Live data from Hacker News

DOGE has 'god mode' access to government data

theatlantic.com

401–410 of 1001 posts

Re: DOGE has 'god mode' access to government data

#401

"In the coming weeks, the team is expected to enter IT systems at the CDC and Federal Aviation Administration, and it already has done so at NASA" If this isn't a glaring conflict of interest and corruption, I don't know what is.

[flagged]

Re: DOGE has 'god mode' access to government data

#402
post #383

Earlier quoted context omitted.

An audit only needs read access, not God mode. It should be conducted by a neutral third party, not someone on a witch hunt who has conflicts of interest. The people on the ground should have auditing qualifications, clear background checks, and knowledge of specific systems or processes, not a random 19-year-old named "Big Balls" with a history of selling company secrets to a competitor. Their findings should go thr…

Ah, so more bureaucracy, bureaucracy, bureaucracy.

Would you buy shares in a company if the sole auditor of their financials was the CEO's best friend, who had no experience or qualifications in auditing, and he was not accountable to anyone if he was wrong? "Trust me bro" does not cut it. These structures and processes can be onerous but they exist for good reason. BTW our government is not so strapped for cash that they can't afford to do this properly.

Re: DOGE has 'god mode' access to government data

#403
post #384

Well, it is a government agency tasked with audits. Why shouldn't it have root access?

Your employer is being audited. An unaccompanied stranger wearing a visitor pass comes up to your desk. He says "Hello I'm the password security auditor, tell me your password so I can make sure it's secure"

Will your company fail the audit if don't hand over the information?

Or will your company fail the audit if if you do hand it over?

Re: DOGE has 'god mode' access to government data

#404
post #383

Earlier quoted context omitted.

An audit only needs read access, not God mode. It should be conducted by a neutral third party, not someone on a witch hunt who has conflicts of interest. The people on the ground should have auditing qualifications, clear background checks, and knowledge of specific systems or processes, not a random 19-year-old named "Big Balls" with a history of selling company secrets to a competitor. Their findings should go thr…

Ah, so more bureaucracy, bureaucracy, bureaucracy.

its a fucking audit

Re: DOGE has 'god mode' access to government data

#405
post #99

Isn't this the idea of an audit ?...

An audit only needs read access, not God mode. It should be conducted by a neutral third party, not someone on a witch hunt who has conflicts of interest. The people on the ground should have auditing qualifications, clear background checks, and knowledge of specific systems or processes, not a random 19-year-old named "Big Balls" with a history of selling company secrets to a competitor. Their findings should go thr…

They have read-only access, as the latest court documents (Google "Zeitner DOGE") show, and contrary to the fakenews that were peddled in the early days of that stuff. Big Balls can only use this read access from a provided Treasury laptop, on premises, and he's operating under review of other Treasury employees.

Re: DOGE has 'god mode' access to government data

#406

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[dupe]

Yeah 99% is sour grapes from the other team. I like what doge has turned up so far and will give them the benefit of the doubt. My wife is a long time liberal Democrat and even she admits the main problem is Musk is just doing out in the open what is usually done behind closed doors and people don’t like it.

It's like we go out to a twelve course dinner and get home and there is one 10 calories carrot on the table and we are tweeting to no end about our genius and our total transparently and robust diet of throwing away that carrot. "Carrots don't taste good anyways" they screen and people cheer.

Meanwhile we are actually losing vision and dying of obesity.

There is plenty to do to get more healthy for real; but that's not where we are heading with these initiatives so far:

https://prospect.org/economy/2025-01-27-we-found-the-2-trill...

Re: DOGE has 'god mode' access to government data

#407
post #384

Well, it is a government agency tasked with audits. Why shouldn't it have root access?

This is an idea you just made up to defend this BS.

Like, audit's require root access? What? Is this real life? Are people just making things up and saying whatever to defend someone who has no allegiance to this country getting the keys to the kingdom while also coincidentally making a fortune off of taxpayers through federal subsidies? Are you slow?

Re: DOGE has 'god mode' access to government data

#409
post #384

Well, it is a government agency tasked with audits. Why shouldn't it have root access?

Is it an actual government agency? From what I've (casually) read, it's an ad-hoc thing that isn't actually genuinely legitimate, from that standpoint?

It's not. But pseudo-intellects and idiots are still under Elon's spell.

Re: DOGE has 'god mode' access to government data

#410

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> IMHO it's a bit of a shame that the productivity and efficiency gains that computing and cybernetics can bring to complex systems They're just firing people at random, they haven't discovered any innovative new way to make systems more efficient. ("at random" is a bit generous and ignores the retaliation against political adversaries)

It's not "at random". Every shuttered department had been investigating one of Elmo's properties...

> It's not "at random". Every shuttered department had been investigating one of Elmo's properties...

¿Porque no los dos? Firing the folks that maintain nuclear weapons:

* https://apnews.com/article/nuclear-doge-firings-trump-federa...

Firing the folks dealing with bird flu:

* https://apnews.com/article/usda-firings-doge-bird-flu-trump-...

Also firing a whole bunch of folks at the FAA (including maintenance mechanics) even though it's already short staffed:

* https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cly9y1e1kpjo

Random and spiteful (?).

Post reply on HN