Earlier quoted context omitted.
I tried to get such a kitchen scale and couldn't find one that wasn't either highly imprecise or ridiculously expensive (like three digit euros) If you have a vintage one that is reasonably exact, they're great.
You cooking meth there or something? It's a kitchen scale, I doubt you'd need that much of precision from it.
Everything with a battery should have an off switch
411–420 of 613 posts
Re: Everything with a battery should have an off switch
#412Earlier quoted context omitted.
IMO it's a misuse of the technology. Controlled remote access was a good idea for doctors to see how therapy was working and adjust when necessary. I'd argue that newer APAP machines are so good at self-adjusting that it's less clear that remote access is necessary. And using it for insurance purposes should never have been permitted to begin with. Price it into the premium and skip the dystopian monitoring part. Per…
I agree APAP is so good you no longer need a Dr. involved. People should be allowed to purchase an APAP machine if they want it, with no prescription. However I disagree about insurance - they are paying for it, so they can chose how they want to monitor usage. If you don't like it, then pay for it yourself, exactly like you did. Also, the older machines don't have remote access, they have a little card you have to b…
Enough to matter? Let's put this in context. A typical CPAP machine will go for years before needing to be replaced, and can be purchased retail for about $800. Compared to routine medical expenses, that's nothing. Heck, the reduction in costs for monitoring compliance would probably lead to -lower- premiums, not higher.
Re: Everything with a battery should have an off switch
#413>> (Our design team will never listen. This is because they, one, don't listen to anyone ever; and two, never use the products they design. Oh, sure, there might be a user study or two. But they never actually have to live with or work with the damn things.) This is so obvious from everyday life that someone really ought to write a paper about it and have it published in Nature. Because it will certainly be published…
I get that you're pissed, but there's plenty of technology that you seemingly forget about (being pissed off makes you a bit irrational) that works most of the time. Saying nothing ever fucking works is just a dumb take
I'm two months (at least) without data on my phone. I didn't need to use it and I'm a lazy ass so I didn't try to fix it. When I call them, a kind youg man on the other end of the chat says he's reset my service and within a couple of hours I'll definitely have data.
In a couple of hours I have no data, but now I also have no service: "emergency calls only". Result!
Of course I can't log into my account to see what's up, because it's trying to send me a TFA code. It can't send it to my mobile, since it's dead, but it sends it to my landline which is in the UK. I'm in Greece now.
I try to get help by clicking on a link in the page where I fail to login. I'm taken to a page with an "AI assistant" called TOBi. The page has the assistant's icon, smiling at me encouragingly and a wheel that's spinning, spinning, spinning... and spinning.
I think I pass out from all the spinning and all the screaming and pulling at my pigtails. I finally realise I can actuall call a number to ask for help. Fortunately my friend still has service.
I have to blow a few raspberries down the line to convince the (other) chatbot that it can't understand my speech, but I'm finally connected to a human being.
The kind young woman on the other end of the line tells me she has reset my service and I will definitely have my service back in 24 to 48 hours.
Three days later I definitely don't have service. I try to log in to my university email to pick up some work I need to do, but it asks me for a TFA code. That it sends to my mobile.
I call Vodafone for a third time. This time, I'm put through to a technician. He asks me to take my sim out of my phone and read the S/N off it "to make sure it's the right sim".
Hang on. To do what?
I put the sim back in the phone and I have service. Ah. So that's what he wanted me to do. He could have said so.
And I should have thought of it.
So, nothing works. Not even my goddamn brain works anymore. If that was a dumb take, that's because I'm dumb and useless and so is everyone else, it seems. Except for the guy who doesn't know how to tell you "did you try taking it out and putting it back in again?".
Because that's the only thing that works anymore.
Re: Everything with a battery should have an off switch
#414Earlier quoted context omitted.
Rechargeable AAAs are crap though. Power density sucks. Voltage level sucks (and voltage regulators will suck the battery dry before your micro does). And the form factor sucks. I'd sooner have a 18650-family (e.g. 14240 or 14500) become standard than a bunch of AAAs.
Battery hipsterism. Oh HN, you keep giving.
Getting a bunch of consumers used to buying spare Li-ion cells and using external chargers might be a non-starter, but it's possible to have both onboard charging and removable cells so the upgrade path is there for those who want it.
Re: Everything with a battery should have an off switch
#415Earlier quoted context omitted.
> With 5G and future connectivity, it feels as there will be push towards not being able to block the network access of individual devices, such that a TV or fridge will just speak to its server directly via some XG/IoT network which the user does control, without any user ability to block this communication How does one ensure that a product is built this way, to avoid it? I understood that a number of current 5G ca…
True. My car came with ATT sim installed. It uses that to remote start via App, and to tell me the location, miles, other data in app. Also, to show me directions on its display screen. There is no way for a user to switch off that data connection (not that I want it, its free of cost, and it helped me few times).
Re: Everything with a battery should have an off switch
#416I would say there are a few reasonable exceptions to the rule. For example I wouldn’t want smoke detectors or carbon monoxide detectors to have off switches.
Of course there are always exceptions. Smoke detectors usually have replaceable batteries though, which kind of work like an off switch. Pacemakers however should definitely not have an off switch, and a replaceable battery would be tricky. You'd have to do the switch like that BMO character.
That is changing. Several states, including California and New York, no longer allow replaceable battery smoke alarms. They require long life sealed batteries. Other states are in the midst of doing so.
They are doing this because smoke detectors have a limited lifetime. You are supposed to replace them 10 years after manufacture. However, they don't suddenly stop working at 10 years...they just get less and less effective over time.
Many people don't realize they are supposed to replace them, or know it but forget. I didn't know, for instance, until mine was ~17 years old. It still went off when I'd sear a steak if I forgot to close the door between the kitchen and the room it was in so there was no obvious thing to tell me that it was likely losing effectiveness.
By going to units with a sealed battery meant to last the lifetime of the unit they hope to make it more likely that people will remember to replace them. When it is time the units will beep like the replaceable battery units do when the battery is getting low.
I would guess there are also people with the replaceable battery units who when it starts signaling low battery take out the battery planning to pick up a new one next time they are shopping, forget, and take a long time to remember if ever. Sealed units will help there, too.
BTW, when buying smoke alarms it is probably best to avoid Kidde (also avoid them for fire extinguishers). They are prominently featured at Home Depot and Walmart, and can be a little hard to avoid if you don't take a bit of care. Here's why to avoid them, from the Wirecutter.com article on basic smoke detectors:
> With placement on the shelves of Home Depot, Kidde is the most prominent competitor to First Alert, but its overall track record is, in a word, disturbing. In 2018, the company recalled more than 450,000 dual-sensor smoke alarms; in 2016, it recalled 3.6 million smoke/CO alarms, and in 2014, it recalled 1.2 million smoke/CO alarms. In addition, since 2005, Kidde has enacted three separate fire extinguisher recalls of 470,000 units (2005), 4.6 million units (2015), and 40 million units (2017). Worst of all, in early 2021, a federal judge ordered Kidde to pay a $12 million civil penalty “in connection with allegations that the company failed to timely inform the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) about problems with fire extinguishers manufactured by the company.” For these reasons, we can’t, in good conscience, recommend any Kidde products to our readers.
> Although First Alert is not immune to recalls (it recalled nearly 150,000 smoke alarms in 2006 and roughly 600,000 fire extinguishers in 2000), none of them are recent or on the scale of what Kidde has had to do.
Re: Everything with a battery should have an off switch
#417Earlier quoted context omitted.
That book, IMNSHO, should be required reading for anyone that designs anything to be used by anyone.
Last week, I bought ten copies of the book for everyone in our team — regardless of role.
Re: Everything with a battery should have an off switch
#418Earlier quoted context omitted.
This used to be how I assumed that awful UX keeps coming about, repeating the same mistakes and then making new ones by removing existing conveniences for no clear reason. But surely, I thought, I must be assuming the worst of an assuredly more rational situation. I then heard more about the designers at Microsoft for Vista through Windows 11 which deeply confirmed most of my prior negative assumptions. It sometimes…
Does anyone remember Office 2013 with the UPPER CASE MENUS? They were bad enough, but then Visual Studio 2013 HAD THEM TOO. That was triply bad: ugly, took more screen width than Mixed Case, and perhaps worst of all, to a programmer they looked like errors. Most of the languages we work with are case sensitive, so FILE and File look like two different things. It was a constant irritant. The chief designer for VS2013…
Re: Everything with a battery should have an off switch
#419Earlier quoted context omitted.
And coated windows. Sounds like the way forward. Does a smart fridge still work if you rip the modem and Wlan boards out?
Having worked in a former alphabet agency building that did have a faraday cage built into it, don’t worry too much about the windows. They weren’t a big enough hole to allow connections even in the middle of the city. Even standing at one with your cell phone was iffy.
Re: Everything with a battery should have an off switch
#420Earlier quoted context omitted.
Jesus Christ that's dystopian.
Not really. The device belongs to the insurance company and they're only willing to pay for it if it's actually being used. They are quite expensive machines, and they don't want people having them in their house, and not actually using them (CPAP has a very low patient compliance rate). And that's why they have tracking built-in. You're perfectly able to buy the machine yourself without insurance and then you don't…
You can buy your CPAP outright for around ~$1500. This is a problem for many people, but probably not HN readers. The telemetry basically facilitates an interest-free loan that lets you pay for the machine over a couple years. More favorable financing than a credit card, so people aren't getting super screwed here.