Live data from Hacker News

iPhone Air

apple.com

411–420 of 1001 posts

Re: iPhone Air

#411
They really know how to get your consumer juices flowing

Aside from Macs for development I've never been an iPhone person but I'm seeing this like ooh. But no I'm good with my $160 motorolla android phone, no shade against this phone, good enough for my needs.

I do wish Android phones had lidar

Re: iPhone Air

#412

By purchasing a new iPhone you are directly contributing to the humanitarian crisis in the Congo. A thin phone won’t change your life but it might be responsible for a life being lost.

It uses 100% recycled cobalt.

https://www.apple.com/environment/pdf/products/iphone/iPhone...

Re: iPhone Air

#413

I don't feel like I need a thin phone. I need a smartphone which can last for a week after a single charge. From what I understand, the energy density in modern battery processes is enough to pack 100 Wh battery into a phone, but for some reason we are stuck with 20 Wh for years.

You wouldn't want that weight. Well, 99.5% of smartphone users wouldn't want that weight. Maybe you would.

I can withstand +250g.

Re: iPhone Air

#414

I'd be paranoid all the time about breaking it by accidentally sitting on it. Thinner just means it won't have as much strength to resist being bent into an ass-shaped curve, right?

That’s what Apple care is for.

Best part of using Apple products by far

Re: iPhone Air

#415

So there's one feature the Air is missing according to a deep dive of the Compare sheet ( https://www.apple.com/iphone/compare/ ): The Air does not support mmWave cellular connectivity, while the other models (and previous models going back awhile) do support it. That is...weird? Why would the Air's design prevent that?

The mmWave functionality requires a glass section on the frame as it can't pass through metals. They've redesigned this on the 17 Pro[1], but likely didn't find a way to integrate into the Air's design.

  When Camera Control was introduced on iPhone 16, Apple moved the 5G mmWave antenna to pass through the back glass of the iPhone, that way it was no longer something you needed to see.

  Now though, with iPhone 17 Pro – that can’t work. The iPhone is now largely made of aluminum, requiring Apple to revert to an old design technique: a glass cutout for 5G mmWave passthrough
1. https://9to5mac.com/2025/09/09/iphone-17-pro-mmwave-glass-cu...

Re: iPhone Air

#416
post #187

Can someone that is actually interested in this explain the appeal? Thin on its own I get but thin with a giant bump 100% defeats the whole point for me. Seems clear at this point there is little hope of them engineering their way into thin cameras.

iPhone status symbol without having to haul around a huge bulky phone. Most users probably use/need 10% of what a max pro iPhone offers, but they want 100% of the max pro status. Now they can keep the status without needing to carry a chonker.

Is there, in your experience, a group of people that consider a phone a substantial status symbol?

(Edit: Should have refreshed I see. Feel free to ignore.)

Re: iPhone Air

#417
post #187

Can someone that is actually interested in this explain the appeal? Thin on its own I get but thin with a giant bump 100% defeats the whole point for me. Seems clear at this point there is little hope of them engineering their way into thin cameras.

iPhone status symbol without having to haul around a huge bulky phone. Most users probably use/need 10% of what a max pro iPhone offers, but they want 100% of the max pro status. Now they can keep the status without needing to carry a chonker.

No one could tell the difference between the Max Pro and the cheaper Plus model in the previous years or even the SE.

The reason for the Max Pro is the larger screen and better battery life

Re: iPhone Air

#418

I have Samsung S25 Edge which is essentially same thickness (5.8mm) the biggest difference is weight, phone feels really light compared to my old phone. The most annoying thing on the phone is wobbling when it is on flat surface thanks to lenses sticking out. Battery life is alright. I can get 2-3 days of life from it with light use. If I am using it a little bit more, then it is barely one day of battery life. And c…

Yep, weight matters a lot more.

For this they could engineer a good plastic but it wouldn't sell because it wouldn't feel "premium" enough. So instead, we get nonsense like that. And it suits them well because the thing is that much more likely to break so they get more chances to have the customer pay for repair or phone change.

Win-Win for them, lose-lose for the customer, basically everything Apple is about currently.

Re: iPhone Air

#419
> iPhone Air features N1, a new Apple-designed wireless networking chip that enables Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 6, and Thread.

Congrats to Apple for finally designing out Broadcom and vertically integrating the wireless chip

Re: iPhone Air

#420
post #225

It has A19 Pro. A19 Pro has matmul acceleration in its GPU, the equivalent of Nvidia's Tensor cores. This would make future Macs extremely viable for local LLMs. Currently, Macs have high memory bandwidth and high VRAM capacity but low prompt processing speeds. Give it a large context and it'll take forever before the first token is generated. If the M5 generation gets this GPU upgrade, which I don't see why not, the…

IMO it's underwhelming considering folding phones have been out for many years now and we still don't have a folding iPhone. What are the PMs doing at Apple.

Aside from the obvious mechanical issues, the screen quality compromises, et cetera, folding phones are just dorky. Apple wants their products to be anything but dorky.

There will never be a folding iPhone, simple as.

Post reply on HN