Yeah, they posted this: > Hey, we're Adobe! We're here to connect with the artists, designers, and storytellers who bring ideas to life. What's fueling your creativity right now? > Drop a reply, tag a creator, or share your latest work—we'd love to see what inspires you! That's such a bland, corporate message. It feels totally inauthentic. Do Adobe (a corporation) really "love to see what inspires you" or do they jus…
They want engagement for their new account, it's what anyone who posts on social media wants.
Adobe deletes Bluesky posts after backlash
411–420 of 784 posts
Re: Adobe deletes Bluesky posts after backlash
#412Earlier quoted context omitted.
It’s so bland I don’t understand why it elicited any response at all.
The general mood on Bluesky is very opposed to AI, especially AI art. Since Adobe now has AI integrated into their products, people on Bluesky hate them.
Re: Adobe deletes Bluesky posts after backlash
#413Earlier quoted context omitted.
The collection of the training data is the “scooping up” I mentioned. I assume you acknowledge the training data doesn’t spontaneously burst out of the aether? As for the model, it’s still creating deterministic, derivative works based off its inputs and the only thing that makes it random is the seed so it being a database of vectors is irrelevant.
deterministic is neither here nor there for copyright infringement. a hash of an image is not infringing, and a slightly noisy version of it is.
Re: Adobe deletes Bluesky posts after backlash
#414Earlier quoted context omitted.
There are a lot of good photoshop alternatives. Most are better at individual use cases than photoshop. For example, nearly all the alternatives are better at designing website comps because they are object-based instead of layer-based.
There are "some" Photoshop wannabes. I still haven't found any program on Linux that can give me anywhere close to the same ease of use and powerful tools that Photoshop has. The example you provided sounds like you want to use Illustrator for your use case anyway.
Re: Adobe deletes Bluesky posts after backlash
#415Charging a subscription fee is crazy for a product that is very expensive. I do not know why they are still around.
People don't want to use Gimp, which is the next most powerful photo editing software :-)
Re: Adobe deletes Bluesky posts after backlash
#416Adobe runs what must be one of the largest deceptive rebills. The vast majority of users signing up for a monthly plan do not realize that it is actually an "annual plan, billed monthly" and thus that if they cancel after one month (for example) they'll be billed for the remaining 11 immediately. I honestly don't know how they haven't faced FTC action for this, as it's been their primary model for 5-10 years now.
Almost every single one of Adbobe post on HN has a top comment about this evil subscription plan. I fell for it once. But I’m in India so I just cancelled my debit card and that was that. Good luck to them to chase me through legal means in India. It was still bit of a hassle though.
Now it’s much easier to deal with the subscription problems due to the new RBI norms.
Re: Adobe deletes Bluesky posts after backlash
#417Adobe is the one major company trying to be ethical with its AI training data and no one seems to even care. The AI features in Photoshop are the best around in my experience and come in handy constantly for all sorts of touchup work. Anyway I don't really think they deserve a lot of the hate they get, but I do hope this encourages development of viable alternatives to their products. Photoshop is still pretty much p…
https://www.adobe.com/fireflyapproach/
(I work for Adobe)
Re: Adobe deletes Bluesky posts after backlash
#418Earlier quoted context omitted.
I would describe my business relationship with Adobe as: "hostage" They annually harass me with licensing checks and questionnaires because they really hate you if you run Photoshop inside a VM (my daily driver is Linux), although it is explicitly allowed. Luckily, I don't need the Adobe software that often. But they hold a lot of important old company documents hostage in their proprietary file formats. So I can't c…
> proprietary file formats Gimp can't handle them?
Re: Adobe deletes Bluesky posts after backlash
#419Yeah, they posted this: > Hey, we're Adobe! We're here to connect with the artists, designers, and storytellers who bring ideas to life. What's fueling your creativity right now? > Drop a reply, tag a creator, or share your latest work—we'd love to see what inspires you! That's such a bland, corporate message. It feels totally inauthentic. Do Adobe (a corporation) really "love to see what inspires you" or do they jus…
They want engagement for their new account, it's what anyone who posts on social media wants.