Am I alone in thinking the word “agentic” is dumb as shit? Most of these things seem to just be a system prompt and a tool that get invoked as part of a pipeline. They’re hardly “agents”. They’re modules.
It's easier for consultants and sales people to sell to enterprise if the terminology is familiar but mysterious. Bad 1. installed Antivirus software 2. added screen-size CSS rules 3. copied 'Assets' harddrive to DropBox 4. edited homepage to include Bitcoin wallet address link 5. upgraded to ChatGPT Pro "Good" 1. Cyber-security defenses 2. Responsive Design implementation 3. Cloud Storage 4. Blockchain Technology ga…
Gemini 2.0: our new AI model for the agentic era
411–420 of 512 posts
Re: Gemini 2.0: our new AI model for the agentic era
#412What's everyone's favorite LLM leaderboard? Gemini 2 seems to be edging out 4o on chatbot arena( https://lmarena.ai/?leaderboard )
Notably, GPT-4o is a "full size" model, whereas Gemini 2 Flash is the small and efficient variant in that family as far as I understand it.
Re: Gemini 2.0: our new AI model for the agentic era
#413Re: Gemini 2.0: our new AI model for the agentic era
#414https://aistudio.google.com/live is by far the coolest thing here. You can just go there and share your screen or camera and have a running live voice conversation with Gemini about anything you're looking at. As much as you want, for free. I just tried having it teach me how to use Blender. It seems like it could actually be super helpful for beginners, as it has decent knowledge of the toolbars and keyboard shortcu…
Not quite up to excited junior-level programmer standards yet. But maybe good for other things who knows.
Re: Gemini 2.0: our new AI model for the agentic era
#415Re: Gemini 2.0: our new AI model for the agentic era
#416It's funny how even the latest AI models struggle with simple questions. "What's the first name of Freddy LaStrange"? >> "I do not have enough information about that person to help with your request. I am a large language model, and I am able to communicate and generate human-like text in response to a wide range of prompts and questions, but my knowledge about this person is limited. Is there anything else I can do…
https://chatgpt.com/share/675ab91c-c158-8004-9dfc-ea176ba387...
A better way to say it is: "funny how Google can't keep up with the reasoning effectiveness of OpenAI's latest models"
Re: Gemini 2.0: our new AI model for the agentic era
#417https://aistudio.google.com/live is by far the coolest thing here. You can just go there and share your screen or camera and have a running live voice conversation with Gemini about anything you're looking at. As much as you want, for free. I just tried having it teach me how to use Blender. It seems like it could actually be super helpful for beginners, as it has decent knowledge of the toolbars and keyboard shortcu…
Re: Gemini 2.0: our new AI model for the agentic era
#418Re: Gemini 2.0: our new AI model for the agentic era
#419https://aistudio.google.com/live is by far the coolest thing here. You can just go there and share your screen or camera and have a running live voice conversation with Gemini about anything you're looking at. As much as you want, for free. I just tried having it teach me how to use Blender. It seems like it could actually be super helpful for beginners, as it has decent knowledge of the toolbars and keyboard shortcu…
Oh who am I kidding, people upload literally everything to drive lmao.
Re: Gemini 2.0: our new AI model for the agentic era
#420Gemini 2.0 Flash is available here: https://aistudio.google.com/prompts/new_chat Based on initial interactions, it's extremely verbose. It seems to be focused on explaining its reasoning, but even after just a few interactions I have seen some surprising hallucinations. For example, to assess current understanding of AI, I mentioned "Why hasn't Anthropic released Claude 3.5 Opus yet?" Gemini responded with text that…
That's fine, but it couldn't spot it, then it told me that I had put that syntax in the instructions and quoted me - but that wasn't true. It repeatedly said it had undone that and rewrote the code with it still in as well.
It added some async stuff where it wasn't needed (no way for it to know to be fair), what was interesting was when told this it apologised and explained it had just been doing so much async work recently it got confused.
Another interesting quote
> I am incredibly sorry for the repeated errors. I have made so many mistakes, and I am very frustrated with myself. I believe this is now correct, and adheres to the instructions.