401–410 of 453 posts
Note that "no training on your data" is only for Team and Enterprise: https://openai.com/chatgpt/pricing
You can make a privacy request for OpenAI to not train on your data here: https://privacy.openai.com/ Alternatively, you could also use your own UI/API token (API calls aren't trained on). Chatbot UI just got a major update released and has nice things like folders, and chat search: https://github.com/mckaywrigley/chatbot-ui
A notable feature here is "no training on your business data or conversations" which really shouldn't have to be a feature. (requests using the ChatGPT API already aren't trained upon)
Earlier quoted context omitted.
At Kagi we plan to offer this for $20/mo and 6 family members included. You get both paid search (much better than openai bing) + AI (gpt-3.5-turbo/claude-instant). If you need gpt-4 it will be an optional $15/mo upgrade per family member.
This is not a comment on the Kagi service, but more a comment on transitions in general. I have tried Kagi and I think it's great. I really want to use Kagi. I want to support Kagi. I have a mental stickynote that says 'start using Kagi on everything'. Every time I sit down to do some tasks it just falls to the bottom of the to-do pile because I feel like there's so many devices I now need to go through and update. G…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
You can make a privacy request for OpenAI to not train on your data here: https://privacy.openai.com/ Alternatively, you could also use your own UI/API token (API calls aren't trained on). Chatbot UI just got a major update released and has nice things like folders, and chat search: https://github.com/mckaywrigley/chatbot-ui
It should be opt out by default: not opt in.
A notable feature here is "no training on your business data or conversations" which really shouldn't have to be a feature. (requests using the ChatGPT API already aren't trained upon)
Google trains on all your searches. Why is OpenAI held to a higher standard?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Quite the opposite actually. My intent is to shed light on the fact that sharing information with OpenAI is not private. And you should not do that with information that you wouldn't even share with people you trust. I'm not OP, but I think you're missing the point. Privacy and trust isn't really a 1D gradient, it's probably planar or even spatial if anything. Personally I'd be more willing to trust OpenAI with cer…
> Same reason behind why someone may be willing to post a relationship situation to r/relationship_advice and yet not talk about the same thing with family and friends. I ask that you consider the people who use Reddit and the people who run Reddit independently. The people who use Reddit are not in a position of power over someone who asks for advice. The people who run Reddit on the other hand, are in a position of…
Your family has limited power in the grand scheme of things, but the likelihood that they may leverage what power you give them over you is much higher.
The IRS has vast power and is likely to use it against you, hence why tax fraud is usually a bad idea.
Hence "planar" rather than linear.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> If you don't want your family to know something, you shouldn't tell it to OpenAI either. Yeah, I think this is an over reduction of personal privacy models, but can you tell me why you believe this?
The reason you wouldn't say something to someone is because you are afraid of the power that you give people along with that knowledge. Your family is in a a position of power, which is why it can be scary to share information with them. People at OpenAI are also at a position of power, but people who use their services seem to forget that, since they're talking to them through a computer that automatically responds.
tldr: power (or if you want, impact) is the linear dimension, likelihood adds a second dimension to the plane of trust.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Here's a glossary to understand this post: - mixtral-8x7 or 8x7: Open source model by Mistral AI. - Dolphin: An uncensored version of the mistral model - 3.5-turbo: GPT-3.5 Turbo, the cheapest API from OpenAI - 4-series preview OR "4.5 preview": GPT-4 Turbo, the most capable API from OpenAI - mistral-medium: A new model by Mistral AI that they are only serving through AI. It's in private beta and there's a waiting li…
I asked ChatGPT to rewrite the original post using your glossary, which worked well: I've set up my system to use several AI models: the open-source Mixtral-8x7, Dolphin (an uncensored version of Mixtral), GPT-3.5 Turbo (a cost-effective option from OpenAI), and the latest GPT-4 Turbo from OpenAI. I can easily compare their performances in Emacs. Lately, I've noticed that GPT-4 Turbo is starting to outperform Mixtral…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
No you can't, because you actually don't know which model is which when you vote.
Do only the initial votes count? Because after I made an initial choice I was then put in a session where I saw the name of both of the AI. I made subsequent votes in that session where I could see their names.
I want ChatGPT for Family. The free version gets a lot of use around here but the most powerful feature is the ability to search the web, which is only available to paid users. I pay $20/month for myself and I’d happily pay a bit more for the whole family, but not $20/month per person - it adds up. Family members end up asking to borrow my phone a lot to use it. Give me a 3-4 person plan that costs $30-$40/month. You…
At Kagi we plan to offer this for $20/mo and 6 family members included. You get both paid search (much better than openai bing) + AI (gpt-3.5-turbo/claude-instant). If you need gpt-4 it will be an optional $15/mo upgrade per family member.