Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Grok Build is open source

github.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

401–410 of 730 posts

Re: Grok Build is open source

#401

Post by timmmmmmay »

jdiff wrote: post #385
tengbretson wrote: post #380

Earlier quoted context omitted.

3090s are still selling at damn near their release MSRP.

They're not filling datacenters with 3090s. With the amount of headache and the amount of infrastructure needed to support those beasts, do they even have a resale price at all? Or just scrap value?

you know you can just log onto eBay and see what the price of a used H100 is. nobody is stopping you

Re: Grok Build is open source

#403

Post by vladmk »

DustinBrett wrote: post #335
halfmatthalfcat wrote: post #277

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So just like Trump. Birds of a feather.

[flagged]

Not true - I don’t hate him in fact I have a fucking poster of the guy lol I just read a few of his books and look at the facts - you’re not just a “regular guy” at that level he says so himself in the Walter Isaacson biography. Being compared to Michael Jordan isn’t an insult - but it’s not a big compliment either - the gift is also a curse.

Re: Grok Build is open source

#404

Post by msy »

sohrob wrote: post #274

[flagged]

A lot of companies are still using Cursor but I don't know of anyone moving to it, and I do know of many moving from it to Codex or Claude, feels like a legacy product at this point alongside windsurf & the replit/lovable/bolt cluster.

Re: Grok Build is open source

#405

Post by xp84 »

shigawire wrote: post #364
justinhj wrote: post #333

Earlier quoted context omitted.

it's worse really. at least there are subreddits relatively free of trump bad elon bad non stop nonsense

Trump seems objectively bad at his job by a number of metrics. So it seems reasonable that would be the consensus in most forums.

Trump is objectively terrible, corrupt, and feeble-minded, but the lack of self-awareness on the other side is darker. For your platform to be so bad, so out of touch, that you lose to that? And the DNC takeaway was "No, we were perfect - it's the voters who are wrong."[1] I'd rather have one terrible president than support a party that doesn't even believe democracy should exist when it disagrees with them.

[1] https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/am-i-so-out-of-touch

Re: Grok Build is open source

#406

Post by cgh »

mexicocitinluez wrote: post #270
Telemakhos wrote: post #242

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Musk bought Twitter looking to build an “everything app,” the western WeChat. AI came along and promised an end to apps via an agentic OS that does what its user wants and vibes whatever it needs to accomplish that as it goes along. The agentic OS is basically the same thing as the “everything app,” and I doubt Musk will let go of that.

> Musk bought Twitter looking to build an “everything app,” Part of me thinks he knows he lying and is just trying to drum up money and the other part thinks he's one of the most delusional and uninformed people in tech.

He’s a fast-talking dingbat.

Re: Grok Build is open source

#407

Post by justinkramp »

tomhow wrote: post #5
justinkramp wrote: post #3

[flagged]

Please don't just post the most obvious snarky comment about a given topic. The guidelines make it clear we're trying for something better here. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

Good push, thank you. Others have commented more salient criticism.

Re: Grok Build is open source

#409

Post by xp84 »

brokencode wrote: post #352
jimmygrapes wrote: post #303

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What happened to the rule about steelmanning? I know it's chic to post super hot takes about what we assume a persons intentions are, and I know there are plenty of "if you can't see how bad they are you're the problem" type justifications; I know the supposed goal of empathy is tossed aside at first hint of disagreement whether real or perceived, and I know there is "evidence" of justification for hatred/dismissal.…

What rule about steelmanning? We’re commenting online, not writing peer reviewed research. And yeah, some people lose the benefit of the doubt. Sorry, but actions have consequences. Elon doesn’t just get to kill hundreds of thousands of poor people by eliminating USAID and expect everyone to treat him the same way. He’s made enemies for life, and he deserves it.

Wait, you think not giving additional aid = responsibility for whatever happens in the developing country? Does this blame go for the rest of the year, decade, or century?

Does giving aid in the first place automatically trigger this? If I gave $500 to kids cancer research every year for 5 years, and then I don't give this year, do I have blood on my hands every time a kid dies of cancer from now on? And if you didn't ever donate, you don't?

How does this work?

Post reply on HN