Live data from Hacker News

Google I/O 2023

io.google

401–410 of 443 posts

Re: Google I/O 2023

#401

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Bard needs API access.

There is Vertex AI, which some people are getting early access to (what i hope is) PaLM2 | ULM. The GCP offering only contains tools for your own models, what everyone wants is an alternative to ChatGPT, a pre-trained LLM from Google accessible via API and fine tune-able in Vertex. There is this in the meantime: https://github.com/acheong08/Bard

This aged well :]

APIs are available since the middle of the presentation!

Re: Google I/O 2023

#402
post #212

So funny to see google stressing EVERYTIME that they have been using AI for years. Dude, you were seated in the pot of gold and let your organizational disfuncionality block you from really using that. And now you come trying to get the crown of AI? Catch up and them we can talk.

OpenAI must be sweating profusely after viewing that I/O presentation. Not only do they not have the integration, scale and user base of Google, but the migration of Bard to PaLM 2 it will exceed whatever OpenAI currently has. Also, it's only a matter of time before their top employee's are poached by Apple and Google.

> OpenAI must be sweating profusely after viewing that I/O presentation. Not only do they not have the integration, scale and user base of Google ...

Good thing OpenAI has a distribution partner in Microsoft Azure, then.

Re: Google I/O 2023

#403

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My family member works for this team. Could you share what makes you a Pixel fan? Some like customizability, open platform . Some avoid Apple lock in. What draws you to Pixel?

It's pretty simple: Pixel's are just the best "stock Android" phone there is. So many other Android device makers just slap a crappy UI on top of stock Android that offers no real value. In addition, Pixels always get the latest os updates, and Google recently improved support timeframes so they'll get support for years, on par with iPhones - that was a huge sticking point for years. There are some other specific fea…

great feedback thanks!

Re: Google I/O 2023

#404

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If AI can generate them trivially, maybe that suggests cover letters should not have been that important to begin with. To me, the main benefit of a cover letter is that it shows the applicant is engaged enough to actually make an application that is specific to a job posting. That is still the case with AI, it just saves everyone creating them a huge amount of work - most of which is completely wasted when the major…

The ability to write a polite and on-topic email used to be a valuable skill to demonstrate. Not so much anymore.

I currently use it for that, it's honestly a great anger translator.

Re: Google I/O 2023

#405

: create a Google I/O keynote on this and that project. Mention AI at every turn. All subtly cringe, unexciting. Presenting million ways AI takes a whole lot of the real creation & soul out of every human-technology interaction. Plus feeling society not ready to handle this.

I'm beginning to wonder if soulless, boring, corpspeak AI-generated text is going to turn out to be a huge competitive disadvantage for those who become reliant on it. If someone sends me an email or a message that sounds AI-generated, it's easy to tell that it's not meaningful. So I end up ignoring it entirely. I'm also concerned about folks who actually try to use "AI" like Bard to assist with life decisions like t…

AI speak will be the corporate manager speak of the 2020s

Re: Google I/O 2023

#406
post #382

Earlier quoted context omitted.

HN tends to bias towards pro Apple. You would see people doing mental gymnastics trying to defend their closed anti competitive practices, disregard for standards. I would cheer a Sennheiser/Bose more than any version of Airpods, I would rather not have a multi trillion dollar company gobble up other industries through unfair advantages. Seeing a hacker crowd do this is just beyond bizzare.

> HN tends to bias towards pro Apple Possibly the most reliable phenomenon I've observed as a mod is that people believe HN is biased against what they like and in favor of what they dislike. This shows up most often with politics - for a recent example see https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35734307 ("HN leans left") followed by https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35734354 ("HN leans left?") and https://news.ycom…

Oh no, I didn't mean moderators are biased. I don't think that is the case at all.

I was making the point of the HN users. Specially the characteristic of downvoting and negating criticism in this case.

You are right though, because I strongly feel about the anti competitive issues Apple indulges in, maybe I visit those threads more and tend to notice them.

Although, I think there is a positive bias as well, which I care less about. Like one of the commenter mentioned that Final Cut Pro being launched on iPad was the top post through large parts of the day.

Re: Google I/O 2023

#407
post #235

The focus on watermarking is interesting. If the major players embed watermarking, it probably will be meaningfully be used to detect cases where generated content is passed off as real. Unfortunately, proving authenticity isn't going to be possible. It's inevitable that there will be models out there built specifically to attempt to evade such detection. Society needs to adapt to the new reality that anything can be…

> Society needs to adapt to the new reality that anything can be faked. It is only the price tag that has dropped. Faking stuff have become democracized.

Yeah, it's been possible for a while, but the barrier to entry for it was high. Like you said, the scale of the problem is what's changed.

Re: Google I/O 2023

#408

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It will be interesting to see how the data & AI conversations evolve. A bit like smartphones, I’m scared we’ll first see an explosion of features then some backtracking to figure out the security & privacy models. I wish we’d learned to start with security. I didn’t get to see the entire thing, but I did see the AI-enabled cinematic photo backgrounds. All I could think is man that’s a lot of analysis of my personal i…

>A bit like smartphones, I’m scared we’ll first see an explosion of features then some backtracking to figure out the security & privacy models When was the backtracking with smartphones?

Maybe wrong word I just meant permissions were wider and more universal (for say location access or notifications) and now we’ve learned to make each granular permission opt in.

Re: Google I/O 2023

#409
post #296

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I believe one of it's defining features is that if you are experiencing the effect, only the people around you know it.

yes, that's why I'm the one who is pointing the following trait to the HN crowd who are blissfully unaware of it -- "Irrationally Hating things / people that have provided net benefit to the society (utility, pension plans, 401(k)s, employee salary, productivity, standard-of-living)"

And it took years to get it with them kicking, screaming, and trying to take it away the entire time. Who has a pension plan these days?

Re: Google I/O 2023

#410
Some good stuff here. I like the Pixel 7A. I like that we've got another competitor in the LLM API market.

But I wish Google would come out with a world-shifting technology like they used to. Maps, YouTube, Search. Surely they could do some crazy stuff with AI this year.

Post reply on HN