Live data from Hacker News

The fishy death of Red Lobster

businessinsider.com

401–410 of 540 posts

Re: The fishy death of Red Lobster

#401
post #393

I went to red lobster in Toronto yesterday as a "lets save red lobster Canada" idea I had in my head, they came to Canada the year I was born and my dad was obsessed so I have a lot of nostalgia. Came out thinking: let em burn. Worse than mediocre rubber for $200 after tip and tax.

Did you read the article? In there you will find the explanation of why you had a costly low-quality experience. Maybe this will clarify who the "'em" is. (It's not anyone you saw at the restaurant...)

That was exactly the point, I experienced what the article said first hand.

So let em burn!

Also: 9th up from the bottom: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

Re: The fishy death of Red Lobster

#402
post #393

I went to red lobster in Toronto yesterday as a "lets save red lobster Canada" idea I had in my head, they came to Canada the year I was born and my dad was obsessed so I have a lot of nostalgia. Came out thinking: let em burn. Worse than mediocre rubber for $200 after tip and tax.

Is it the same sh* like Tim Hortons? RIP then...

Overpriced bad food? Bingo!

Re: The fishy death of Red Lobster

#404
post #393

I went to red lobster in Toronto yesterday as a "lets save red lobster Canada" idea I had in my head, they came to Canada the year I was born and my dad was obsessed so I have a lot of nostalgia. Came out thinking: let em burn. Worse than mediocre rubber for $200 after tip and tax.

Is it the same sh* like Tim Hortons? RIP then...

Very tangential to the quality of chain restaurants that have decline in quality:

I'm from the US, but on the Canadian border, and Timmy's was the dominant coffee shop growing up. Even if you didn't drink coffee, that was the hang out.

We had a Dunkin that was probably less than 100 meters away from it that had a fire and never reopened. I definitely think it was a ploy for insurance money because they never had _any_ business. Tim Horton's dominated.

Then something happened around 2017 and their coffee became awful (it was never incredible, but it got much worse). Then their prices began to rise significantly. Whenever I go home, I get a cup of Timmy's coffee, but it's never good.

Turns out having nostalgia for a large food company doesn't play well in the long run. I'm sure the same applies to Red Lobster, but those kinds of places become part of your memories growing up and you want them to do well, maybe as a way of preserving those memories. Probably half of my friends and I had their first dates at Tim Horton's growing up. As much as I wish I didn't feel the need to drink their swill a few times a year, there's something that still draws me.

Re: The fishy death of Red Lobster

#405

I'm continually amazed by how much outrage normal and perfectly reasonable business strategies generate in the general public. None of this is unusual or in any way wrong. Red lobster (and olive garden) were mismanaged, and the investment funds were right about that. Their attempts at salvaging the situation were perfectly reasonable, even if they were ultimately unsuccessful. You're welcome to be outraged, but that…

Have you actually read the article ? It tells a different story:

They wanted Darden to liquidate all of Olive Garden's real-estate holdings and declare a one-off dividend that would net investors a billion dollars, while literally yanking the floor out from beneath Olive Garden, converting it from owner to tenant, subject to rent-shocks and other nasty surprises.

They wanted to asset-strip the company, in other words ("asset strip" is what they call it in hedge-fund land; the mafia calls it a "bust-out," famous to anyone who watched the twenty-third episode of The Sopranos)

The giant slide-deck making fun of Olive Garden's food was just a PR campaign to help it sell the bust-out by creating a narrative that they were being activists* to save this badly managed disaster of a restaurant chain

Re: The fishy death of Red Lobster

#406
post #393

I went to red lobster in Toronto yesterday as a "lets save red lobster Canada" idea I had in my head, they came to Canada the year I was born and my dad was obsessed so I have a lot of nostalgia. Came out thinking: let em burn. Worse than mediocre rubber for $200 after tip and tax.

> I went to red lobster in Toronto yesterday...Worse than mediocre rubber for $200 after tip and tax...Came out thinking: let em burn.

My homeless ex wanted RL for her bday last year. All of us and the families took her there for dinner. For me it was comparable to Walmart canned and frozen. She was happy enough with it but then she fixates on things.

Re: The fishy death of Red Lobster

#407

I'm continually amazed by how much outrage normal and perfectly reasonable business strategies generate in the general public. None of this is unusual or in any way wrong. Red lobster (and olive garden) were mismanaged, and the investment funds were right about that. Their attempts at salvaging the situation were perfectly reasonable, even if they were ultimately unsuccessful. You're welcome to be outraged, but that…

> None of this is unusual or in any way wrong.

You're completely correct. Everything described in the article was completely legal.

The things that are illegal, like overfishing protected waters, the company doesn't do. Instead, they lobby to make it legal, then do it.

See, all above board. It's all legal. Why would anyone get upset about a company that isn't breaking the law? If it were wrong it would be illegal, right?

Re: The fishy death of Red Lobster

#408
post #393

I went to red lobster in Toronto yesterday as a "lets save red lobster Canada" idea I had in my head, they came to Canada the year I was born and my dad was obsessed so I have a lot of nostalgia. Came out thinking: let em burn. Worse than mediocre rubber for $200 after tip and tax.

I had a really bad dining experience the one single time I went to Red Lobster; happened at the same place probably (Toronto, the one in Bay Street?) hence why I want to share.

I came in to the restaurant and there was no one at the front desk, but the place seemed to be operating normally so I just went on to seat at the nearest table I found. Waiters just started ignoring me; at some point I realized this was on purpose. Wtf.

Anyway, after like 20 mins. I stand up and ask one of the guys "what's going on?". He tells me that they knew I was there (!) but decided to ignore me because no one "seated me at that place". I tell him, well, do that now ... the guy just tells me they don't want to do that anymore because I should've done it when I entered the restaurant, then just like that asks me to leave the place (wtf x2).

I tell him that's ridiculous and he just says "I'm calling security" and walks away. After a few minutes, two huge guys come to my table and ask me what the problem is (they were actually quite polite). I tell them, I just walked into the restaurant, sat here, and just want to order something. They look at each other a bit confused (who knows what the waiter told them), ask me if that's it, "yes", ..., "ok, wait here a bit". After another like 10 mins., a different waiter comes up and starts catering to me.

Everything was normal afterwards, but that was super weird. Imagine getting beat up for walking into a restaurant and wanting to get some food.

Needless to say I never came back as the food turned out to be quite average, definitely not worth fighting for it, lol.

Re: The fishy death of Red Lobster

#409

I'm continually amazed by how much outrage normal and perfectly reasonable business strategies generate in the general public. None of this is unusual or in any way wrong. Red lobster (and olive garden) were mismanaged, and the investment funds were right about that. Their attempts at salvaging the situation were perfectly reasonable, even if they were ultimately unsuccessful. You're welcome to be outraged, but that…

Did you read the article? The mismanagement was the supplier buying the purchaser with the most negotiating power and bankrupt them (by extracting as much equity as possible). This leaves purchasers with less negotiating power and the ability to raise prices. It was intentional.

While I can’t vouch for the accuracy of the strategy, the comparison with there health industry jives with my own experiences. Insurance companies buying up hospital chains to compete against pharma and gutting them in the process. When it’s hospitals shutting down instead of Red Lobster maybe people will understand.

Re: The fishy death of Red Lobster

#410

Private equity seems to have a high rate of taking something beloved and successful, and then killing it.

It's unclear to me how much is private equity "ruining" the business and how much is making it visible. Here in Portland a private equity firm bought a bunch of local restaurants and mini chains during the pandemic. Now they struggle paying workers and rent and are closing a lot of these businesses. My suspicion is that they bought these businesses when they were distressed and otherwise wouldn't have survived at all. Now the pandemic recovery here has been famously bad and these businesses aren't recovering. I suspect the play here was to buy for cheap, help them through the pandemic and have a bunch of guys businesses. Honestly everyone would IMO have been a winner. Employees, customers, investors and even the founders who lost their business but at least got done money for it and see it continue. I don't think we can blame this particular private equity firm in this situation. As a customer the transition was not noticeable.

How many private equity acquisitions are like this but circumstances are less obvious and the measurers to rescue need to be more involved than just waiting for a pandemic to end? I genuinely don't know. But I suspect that it's very easy, looking in from the outside as a customer, to come to the conclusion that the business went bad when private equity came in when the business was already struggling but prior leadership was avoiding dramatic changes.

Post reply on HN