Earlier quoted context omitted.
My viewing is pretty broad, I’ve seen these movies except Magnolia. What you are describing is the placing of a movie in a cultural context. This is criticism, not learning on an individual level. For example, take Mulan. I can generate a feminist counter-critique that the new Mulan is in fact better because women are born with special qualities men don’t have, and often are superior when given equal opportunities. T…
I think we were doing well until you brought in some pap like Mulan.
Modern movies teach us awful lessons [video]
411–414 of 414 posts
Re: Modern movies teach us awful lessons [video]
#412Earlier quoted context omitted.
The types of ear plugs for music are high-fidelity and barely distort the sounds you actually want to hear, like dialogue.
Can you recommend a product?
Re: Modern movies teach us awful lessons [video]
#413Art has to bespeak truth to be worthy of the name. Postmodernism scuttles truth, prepending a grade of 'F' to the word 'art'.
Re: Modern movies teach us awful lessons [video]
#414Earlier quoted context omitted.
Right, though I think I'd maybe use the term "values" rather than "virtues." The underlying message of these movies is that everyone---women included---should be judged by masculine standards (plus a traditional notion of female beauty). But a pseudo-feminism that imagines a world where women succeed only through a combination of feats of strength and hotness is not feminism in any meaningful sense and serves to main…
> change the stories to put feminine values on par with masculine values That's important too - and male characters should have those values - but no reason we can't do both. Stop trying to put women in whatever box you like. They can have whatever values/virtues/etc that they please. Women serve regularly in militaries around the world, for example, and have for awhile. What do say to women who are fighter pilots?
Sure---but how society responds to a woman's choice is a collective act that she has little control over. Nothing in my comment suggested putting women in a box, exactly the opposite. It's a spectrum, where not all men adopt masculine values and not all women adopt feminine ones. There are women who relate more to what are thought of as masculine values, like fighter pilots, and it's great that society is increasingly accepting of them. But just saying women can join the men's club is not real social change. Real social change is respecting values that are not typically associated with men. Values revolving around love and human relationships, for instance, rather than violence and mechanics.
Ask yourself why the military came to mind as an exemplary set of values for the modern woman. I'd suggest that it is because you regard military service as a desirable epitome of masculinity, and if women can achieve that same peak, then they can be regarded as equals in society. But to your own point about choice, even if no women choose to join the military, we should have female heroes who are regarded on par with any male war hero.