it mock up some images, I guess...

Figuring out which fertilizer, how often to water and sun placement for the plants is a useful AI request.

Re: ChatGPT Pulse

#417
post #5

Just connect everything folks, we'll proactively read everything, all the time, and you'll be a 10x human, trust us friends, just connect everything...

And specially important to connect your personal data to a company which most likely murdered a whistle-blower: https://youtu.be/RkKp8GkfpX4

That’s what I’m saying! I’m not trusting Sam Altman with ANY of my data. He makes Zuckerberg look like a sane, reasonable guy in comparison.

Re: ChatGPT Pulse

#418
post #5

Just connect everything folks, we'll proactively read everything, all the time, and you'll be a 10x human, trust us friends, just connect everything...

When smartphones came I first said "I don't buy the camera and microphone that spy on me from my own money." Now you would be really a weirdo to not have one since enough people gave in for small convenience to make it basically mandatory.

You’re conflating the phone and camera with the actual data collection. So that’s not a good argument

Re: ChatGPT Pulse

#419
post #238

LLMs are increasingly part of intimate conversations. That proximity lets them learn how to manipulate minds. We must stop treating humans as uniquely mysterious. An unfettered market for attention and persuasion will encourage people to willingly harm their own mental lives. Think social medias are bad now? Children exposed to personalized LLMs will grow up inside many tiny, tailored realities. In a decade we may me…

It doesn't have to be that way of course. You could envision an LLM whose "paperclip" is coaching you to become a great "xyz". Record every minute of your day, including your conversations. Feed it to the LLM. It gives feedback on what you did wrong, refuses to be your social outlet, and demands you demonstrate learning in the next day before it rewards with more attention. Basically, a fanatically devoted life coach…

I’m highly doubtful that that aligns with the goals of OpenAI. It’s a great idea. Maybe Anthropic will make it. Or maybe Google. But it just seems like the exact opposite of what OpenAI’s goals are.

Re: ChatGPT Pulse

#420

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not who you asked, but I upgraded NextJS in a couple of repos by just telling Claude Code to do it. I've had it swap out and upgrade libraries successfully in one shot too. It will usually create good enough Page Objects for E2Es and scaffold out the test file, which speeds up the development process a bit. Same for upgrading Node versions in some Lambda projects, just tell it to go and come back later. Instruct it t…

> Personally, I think it really shines at doing the boring maintenance and tech debt work. It shines at doing the boring maintenance and tech debt work for web . My experiences with it, as a firmware dev, have been the diametric opposite of yours. The only model I've had any luck with as an agent is Sonnet 4 in reasoning mode. At an absolutely glacial pace, it will sometimes write some almost-correct unit tests. This…

For sure. There's tons of training data in the models for the JS and TS language and the specific tasks I outlined, but not specifically just the web, I have several Node or Bun + Typescript + SQLite CLI utilities that it also helps with. I definitely pick my battles and lean in to what it works best for though. Anything it appears to struggle at I'll just do manually and develop it like we always did. It's rarely not a net positive to me but it's very frequently a negligible improvement. Anything that doesn't pay off in spades I typically don't try again until new models release or new tools or approaches are available.
Post reply on HN