Earlier quoted context omitted.
It is free, no subscription at all and truly open source. As software should be.
how should maintainer make money?
LittleSnitch for Linux
401–410 of 489 posts
Re: LittleSnitch for Linux
#402Recently I was wondering how viable it is to launch a niche, paid tool for Linux. I found that this is a very rare model, most tools are either just free, supported by sponsorship, supported by some paid cloud-based service that accompanies the tool, use an open-core model with paid add-ons. I wonder if the decision of Little Snitch to make the Linux version free forever was also informed by this "no way to make mone…
It's not that arcane.
Re: LittleSnitch for Linux
#403I remember before Little Snitch there was ZoneAlarm for Windows[0] (here is a good screenshot[1]). No clue if the current version of ZoneAlarm does anything like that (have not used it in 2 decades). I always found it weird that Linux never really had anything like it. [0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ZoneAlarm [1]: https://d2nwkt1g6n1fev.cloudfront.net/helpmax/wp-content/upl...
What I really liked about ZoneAlarm wasn't just that it was a very nice technology - and it was; but also that it got the user expectations and training right from a very early stage. It was quite insistent on the fact that it would be "noisy" at first as it queried all the programs you ran, but would then quieten down once it had been "trained". It got that across in clear, simple language. I think it was so success…
My personal computer had ZoneAlarm on it. It became ground zero for reporting about infected systems. They ignored systems they thought were save; CISCO phone system running on Windows server and other backend devices. The company then bought a few licenses to run their own laptops.
It is such a same that Microsoft destroyed _ERD Commander_ and other quality tools which assisted in the clean up.
Re: LittleSnitch for Linux
#404Earlier quoted context omitted.
Is there any DNS based software to do block/allow? Kinda lika what's present in CiliumNetworkPolicies in Kubernetes networking?
Yes, PiHole is the most common, but malware can easily bypass that using shared domains, P2P or IP addresses directly. Use a filtering proxy instead and no gateway / route to the internet.
2) You're advising security through obscurity instead of a network namespace + firewall.
Re: LittleSnitch for Linux
#405I use Lulu on my mac. Is it good enough (compared to LittleSnitch)?
Re: LittleSnitch for Linux
#406Re: LittleSnitch for Linux
#407Earlier quoted context omitted.
2026 is the year of the linux phone. We need to embrace that the year of the linux desktop (2025) was successful.
What does "the year of the Linux phone" mean when half the phones already run Linux?
Re: LittleSnitch for Linux
#408I'm glad people are building stuff for Linux, but the people who actually want something like this have likely already been using Opensnitch for years. I'm certainly not going to spend $60 for something that has been doing the job for free.
> You can find Little Snitch for Linux here[1]. It is free, and it will stay that way.
Re: LittleSnitch for Linux
#409The gold standard, which I haven't been able to achieve, is to be able to do a pi-hole/adguard style centralized control where I can allow youtube but block youtube shorts. All solutions I have seen talk about on-device setup which isn't an option given that I don't want to manage it on a per-device basis.
Re: LittleSnitch for Linux
#410The gold standard, which I haven't been able to achieve, is to be able to do a pi-hole/adguard style centralized control where I can allow youtube but block youtube shorts. All solutions I have seen talk about on-device setup which isn't an option given that I don't want to manage it on a per-device basis.
This is why DoH makes me nervous. Once the embedded ad engines(cough smart tv's) figure it out, we will no longer be able to mitm our dns services. Or to put it more plainly pi-hole will stop working. An open question, Any good way to block DoH? Or are heuristics the only answer?
An unenforceable option would be to set up an independent youtube frontend. https://invidious.io/
My opinion on shorts is a little more generous, sure they are generally brain-cell destroying bottom of the barrel clickbait nonsense. But that can also be said about most of the rest of youtube. What I hate specifically is the shorts doom-scrolling interface. It turns out a "short" can still be viewed on the normal interface. So I use a browser extension to turn shorts urls into normal urls.