Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
If the price of free speech is that racists have free speech, then I'm willing to pay it.
14 Killed in anti-government protests in Nepal
411–420 of 504 posts
Re: 14 Killed in anti-government protests in Nepal
#412Re: 14 Killed in anti-government protests in Nepal
#413Earlier quoted context omitted.
I mean, what what do you do to protect the parliamentarians from blood thirsty crowds. Which side were you on during the January 6 riots/protests?
Of course the answer is that people cheer for protests they like and punish riots they don’t. This is politics and that’s why there is so much fighting about how news and history chooses to frame them. The headline we have received today is telling me it’s a good protest.
Re: 14 Killed in anti-government protests in Nepal
#414Earlier quoted context omitted.
Quite similar corruption is happening here in America! Donald trump made over $3.8B since getting into office this year, while tanking farming, jobs market, and foreign relations.
Unlike those that came before him of course, who are just regular folk like us making ends meet.
Re: 14 Killed in anti-government protests in Nepal
#415Earlier quoted context omitted.
Corruption is endemic in many places, but somehow the chance of regime change is more correlated with unwillingness to follow the USA dictate than with corruption ....
> somehow the chance of regime change is more correlated with unwillingness to follow the USA dictate than with corruption What did Nepal fail to do for America that supposedly caused this?
Pakistan/Bangladesh is another manner. The way Imran Khan was ousted...
Re: 14 Killed in anti-government protests in Nepal
#416Earlier quoted context omitted.
How could "buy and hold my crypto pump and dump or Ill cut aid/hike tariffs to your country" not be corruption?
People who voted for him are still trying to work out in their own heads how he's not a criminal.
Re: 14 Killed in anti-government protests in Nepal
#417Earlier quoted context omitted.
Also note the phrasing. The content is "the police killed 14 people". But the form is "the situation turned violent as a result of the protester's actions".
"See what you made me do" is a common phrase in domestic abuse.
https://www.oregonlive.com/portland/2025/09/wipe-them-out-tr...
Re: 14 Killed in anti-government protests in Nepal
#418Earlier quoted context omitted.
Classic color revolution — China and India will be watching intently.
Classic removal of agency from real revolutions to avoid thinking critically about the real problems a country has, and instead blame a foreign boogeyman. A favorite tactic of authoritarian regimes and the tankies that love them.
On the other hand, if a foreign country really wanted to destabilize you, can they do anything better than to exploit real grievances of the local population?
Re: 14 Killed in anti-government protests in Nepal
#419Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think its quite something that we all waste our time over divisions like left/right, capitalism/socialism, woke/not-woke when in practice; this is the only division that matters. Those who are trying to follow the rules and make the nation better, and those that are only active for their self-interest.
That's probably a healthy way to see things. Ideally all people that are actively working to create or improve should be on the same "side" against those that are destructive. The second order conflict then becomes what the rules are, and how we guide that side. That is, I think, where most of the factionalism historically plays out. It does feel like we're regressing to fighting that first order conflict more often…
I think that's partly true. e.g. pro life vs pro choice I can see both sides pushing for what they think is right.
Some people though do bad things, knowing those things are bad. But they do it anyways because it benefits them. So maybe it's not seeing themselves as being "destructive" per se, but at least not caring about the negative consequences to others.
Re: 14 Killed in anti-government protests in Nepal
#420Earlier quoted context omitted.
First, Maldives. Then, Bangladesh, Now, Nepal. An unstable Nepal allows the destabilization of two critical states in India. Regime change in India is the big prize. -- China and India do meddle. But a classic color revolution, such as this one, is the signature of you-know-who.
Nepal has always been somewhat of a basket case. Remember when their prince went nuts and shot the royal family up? Then the whole country went through the wringer in the mid-00s. Shame, it’s one place I really want to visit, but it seems like it will be a bit of a challenge (well, at least not Iran-level challenge, which is another place I want to visit someday and has different but even bigger problems).