Live data from Hacker News

First impressions: Yes, Apple Vision Pro works and yes, it’s good

techcrunch.com

411–420 of 562 posts

Re: First impressions: Yes, Apple Vision Pro works and yes, it’s good

#411
The words that comes to mind when I see the pictures of a person wearing that in a room with another person: Prank. Carnival. Grotesque. Dystopian. My prediction is this device is joining the hall of fame of technological misdirection's along with such products like the NES Power Glove.

Re: First impressions: Yes, Apple Vision Pro works and yes, it’s good

#412
post #335

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>At some point the signals going to your brain won't be too different Tell me you've never had sex. Sex and VR porn no matter how realistic are words apart.

At some point your brain will be able to be tricked enough for you not to care about the difference.

That won't be vr tech. That's more neuralink/mind-machine interface sort of thing.

Re: First impressions: Yes, Apple Vision Pro works and yes, it’s good

#413
post #211

I don't understand why there is no AR or VR killer app for this thing. Their sales pitch was "it makes it amazing to read articles in safari"? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GYkq9Rgoj8E&t=5410s $3500 to... look at a floating web browser? Surely they can come up with something. Give me UV/IR vision, let me see the pipes under the ground, show me how to assemble the furniture I'm looking at, give me a template to pain…

The first iPhone was pretty crappy. No apps. 2G only. Poor battery life. Limited global distribution - not even Canada could get it. But it captivated people who didn’t own it yet, and it proved out some essential ideas like multitouch. And when the iPhone 3G came out, improving on some of the original device’s shortcomings, it was wildly popular. The rest is history. There is no doubt that AR will eventually get goo…

> No apps. 2G only. Poor battery life.

This particular song has gotten pretty familiar.

No Wireless. Less space than a Nomad. Lame.

Re: First impressions: Yes, Apple Vision Pro works and yes, it’s good

#414
post #211

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The first iPhone was pretty crappy. No apps. 2G only. Poor battery life. Limited global distribution - not even Canada could get it. But it captivated people who didn’t own it yet, and it proved out some essential ideas like multitouch. And when the iPhone 3G came out, improving on some of the original device’s shortcomings, it was wildly popular. The rest is history. There is no doubt that AR will eventually get goo…

Lmao, but the first iPhone was a major improvement over other phones at the time and offered a form of consistence/stability versus the often very experimental models other companies had. The difference here is of course that VR/AR has been thriving already. Apple is late to the game as they are most of the time, but the reactions I have seen so far in YT/Twit comments are the amazed reactions of the tech illiterate…

> No virtual objects, no 3d anything

Presumably this will be a thing since they support on the iPhone and tries making a pretty big deal from by showing virtual legos and other stuff in a keynote a year or two ago.

The ARKit seems to have been designed for this thing since it wasn’t ever a very good experience on the iPhone.

https://developer.apple.com/augmented-reality/

Re: First impressions: Yes, Apple Vision Pro works and yes, it’s good

#415
post #211

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The first iPhone was pretty crappy. No apps. 2G only. Poor battery life. Limited global distribution - not even Canada could get it. But it captivated people who didn’t own it yet, and it proved out some essential ideas like multitouch. And when the iPhone 3G came out, improving on some of the original device’s shortcomings, it was wildly popular. The rest is history. There is no doubt that AR will eventually get goo…

As people below have pointed out, arguable it was crappy. Sure, lacked 3G, lacked apps, but the utter ease of connecting to wifi and flicking through Safari… …anyways, arguable. What’s inarguable is that the iPhone 4, which came along only 3 years later, was a damned miracle. Beautiful design, Retina screen, something approaching a “real” camera—just remarkable progress in that time. I’m unsure if Apple is going to b…

The iPhone 4 came out a year after https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTC_HD2 and kind of felt meh with it’s tiny screen.

I didn’t really get what the fuss was about until the iPhone 6 (aside from software and arguably Android had caught up by then)

Re: First impressions: Yes, Apple Vision Pro works and yes, it’s good

#416

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think 'killer app' is missing the point. Looking for a killer app you are looking at this to be a traditional VR or even AR device, that is not what this is. This is about having a screen anywhere, multiple screens and turning anything into a screen and any environment into one, hence the name Vision Pro, that is how Apple are trying to sell it. If you watched the keynote I think that was clear, everyone else seems…

I don’t think it’s about having a screen everywhere though: I would be uncomfortable going out in public with it, for fear of being mugged for it.

This happened early in the life of the iPad. Insurance companies wouldn’t include it in personal articles since there was high theft rate. That subsided over time due to ubiquity and software security.

Re: First impressions: Yes, Apple Vision Pro works and yes, it’s good

#417
post #211

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The first iPhone was pretty crappy. No apps. 2G only. Poor battery life. Limited global distribution - not even Canada could get it. But it captivated people who didn’t own it yet, and it proved out some essential ideas like multitouch. And when the iPhone 3G came out, improving on some of the original device’s shortcomings, it was wildly popular. The rest is history. There is no doubt that AR will eventually get goo…

The first iPhone was an iPod that could make phone calls; that was all it needed to be (for the people who were already carrying a phone and an iPod).

A large multitouch display was a pretty big deal. I watched movies on my iPod classic but it wasn’t a very nice experience and the scroll wheel is not exactly the most flexible input method..

Re: First impressions: Yes, Apple Vision Pro works and yes, it’s good

#418
post #211

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The first iPhone was pretty crappy. No apps. 2G only. Poor battery life. Limited global distribution - not even Canada could get it. But it captivated people who didn’t own it yet, and it proved out some essential ideas like multitouch. And when the iPhone 3G came out, improving on some of the original device’s shortcomings, it was wildly popular. The rest is history. There is no doubt that AR will eventually get goo…

The first iphone was the first time most people could actually use the internet on something they could carry around, even if it was just with wifi. It did everything phones did but much better since it was all touch. Interfaces to alarms, the calculator, the camera etc was entirely different. Anyone who used it knew that everyone else would either copy it or go out of business.

Windows Mobile and Symbian devices were a thing for years and had functioning browsers. The iPhone was an improvement (as long as you had wifi) but it took a couple of years before it actually become widespread

Re: First impressions: Yes, Apple Vision Pro works and yes, it’s good

#419
post #44

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Quest 2? You re some kind of world champion, most people get tired

Tired of what? I don't understand. I have a very comfortable third-party head strap (BOBOVR M2) and cooling facial interface so I don't really notice that I'm even wearing a headset after a few minutes.

it s heavy but also the eyes get tired. but of course people in their 20s dont get it :)

Re: First impressions: Yes, Apple Vision Pro works and yes, it’s good

#420

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I didn’t get one until the 3G came out, but I have a very clear memory of the “wow!” feeling: right after buying the phone, I went down the street to a coffee shop and started browsing the web while waiting in line. I was instantly cured of my prior skepticism that it could actually be a major improvement over my flip phone + iPod.

Also GPS maps with that shiny glass dot. You bought a phone, and you got a GPS navigator for free. I had a friend who had just bought a high end Nokia. We arranged to meet for lunch. She got hopelessly lost because Nokia's GPS and mapping were crap. Apple's just worked. Same with the App Store. I'd guess this is going to have some kind of VApp Store. But I suspect what it really needs is plain old MacOS running every…

It’s worth remembering the original iPhone did not have GPS at all. It had google maps for calling up information like you would with map quest, but no turn by turn/live navigation
Post reply on HN