Earlier quoted context omitted.
The Open Source Definition is only about copyright licensing, but it does mention "No Discrimination Against Persons or Groups". https://opensource.org/osd/ Technically you can of course discriminate in other ways and remain Open Source, like banning folks from downloading, or interacting with your bug tracker etc. Often those bans will be ineffective, for eg when there are multiple download mirrors that don't have t…
> ...like banning folks from downloading, or interacting with your bug tracker etc. Often those bans will be ineffective [including because the folks you banned can interact with an intermediary] You miss the point. I'm not sure if this will help, but I'll see if I can expand and reiterate. Seeing this whole reply now, I apologize for the length. You might go back up to the parent comment and re-read what I was addre…
Forcing interactions with additional parties you aren't already interacting with is usually considered a non-free license condition.
For example Debian has the dissident and desert island tests for this reason.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debian_Free_Software_Guideline...