Live data from Hacker News

Leaked Amazon memo warns the company is running out of people to hire

vox.com

401–410 of 764 posts

Re: Leaked Amazon memo warns the company is running out of people to hire

#402

Earlier quoted context omitted.

From a recent Bloomberg article: Wealth of bottom 50% doubled between 2020-2022. Top 1% rose significantly. While the remaining 49% didnt budge much. Interpret it for your supply chain concerns.

How much of that wealth increase for the bottom 50% was driven by exploding property / home value increases ?

The bottom 50% own very little. Home ownership rates in the USA are like 65% and poorer people are less likely to own their homes.

So the answer is likely, a negligible amount. The increase in wealth among poorer people was most likely driven by stimulus money and a bit due to wage increases (which also favored the poor).

Re: Leaked Amazon memo warns the company is running out of people to hire

#403

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> employees will naturally want to leave within four years That also explains why the breadth of AWS services keep growing, but the depth of the existing ones remains the same. Seems they would, every 4 years, lose a bunch of people with deep knowledge in the existing ones, the ones who'd be able to add new and deep features.

The number of services is just crazy - I've worked with AWS solutions architects in trying to find the perfect solution to our particular problems, and even they don't seem to know what half the stuff does.

Maybe they stick around for only 4 years too.

Re: Leaked Amazon memo warns the company is running out of people to hire

#404

I was getting daily recruiting emails on my personal emails, and recently they started sending recruiting emails to my work address. I obviously never signed up for anything with that one, so they must be sourcing them from very shady people somewhere. The recruiter refused to tell me where they sourced my work email from, but she said she'll remove it from their database.

Same here (daily emails). I've been getting enough of them to start seeing that most of the emails from amazon are generated in some form. A generated recruiting email is pretty much an immediate turn off for me. Also, they have been very aggressive... going as far as the same recruiter reaching out on a monthly basis despite me telling them I am not interested.

It’s the same for Google, Microsoft and Facebook.

I’ve gotten emails from Google about Engineering Manager positions for software developers even though my LinkedIn profile shows no management experience (I have none) and it has that I’m not even currently officially a software developer (cloud app dev consulting).

The same with Facebook.

Re: Leaked Amazon memo warns the company is running out of people to hire

#405

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Likewise, I’ve always found it amusing that right wing business guys pay lip service to being against illegal immigration, yet they move their meat packing plants to nowhere-ville.

"use illegal immigration for meat packing" isn't a broadly-held right-wing position, it's something certain unprincipled business owners do (and I'm not even sure that they're universally right-wing). In contrast, "increasing wages" and "increasing mass immigration" are broadly-held left-wing positions. Again, this doesn't suggest incoherence on the left.

Please. It’s deeply embedded in GOP power brokering. Principles are for the mass of idiots.

The only difference today is that after years of taking the votes of reactionaries and doing little, the populist blocs of reactionary voters are the tail wagging the dog.

Re: Leaked Amazon memo warns the company is running out of people to hire

#407

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is not unusual at all. My first job as a developer was with a big consulting firm. Undergraduate seniors were hired en masse every year as entry-level staff consultants. The expectation (not stated, but not hard to figure out) was that many would leave within a few years. Some would remain and get promoted, even fewer would stick around long enough to be considered for partnership. The work hours were long (50 h…

Quoted post unavailable.

> Abuse is OK because some people eventually figure out how to get away from it?

I take issue with calling it abuse, but yes -- it's a learning experience and a life lesson. I did it, I was disillusioned with school, quit and worked in manual labor, delivery, and restaurant jobs when I was young. Decided I didn't want to do that for life, so I went back to school and learned to program computers. Then I worked as a consultant, decided that was too many hours and too much time away from home, so I found another job that was better on those metrics. Decided I didn't like living in a huge metro area, so found another job in a small town.

Life isn't handed to you, and if it is, you don't appreciate what you have.

Re: Leaked Amazon memo warns the company is running out of people to hire

#408
post #353

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This actually seems like a structural weakness in cloud, where so much of revenue comes from the relatively few customers who are very deep in their usage. On the other hand, you can usually rely on close relationships with those customers to identify their significant needs. However, it might be harden to implement them without the bench of deeply knowledgeable engineers.

It seems unlikely to me that this analysis applies to amzn's retail division.

If you spend any time reading their retail forums [1], you'll see almost everyone lambasting Amazon constantly. Either disgruntled sellers who broke the rules and got terminated, or normal, hardworking mom-and-pop stores that were all but forced to sell on Amazon and consistently lose money due to amazon's ever-changing policies, poor support, and catering to large retailers. Large retailers get a direct line and quality support, while most sellers on Amazon get treated like crap.

[1]: https://sellercentral.amazon.com/forums/

Re: Leaked Amazon memo warns the company is running out of people to hire

#410

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Quoted post unavailable.

We do it in the medical and legal field under the guise of “experience” and “career development”. Is it different because it’s blue collar hourly work and not used as a foundation for a lucrative career. I think it should stop in all places but we seem to disregard shitty work arrangements for the few prestigious and financially lucrative careers and cry wolf for those hourly souls. Why is that?

...this seems to ignore the huge amount of scrutiny these kinds of practices are getting in the medical field.
Post reply on HN