Live data from Hacker News

Anonymous GitHub account mass-dropping undisclosed 0-days

github.com

401–407 of 407 posts

Re: Anonymous GitHub account mass-dropping undisclosed 0-days

#401

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Codec vulnerabilities in the browser have been a recurring source of exploits, as have similar vulnerabilities in phone messenger apps. The phone ones are particularly bad because phones typically preprocess received media files (for thumbnailing etc) so a vulnerability here can sometimes be chained into a remotely triggered near-instant compromise. I don’t know if there is data on exploits due to downloaded media bu…

If said videos or media are doing that, there would be a corpus of samples by now. I'm very sceptical of this.

Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence, but I concede that attacks via locally downloaded video may not be a widespread problem at the moment. The problem is we just don’t know. I doubt these attacks would be effective against government or corporate targets (not sure who is torrenting on their work computer) and that’s where most post-exploit forensic data is gathered.

Re: Anonymous GitHub account mass-dropping undisclosed 0-days

#402

I recently used a pretty well-tuned LLM to find ~500 safety bugs across the Rust ecosystem. Most of them are minor, and even major safety issues in Rust usually mean "it's possible to accidentally use this API in a way that is broken" not "this is directly exploitable", but I didn't want to just file LLM output as issues on these repos. I very briefly considered doing something like this: if I just post the results o…

Can you at least provide some links to examples of the issues you’re filing? I’ve seen so many claims of people who used LLMs to generate hundreds of issues that turned out to be full of hallucinations or non-bugs being described as bugs that any claim like this needs some real evidence. Saying you found 500 safety bugs in Rust but that you’re casually only filing a couple of them makes this hard to believe.

Don't let the hype turn you into a cynic. You're replying to a Rust core team member, who explicitly says the issues are mostly minor, across Rust ecosystem and not in Rust itself, and that they're filing them manually to avoid dumping unreviewed AI output on people.

It's easy to find the 37 issues they have already filed: https://github.com/search?q=soundness+gemini++author%3AManis...

Re: Anonymous GitHub account mass-dropping undisclosed 0-days

#405
I have a correction for CVE-2026-20896 (Gitea trusted-proxies / X-WEBAUTH-USER) was not part of this dump.

It was reported by @rz1027 (me) as in Gitea's coordinated 1.26.3 security release, credited in the release notes. The exploitarium's actual Gitea PoC is a different bug (act_runner container-options escape).

Refs: [https://blog.gitea.com/release-of-1.26.3-and-1.26.4/] [https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/security/advisories/GHSA-f... ] [https://hivesecurity.gitlab.io/blog/gitea-forgejo-nine-cves-...].

Re: Anonymous GitHub account mass-dropping undisclosed 0-days

#406
post #231

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The old book didn't say "... maliciously." though?

Of course not. You can melt things w thermite without being malicious. Like my friend's toolbox for instance.

But unless you have a level of chemistry experience that would put NileRed to shame, you cannot make drugs out of banana peels, and you really shouldn't even try.

Re: Anonymous GitHub account mass-dropping undisclosed 0-days

#407

This is common in the hype era of AI models that can look for security bugs. An open-source project I used to work on that is basically "distributed code execution as a service" keeps getting reports that the job submission function is a vulnerability. The reporters don't even understand what the project does.

Is the job submission handled securely? I've seen plenty of systems along the lines of what you're describing where unauthenticated clients can submit jobs. Sometimes the developers even claim that's intentional. Either way, it's a vulnerability, because it compromises the underlying hosts.

Yes, and that's not what people are reporting flaws in. The reports are "this daemon accepts arbitrary code and then runs it!"
Post reply on HN