Live data from Hacker News

Microsoft buys Nuance for nearly $20B

axios.com

411–418 of 418 posts

Re: Microsoft buys Nuance for nearly $20B

#411
post #47

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Buy the stock and enjoy the ride.

So you've seen the move "The Circle"? Complete transparency for everyone then?

Personally I think that given current policies an "Umbrella Corp" that does everything is unavoidable. The question is, will I be able to profit through it?

Re: Microsoft buys Nuance for nearly $20B

#412

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I work in healthcare software and recently did a spike building a voice assistant for the EMR. We compared Google, AWS, Azure and Nuance's voice and intent recognition and Nuance blew all the others out of the water. When it comes to understanding medical terminology Nuance is way ahead of anything other providers have. Dragon has been around for 23 years and has been THE product for VR in the medical field for at le…

Dragon's actually been around since 1982 (39 years). Sad story about the founders, Janet and Jim Baker, though. https://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/15/business/goldman-sachs-an...

Very sad story. Two pioneers of voice tech had literally nothing for their hard work.

Re: Microsoft buys Nuance for nearly $20B

#413

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There is only one English "conversational" voice that I see ( which seems to be the best). Is there a way to make the others "conversational" if not, is Zoe the best example? Did you find any competing product that came close? Thank you

I’m referring to the speech to text product. What’s the Zoe thing?

Oh its one of the TTS voices

Re: Microsoft buys Nuance for nearly $20B

#414

Earlier quoted context omitted.

At the time, there were only 3 comments on HN I could find. One of them was certainly questioning the decision: [1] But wmf was right on the money [2]: "Maybe Apple thinks they can outdo the Cortex". [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=171511 [2] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=171879

I'm amused to see 'wmf commenting today about M1 ;)

Who is wmf?

Re: Microsoft buys Nuance for nearly $20B

#416
post #402
post #400

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Facebook's acquisition of Instagram? Google's acquisition of YouTube? Android? DoubleClick? Amazon's acquisition of Twitch? I could go on. These examples are not comparable to what the OP was saying, e.g AOL/Time-Warner, Compaq/HP are mergers of giants with lot of employees.

Ok fine. Here ya go: BoA/Merrill Lynch Shell/Royal Dutch Sanofi/Avantis Glaxo/SmithKline P&G/Gillette Roche/Genetech Exxon/Mobil Conoco/Philips Disney/Fox AT&T has had so many successful mergers that the government has basically had to split them up every time because it made them into a monopoly. Should I go on? EDIT: PS - DoubelClick in 2007 was considered "BIG". It had 1200 employees and was bought for $3.1B. Whic…

Those are good examples, you should have included them in the first post.

Re: Microsoft buys Nuance for nearly $20B

#417

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't know, I wouldn't welcome it either that's for sure. But the github acquisition went pretty OK so far. I don't think it will be disastrous. I'm referring to the various overtures between MS and Canonical lately, a lot of collaboration going on. https://pulse.microsoft.com/en/transform-en/na/fa2-canonical... I don't think it would be the end of desktop Linux but it would mean a focus away from the core principl…

Considering those collaborations with Microsoft, I've seen some reports of Microsoft wanting to change Windows so it's based on the Linux Kernel. Seems like a long shot but...

The kernel is not the problem with Windows. Arguably the NT kernel is better in design and cleaner in implementation than Linux.

The issue with Windows is 30+ years of legacy cruft and APIs that are all bundled in, mostly in user-space. Needed for backward compatibility which how Microsoft won and keeps the “enterprise” market.

Re: Microsoft buys Nuance for nearly $20B

#418

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I remember people being flabbergasted by the price they paid for PA Semi. Dividing the price by the number of engineers seemed indeed ludicrous. And yet, here we are.

At the time, there were only 3 comments on HN I could find. One of them was certainly questioning the decision: [1] But wmf was right on the money [2]: "Maybe Apple thinks they can outdo the Cortex". [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=171511 [2] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=171879

Good find. I was a lot more focused on PPC back then. After Apple switched to Intel, I didn’t really see the reason for PA Semi’s acquisition.

The iPhone’s magic was all about the software to me.

Post reply on HN