Earlier quoted context omitted.
There's a lot of wiggle room between sane consumption and addiction. And addiction is becoming the norm. I'd add that even if you were to consume no news at all, you'd still get the summary of it one way or another. I'll now continue with my hot take: being informed, even being an expert, on anything outside your field of work is overrated, if not useless. Say you've been following the recent war in great depth. Or t…
You'll have witnessed history unfold in front of your very own eyes. You'll know the difference between what the history books will claim 20 years from now and the public debate shift based on that, and what you've actually witnessed. Granted, you are (likely) not actually on the ground where the tanks and rockets and soldiers meet, but you are another layer or two closer to being a witness of history. Which you are…
No, you'll know the propaganda you're being fed which often only gets revealed 20 years later. Like what happened in Iraq.
Every time you think you're being informed by the media, you should consider if you would have believed them 18 years ago when the media was full of pundits manufacturing consent for war against Iraq by claiming they had WMDs. The playbook doesn't really change, only the story being told. You only get the real story much later.