Live data from Hacker News

Tesla Roadster

tesla.com

411–420 of 729 posts

Re: Tesla Roadster

#411

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In electric cars, isn't it basically the same?

Even if there is not a traditional transmission, there is still a gearbox behind the electric motor. Tires only rotate at ~1000 RPM on the freeway where the electric motor in a Tesla might be at 10k rpm. That 10x reduction still needs to be factored in.

Honest question: did you just make up these numbers, or are they based in fact? I was expecting the motor to turn slower.

Re: Tesla Roadster

#412
post #377
post #234

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I was just about to write my own comment about this: the battery capacity is the real eye-opener in this announcement, I think. The new roadster looks like a car which is rather smaller than the Model 3, certainly not larger. And as a sporty car it wouldn't be heavier either. So how in all worlds do they fit a 200kWh battery in there? This can only mean, it has more than twice the capacity per weight and volume than…

You're discounting the fact that this will be released in 2020. We've had a 4x increase in density between 2010-2016. Also, Model 3 benefits from the new smaller gigafactory-made battery packages (at least a 35% increase in density over older Model S battery packs). When you take all of this into account, it's very likely that they could fit an older Model S-size battery pack (which is more from 2015-2016 era) in a R…

Oh, I don't doubt, that Tesla can do it :). I just think it is interesting that the specs to the roadster point to a clear and significant increase in battery density. The Model S went from 80 to 100 kWh in 5 years, which is a nice increase but much smaller what they seem to plan with the roadster. And it would be exciting for electrical cars in general, because with that increase a more realistic 100 kWh battery changes from being something you can barely fit into a rather large Model S to something which should fit easily in much smaller cars designed for electric propulsion.

Re: Tesla Roadster

#413
post #366

Earlier quoted context omitted.

From Wikipedia's F1 page [0]: > The 2016 F1 cars have a power-to-weight ratio of 1,400 hp/t (1.05 kW/kg). Theoretically this would allow the car to reach 100 km/h (62 mph) in less than 1 second. However the massive power cannot be converted to motion at low speeds due to traction loss and the usual figure is 2.5 seconds to reach 100 km/h (62 mph) Even adjusting for 60 mph = 2.4s, I don't see how the traction of the T…

Per your links, the minimum permissible weight of an F1 car is 731kg including the driver, but not fuel. For FE it is 800kg. The 2011 Tesla Roadster weighed 1235kg, sans driver. The 2011 Bugatti Veyron 1834kg. The very long range also suggests that this car will weigh considerably more than the old Roadster. Maybe there is an improvement to traction with all that extra weight? Or maybe the weight just helps with keep…

Actually the opposite. You get less traction with more weight due to "load sensitivity" of viscoelastic materials (= rubber).

Re: Tesla Roadster

#415
post #17

The Tesla roadster specs are insane! No exotic carmaker will be able to match it (taking price as a consideration). (no Ferrari, or Lambo, can get that close. This is Formula 1 acceleration speeds). Plus 620 miles of range, and it is a 4 seater. Expensive as hell, but this is exotic car territory. Base Specs Acceleration 0-60 mph1.9 sec Acceleration 0-100 mph4.2 sec Acceleration 1/4 mile8.8 sec Top SpeedOver 250 mph…

I doubt these high-end manufacturers will let this unanswered until 2020.

Re: Tesla Roadster

#416
post #17

The Tesla roadster specs are insane! No exotic carmaker will be able to match it (taking price as a consideration). (no Ferrari, or Lambo, can get that close. This is Formula 1 acceleration speeds). Plus 620 miles of range, and it is a 4 seater. Expensive as hell, but this is exotic car territory. Base Specs Acceleration 0-60 mph1.9 sec Acceleration 0-100 mph4.2 sec Acceleration 1/4 mile8.8 sec Top SpeedOver 250 mph…

Ah, but do the doors go like this ^(o_o)^ or like this \(o_o)/ not like this

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Re: Tesla Roadster

#417

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I wonder at what speed you get that range. Those specs are in Bugatti Veyron league, even beating it at acceleration (for 1/8 the price tag), but at full speed, the Veyron empties its full tank in... 12 minutes. I'll let you calculate how many miles that is at 250mph.

Also I wonder how many times you can accelerate like that... maybe only once with full charge?

The Porsche CEO has been sorta claiming that but it doesn't make sense to me. The kinetic energy of your car at a given speed is the same, regardless of how fast you accelerated to get to that speed. Do batteries waste more energy when you drain them faster?

They can't waste a large portion of battery capacity, because the heat from that much energy getting wasted would blow up the car.

Re: Tesla Roadster

#418
It'll be interesting to see if they can keep the battery power output up for a sustained length of time. Acceleration numbers are all well and good, but racetrack performance is about sustained high-load operation, and Tesla has had some trouble there:

http://www.thedrive.com/news/5207/this-video-reminds-us-that...

https://insideevs.com/expected-tesla-model-s-fails-lap-nurbu...

Then again, how many people actually care? I don't think they'll have trouble finding buyers.

Re: Tesla Roadster

#419
I don't see autopilot or any sort of autonomy mentioned for the new Roadster. That sort of makes sense, but I'm also a bit disappointed about it.

Re: Tesla Roadster

#420
post #328

All nice and good. We see the EV revolution in front of our eyes. But nobody speaks about the EV infrastructure.

At least for the roadster, it doesnt seem to matter that much. The people who will buy this will do it for the flashy logo and the ridiculous (And dangerous) speed of course.

True.

But the revolution is simply the battery. They claim ~1000km on one charge.

This is impressive and might do something about the missing infratructure.

Post reply on HN