Live data from Hacker News

How Ukraine’s killer drones are beating Russian jamming

spectrum.ieee.org

411–420 of 454 posts

Re: How Ukraine’s killer drones are beating Russian jamming

#411

Drone warfare has always been equal parts distressing (it’s impersonal, it’s too easy to leverage, and therefore too easy to abuse) and incredible (ultra-thin fiber as a kite line? Brilliant!) to me. These advances are no different. That said, I do fret we’re staring down a new age of guerrilla warfare. Drones are cheap, widely available, and increasingly autonomous. Their countermeasures are either impractical for c…

I think watch out for Mexico. The cartels are swimming in cash and are already using drones to attack security forces and assassinate people.

Yeah, it’s much cheaper for China and Mexico to destroy the US from the inside with a slow poison of drugs over decades than any done attack.

Re: How Ukraine’s killer drones are beating Russian jamming

#412
post #246

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I mean if war has existed since the dawn of man. Maybe we are trying to fix the problem incorrectly.

War has (probably) existed since before the dawn of man. Even chimpanzees engage in something like tribal warfare so that behavior probably goes back to a common ancestor species at least 6M years ago.

Chimpanzees haven’t even invented x86 yet though, so they clearly have no chance to stop from fighting.

Re: How Ukraine’s killer drones are beating Russian jamming

#413

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Andrew Tridgell, from rsync/samba to drone ....

What goes on in a person's mind when they pivot to making killing machines?

I would rather the enemy die than myself and my family.

Re: How Ukraine’s killer drones are beating Russian jamming

#414

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>Civilian 737 boarding airfield where Russia keeps strategic nuclear bombings? I'm not sure if the Tu-95 is hosted at any joint-use airports, but joint-use themselves airports are not uncommon. Pskov is joint-use, Ukraine launched a smaller-scale attack on some Il-76s there a couple years back. The scenario that an attack on legitimate target aircraft could be happening metres away from civilian aircraft is realistic…

It's not a problem when Russia, Israel, USA, or other nations attacks civilians, because of a military reason. Why it will be a problem in this case?

There has never been a way where civilians are not attacked.

Re: How Ukraine’s killer drones are beating Russian jamming

#415
post #74

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's strange - blocking GPS is typical around military sites. So, assume the drones were hard-coded to zero a location - they couldn't do it, as GPS would be blocked. They had to be piloted. Interesting.

Inertial navigation is a thing though. Your smart phone has a very capable accelerometer for a short flight.

Error propagation makes inertial navigation only useful over short distances.

Re: How Ukraine’s killer drones are beating Russian jamming

#416

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sun Tzu says it better: "A military operation involves deception." He could be telling the truth, he could be lying... A drone programmed to automatically boot up , check its location, and if it's at the right coordinates, take off and crash at some other coordinates (the airfield) is more satisfying to "fans" of automated warfare. For extra fun, add some other code to "look for plane-like objects to crash into", but…

Only need one camera drone capable of identifying targets. And just tells another drone to bomb it.

“Don’t attack this plane that already has a hole in it”

The startup attempting this would need Actual Indians for the first few special ops attempts before getting the true AI experience.

Re: How Ukraine’s killer drones are beating Russian jamming

#417

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"He said that each of the 117 drones launched had its own pilot." https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c1ld7ppre9vo

How could they be navigated from such a long distance? Satellite communication? Wouldn't the lag be too high?

Yes, Ukrainian military leadership has admitted that Starlink has been so vital that they would have had no chance without it. Starlink latency can be faster than cable in some parts of the us. Remember light travels faster in air than through metal wire as radio.

Re: How Ukraine’s killer drones are beating Russian jamming

#418

If your country is an adversary of China, I would be scared. I've seen videos on YouTube of how the drones from Chinese drone light shows take off and return to their launch areas. They have remarkable accuracy.

Drones will be fine for defending territory that you already control.

China has no intention of attacking a distant country besides taking control of Taiwan in 2027.

Re: How Ukraine’s killer drones are beating Russian jamming

#419
post #205

Earlier quoted context omitted.

None of them caused any casualities or any damage to infrastructure. As we have multi layered defense system with L70 and Zu23 for very short range Defense agains drones and UAV, Spyder for Short Range, Akash for Medium range, s400 for Long range and high value target, exact kill rate of Guns are unknown. In press briefing, officials said that these were so effective against drones.

That's very impressive, especially at low cost.

https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/defence/in-operati...

Re: How Ukraine’s killer drones are beating Russian jamming

#420
post #333

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The "unique" part is two-fold. 1. It's cheap. 2. It's anonymous. The fact that we haven't had more drone terror attacks says more about the technological slowness of terrorists than its infeasibility. And eventually terrorists catch up. (Probably after the Russia-Ukraine war ends and some skilled people from both sides are unemployed) It's infeasible to blanket every inch of civilian space with kinetic or EW anti-dro…

> The fact that we haven't had more drone terror attacks says more about the technological slowness of terrorists than its infeasibility. Also motivation and incentives. The reason we haven't seen many drone attacks on civilians is that it is far more lucrative to get civilians to buy your product than to kill them, and the companies that actually have the resources to mount a credible drone attack are making a lot m…

3000 people died on 9/11 alone. Spreading it over 50 years, makes it 60/year. Where did you get the 4 from?
Post reply on HN