Live data from Hacker News

Ghostty 1.0

ghostty.org

411–420 of 719 posts

Re: Ghostty 1.0

#411
post #26

I have found the following community site for generating Ghostty config quite helpful https://ghostty.zerebos.com/

Hey this is my tool, thanks for sharing! I've been very happy with how well received it has been so far!

Well, thanks! Sometimes GUI makes for easier discovery than a wall of text, even when the docs are good.

Re: Ghostty 1.0

#412
post #35
post #34

[flagged]

How many platforms are required? I noticed it doesn't have an OS/2 download.

How is that relevant here? You should have named Android [0] because that is only platform that has more users than Windows.

[0] But that one is still Linux.

Re: Ghostty 1.0

#413

Ghostty got a lot of hype (I cover this in my reflection below), but I want to make sure I call out that there is a good group of EXCELLENT terminals out there, and I'm not claiming Ghostty is strictly better than any of them. Ghostty has different design goals and tradeoffs and if it's right for you great, but if not, you have so many good choices. Shout out to Kitty, WezTerm, Foot in particular. iTerm2 gets some ha…

Thank you for making this. Does it support quake mode? It's hard to tell looking at the docs.

From https://ghostty.org/docs/features:

> macOS

> Quick Terminal: Lightweight terminal that animates down below the menu bar for instant access without interrupting work.

Re: Ghostty 1.0

#414

As someone who uses the default terminal app, I'm curious to learn about other people's use-cases where the choice of terminal app makes a difference and how.

I am not sure how to answer this. Why choose a non-default anything? It feels like deeper down, you’re asking why anyone chooses anything. These terminal emulators all behave slightly differently and have different strengths and weaknesses. Some are configurable. Some are programmable. Some feel “right”. Others can be made to feel “right”. Etc. Why use any non-default application? Same answer for terminal emulators.

This is a very specific question.

Re: Ghostty 1.0

#415
post #64

After a quick test this looks incredibly good and fast. I'll use it as a terminal for the next weeks to see how it goes, but I have good feelings. Thank you so much for writing it. EDIT: WOOOW, for me this is going to be a game changer. I was just working at Redis stuff outputting a ton of debugging info and results, and normally the terminal was the bottleneck, and here instead it printed half million of results in…

why don't you just pipe it into a file and then less it? if your redis stuff prints so much stuff you might want to reevaluate the respective program logic.

Re: Ghostty 1.0

#416
Have set it up with Nushell. It’s pretty fast while displaying really long log files. Going to sit alongside iTerm2 until I get comfortable with it.

The only things I miss are (1) right click to copy paste selection (akin to Putty), and (2) profiles (I work with different shells depending on my projects and use Profiles frequently on iTerm2)

Re: Ghostty 1.0

#417
post #203

I might give this a shot but using GTK4 makes me think this won’t live up to the “native” claim on Linux. It will likely feel out of place on non-GTK DEs with KDE being the big one. And yes, I did read the about page disclaimer about Linux but strongly disagree about calling GTK4 the closest thing. That’s a very GNOME-centric view (e.g., ignores the rest of the Linux ecosystem) and makes me worry that any issues on o…

Gnome is becoming the de-facto Linux DE. It's standard on Ubuntu, Fedora, RHEL, Suse and Debian. KDE is standard on what, Steam deck? Every enterprise-y distro ditched it some time ago...

KDE is standard in my house

Re: Ghostty 1.0

#418

Ghostty got a lot of hype (I cover this in my reflection below), but I want to make sure I call out that there is a good group of EXCELLENT terminals out there, and I'm not claiming Ghostty is strictly better than any of them. Ghostty has different design goals and tradeoffs and if it's right for you great, but if not, you have so many good choices. Shout out to Kitty, WezTerm, Foot in particular. iTerm2 gets some ha…

what was the motivation to start this project? it got so many points here, hence I assume there must be something really useful about it - but I so far fail to see it.

Re: Ghostty 1.0

#419
post #368

You can downvote this but Why they never put a single screen shots !

The whole home page is a screenshot and two buttons.

But not showing any of the native interface elements that are supposed to set this terminal emulator apart.

Re: Ghostty 1.0

#420
post #265

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Mitchell has a 5 min lightning talk discussing performance of ghostty which is worth a quick watch https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cPaGkEesw20&t=3015s It's one of those things that you don't realize how poor the performance is until you experience something better. Mentioned from his blog: https://mitchellh.com/writing/ghostty-is-coming

> It's one of those things that you don't realize how poor the performance is until you experience something better. No, it’s one of those things I’ve tested myself extensively and arrived at my own conclusion. Which I already mentioned in the comment you responded to.

The performance talk is about ghostty, which you did not mention trying. You mention alacritty, which is GPU based and offers good performance, but you're quick to rebuttal on unrelated projects.
Post reply on HN